**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Wed Jan 31 02:59:59 2007 Jan 31 16:43:27 nbd * r6233 /trunk/target/linux/rb532-2.6/image/Makefile: fix rb532 image build Jan 31 17:57:44 mbm * r6234 /trunk/ (Makefile package/Makefile scripts/feeds.sh): move "make symlinks" to "make package/symlinks" Jan 31 19:23:32 nbd * r6235 /trunk/package/busybox/config/networking/Config.in: enable httpd sighup config reload by default Jan 31 19:42:05 mbm * r6236 /trunk/include/prereq.mk: print package name when prereq fails Jan 31 19:43:21 <[mbm]> ^- useful if you use the compile all packages Jan 31 21:45:55 heh Jan 31 21:46:00 interesting wiki pages... Jan 31 21:46:06 people posting questions Jan 31 21:46:25 <[mbm]> ? Jan 31 21:47:08 http://wiki.openwrt.org/Valerius Jan 31 21:47:14 how can those pages be deleted? Jan 31 21:47:31 or can only admins do that? Jan 31 21:48:28 <[mbm]> well, nothing stoping you from editing the page but there really doesn't seem to be any point to doing that Jan 31 21:51:47 that's why I was asking about deletion Jan 31 21:52:28 <[mbm]> well, no reason to delete it either Jan 31 21:52:52 <[mbm]> if it was in the middle of some existing page I'd probably clean it up Jan 31 21:53:05 <[mbm]> but that's just someone's homepage Jan 31 21:53:38 hmtrue Jan 31 21:55:23 once we have to clean up that whole mess Jan 31 22:52:37 hey guys, I work for Tim Yardley (lst), and I ve got a question about some image builder stuff... Jan 31 22:53:33 <[mbm]> ? Jan 31 22:53:51 in target/linux/x86-2.6/image/Makefile in Image/Prepare, grub stage files are copied to $(STAGING_DIR)/bin unconditionally. Is this intentional? Jan 31 22:54:36 The problem occurs when you build an initramfs image for x86 without previously building grub. Of course the build fails. Jan 31 22:55:10 <[mbm]> hmm probably a bug Jan 31 22:59:21 can be sshfs a candidate for package ? Jan 31 23:00:11 it run by fuse Jan 31 23:00:50 I've fixed it in my local copy by adding a check for CONFIG_X86_GRUB_IMAGES (see http://pastebin.com/872500). Does that seem reasonable, or do you have a better suggestion Jan 31 23:01:37 fabsoft: its very big in comparison to shf Jan 31 23:01:38 s Jan 31 23:01:48 <[mbm]> https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/trunk/package/shfs/Makefile Jan 31 23:02:04 i mean ssh-fs Jan 31 23:02:18 <[mbm]> fabsoft: read the description Jan 31 23:02:43 isn't shfs broken in 2.6.19.2 anyway Jan 31 23:03:08 i tried once to port sshfs but {Nico} said its rather huge Jan 31 23:03:27 http://fuse.sourceforge.net/sshfs.html Jan 31 23:04:19 [mbm], i mean the small user space app Jan 31 23:05:34 <[mbm]> "small"? :P Jan 31 23:05:54 :) Jan 31 23:06:03 small size... Jan 31 23:06:13 and big fun... Jan 31 23:07:02 * [mbm] gets the feeling some people don't actually speak english Jan 31 23:07:23 [mbm]: ? Jan 31 23:07:27 :P Jan 31 23:07:30 [mbm]: are these references to other channels again? Jan 31 23:07:55 <[mbm]> armijn: nope, funny enough. Jan 31 23:08:00 hm Jan 31 23:08:25 * [mbm] didn't ask for a definition of what small means Jan 31 23:09:21 now you know it Jan 31 23:09:30 ;-) Jan 31 23:09:44 <[mbm]> and knowing is half the battle Jan 31 23:09:59 <[mbm]> (the other half is 22 minutes of senseless violence) Jan 31 23:10:00 i learn english by the web Jan 31 23:10:53 ... Jan 31 23:11:07 [mbm]: or a decade of occupation :P Jan 31 23:11:20 <[mbm]> dragorn: *grin* Feb 01 00:32:01 pavlov * r6237 /trunk/target/linux/x86-2.6/image/Makefile: clean up the x86 image build a bit, fixing unconditional copy of grub files **** ENDING LOGGING AT Thu Feb 01 02:59:57 2007