**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Wed Apr 06 02:59:58 2011
Apr 06 03:06:19 <CIA-83> cshore * r26496 /packages/net/miniupnpd/Makefile: [net] Firewall: miniupnpd: Removed dependency and linking to libip6tc as ipv6 isn't used with miniupnpd.
Apr 06 03:21:54 <builder_> build #1 of s3c24xx is complete: Failure [failed compile_10]  Build details are at http://tksite.gotdns.org:8010/builders/s3c24xx/builds/1
Apr 06 10:17:14 <xMff> russell--: it means   "quilt push 123-wanted.patch" if you're at the start of the series or "quilt pop 123-wanted.patch" if you're at the end
Apr 06 10:17:51 <xMff> russell--: if you give a patch name with push or pop it will apply (or remove) all patches until it reaches the wanted one
Apr 06 10:18:25 <xMff> russell--: quilt series shows the patch series and quilt top shows where you are to decide whether push or pop is needed
Apr 06 14:23:05 <KanjiMonster> how did this DUMP=1 work again to debug Makefiles?
Apr 06 14:23:26 <nbd> make -C package/<name> DUMP=1 TOPDIR=$PWD
Apr 06 14:23:36 <KanjiMonster> ah, thanks
Apr 06 14:23:42 <KanjiMonster> I was missing the topdir
Apr 06 14:23:46 <nbd> i'll make an alias for that at some point
Apr 06 14:26:04 <CIA-83> zandbelt * r26497 /packages/net/asterisk-1.8.x/Makefile: [packages] asterisk-1.8.x: update to asterisk 1.8.3.2; fix astdatadir; add dependency parameter to module template
Apr 06 14:35:29 <builder_> build #1 of uml is complete: Failure [failed compile_10]  Build details are at http://tksite.gotdns.org:8010/builders/uml/builds/1
Apr 06 14:49:16 <CIA-83> nbd * r26498 /trunk/include/ (kernel-build.mk kernel-defaults.mk target.mk):
Apr 06 14:49:16 <CIA-83> build: clean up handling of the kernel config
Apr 06 14:49:16 <CIA-83> - support kernel config overlays in env/
Apr 06 14:49:16 <CIA-83> - allow overriding the target kernel config with CONFIG_TARGET=platform|subtarget|env
Apr 06 14:49:18 <CIA-83> nbd * r26499 /trunk/include/scan.mk: build: log package dump failures to logs to avoid forcing user to write cryptic commands to figure out what's going on
Apr 06 14:49:33 <nbd> KanjiMonster: ^
Apr 06 14:49:33 <nbd> ;)
Apr 06 14:51:18 <mazilo> ndb: So, that is a security patch, right?
Apr 06 14:52:00 <KanjiMonster> yay
Apr 06 14:52:18 <mazilo> KanjiMonster: Thanks.
Apr 06 14:53:12 <nbd> mazilo: huh? security patch?
Apr 06 14:53:14 <KanjiMonster> huh? I didn't do anything
Apr 06 14:53:45 <mazilo> ndb: LOL.
Apr 06 14:53:54 <[florian]> mazilo: btw, it's nbd, not ndb :)
Apr 06 14:54:19 <nbd> mazilo: ah, you're just writing nonsense and laughing at us trying to make sense of it... now i get it
Apr 06 14:54:23 <mazilo> nbd: I apologize. I kept writing 'ndb', instead of 'nbd'.
Apr 06 14:54:59 <mazilo> nbd: No and that's not what I meant. Honestly, I mis-read the comment.
Apr 06 14:55:17 <nbd> ah, ok
Apr 06 14:55:26 <nbd> then i misread the "LOL" ;)
Apr 06 14:55:45 <mazilo> nbd: Cheers.
Apr 06 14:56:50 <CIA-83> acoul * r26500 /packages/net/wavemon/ (5 files in 2 dirs): net/wavemon: update to version 0.7.2, include some upstream patches
Apr 06 15:02:23 <KanjiMonster> Olipro: fyi, I fixed the webadmin compile for uclibc++ (I didn't test whether it actually works, though ;)
Apr 06 15:08:49 <KanjiMonster> hm, can I have more than one Build/Compile section if I have more than one package in a Makefile? I'm trying to make znc compile only modules that are selected, so it would be nice if I could define a Build/Compile/<package> or something like that (I tried that, and it got ignored ;)
Apr 06 15:11:43 <jow_laptop> no you can't
Apr 06 15:11:50 <jow_laptop> and you shouldn't
Apr 06 15:13:02 <nbd> actually you can define multiple sections and merge them into one Build/Compile section
Apr 06 15:13:15 <nbd> but you need to use PKG_CONFIG_DEPENDS
Apr 06 15:13:28 <nbd> to ensure that config changes are handled properly
Apr 06 15:13:33 <builder_> build #1 of orion is complete: Failure [failed compile_7]  Build details are at http://tksite.gotdns.org:8010/builders/orion/builds/1
Apr 06 15:13:42 <KanjiMonster> sounds compilcated
Apr 06 15:13:48 <KanjiMonster> ;)
Apr 06 15:15:09 <KanjiMonster> jow_laptop: and why not? each znc module can be built with a single make call without modifying any Makefiles from znc, so I thought it would be nice to reduce the build time by skipping all non selected modules
Apr 06 15:15:32 <KanjiMonster> there's no reconfiguration needed for that
Apr 06 15:16:16 <KanjiMonster> (of znc itself)
Apr 06 15:22:14 <jow_laptop> KanjiMonster: then I'd say adjust the build compile section
Apr 06 15:22:44 <jow_laptop> KanjiMonster: make it loop over the modules and call make for each selected one
Apr 06 15:23:00 <jow_laptop> KanjiMonster: and don't forget to define PKG_CONFIG_DEPENDS to properly trigger recompilation
Apr 06 16:01:03 <ermo> Hauke: Is there anything I can do to help re. https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/9097 ?
Apr 06 16:11:33 <jow_laptop> KanjiMonster: you might want to take a look at the luci makefile, it is remotely similar
Apr 06 16:11:55 <jow_laptop> KanjiMonster: ... means many conditionally compiled submodules out of the same source
Apr 06 16:12:21 <jow_laptop> bbl
Apr 06 16:32:06 <KanjiMonster> jow_laptop: thanks to you PKG_CONFIG_DEPENDS is already defined ;)
Apr 06 16:51:08 <xMff> KanjiMonster: though I'm not sure whether it actually works
Apr 06 16:51:32 <xMff> KanjiMonster: order is very important, I had to move around stuff in the luci makefile until it worked as expected
Apr 06 16:52:11 <xMff> KanjiMonster: means it must get populated after include package.mk but before $(eval $(call ...))
Apr 06 16:52:35 <builder_> build #1 of ppc40x is complete: Failure [failed compile_6]  Build details are at http://tksite.gotdns.org:8010/builders/ppc40x/builds/1
Apr 06 17:19:09 <[Fate]> doh whats will all the yacto hype. now they even talk about preferring owrt to switch over
Apr 06 17:19:44 <sn9> not gonna happen
Apr 06 17:21:48 <builder_> build #1 of lantiq is complete: Failure [failed compile_6]  Build details are at http://tksite.gotdns.org:8010/builders/lantiq/builds/1
Apr 06 17:24:28 <blogic> whats yacto ?
Apr 06 17:24:55 <russell--> yocto
Apr 06 17:25:02 <xMff> [Fate]: who?
Apr 06 17:25:11 <russell--> the openembedded thingie
Apr 06 17:25:56 <[Fate]> new "project" they're just announcing on the collaboration summit
Apr 06 17:27:00 <xMff> well, let them fail in peace
Apr 06 17:27:59 <russell--> Acinonyx: ping
Apr 06 17:30:10 <xMff> [Fate]: got a link?
Apr 06 17:32:03 <russell--> xMff: http://www.yoctoproject.org/
Apr 06 17:32:14 <xMff> well that one I know
Apr 06 17:32:40 <xMff> was more interested in the collaboration thing
Apr 06 17:33:18 <blogic> xMff: :D
Apr 06 17:34:09 <xMff> blogic: ;)
Apr 06 17:35:00 <[Fate]> check the linux foundation website
Apr 06 17:35:32 <russell--> http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/collaboration-summit
Apr 06 17:36:50 <blogic> hmm
Apr 06 17:37:03 <blogic> sounds like one of these "let us tell you what to do"
Apr 06 17:37:18 <blogic> like the libre people "we decided what free means"
Apr 06 17:37:39 <xMff> "we'll tell you in two training units for only 600 USD"
Apr 06 17:37:42 <blogic> ok, its the other end of the planet and invite only
Apr 06 17:37:56 <blogic> xMff: ah it costa money, very open
Apr 06 17:37:58 <blogic> ;)
Apr 06 17:38:52 <xMff> to me yocto looks like big business' attempt to buy into the embedded ecosystem
Apr 06 17:39:10 <xMff> and to throw some weight around
Apr 06 17:39:14 * russell-- searched the yoctoproject site for openwrt and i got no results
Apr 06 17:40:03 <blogic> russell--: that would be silly
Apr 06 17:40:05 <blogic> ;)
Apr 06 17:40:34 <xMff> the blog posts are crazy... "Extending the Yocto Project with Poky meta layers" sounds a bit like pokemon
Apr 06 17:41:32 <russell--> "The Yocto Project inherits the core build tool (bitbake) and metadata syntax from OpenEmbedded, which is currently the most popular embedded development tool."
Apr 06 17:41:55 <russell--> "the most popular"
Apr 06 17:42:04 <xMff> however, they make it sound like they're some generic linux embedded ... whatever ... while in reality they just claim to be a coordination group for OE
Apr 06 17:42:21 <xMff> or something like that
Apr 06 17:42:30 <xMff> tbh I still don't get what they're actually
Apr 06 17:42:46 <blogic> i dont see the competition
Apr 06 17:42:53 <blogic> whats the fuzz about ?!
Apr 06 17:43:03 <xMff> dunno
Apr 06 17:43:09 <blogic> s/competition/relation
Apr 06 17:43:11 <xMff> linux has a new shooting star
Apr 06 17:43:22 <blogic> ah buzzword bingo :)
Apr 06 17:44:30 * russell-- doesn't understand the shunning of openwrtitude
Apr 06 17:44:59 * xMff doesnt understand openwrtitude
Apr 06 17:45:35 <russell--> i mean, by the yocto-yahoos
Apr 06 17:45:57 <russell--> what is not to like about openwrt?
Apr 06 17:46:20 <xMff> its too embedded
Apr 06 17:46:37 <xMff> I think the yocto foo is about the kind of embedded with 256MB+ storage, arm and display
Apr 06 17:46:44 <russell--> i guess it's mostly full employment for marketers who get to have meetings about word like yocto
Apr 06 17:46:46 <xMff> not so much about routers
Apr 06 17:47:42 * russell-- curious about bitbake as build infrastructure though
Apr 06 17:48:08 <russell--> seems like that's an orthogonal choice to target platform
Apr 06 17:48:10 <xMff> well from looking at the recipes and reading stuff here and there it seems to be horrible
Apr 06 17:48:15 <russell--> lol
Apr 06 17:48:33 <xMff> and slow
Apr 06 17:48:45 <blogic> you'll be back :)
Apr 06 17:48:46 <xMff> and if it breaks then in such a way that you have to debug for hours
Apr 06 17:48:55 <xMff> much like gnu autotools
Apr 06 17:49:21 <xMff> thats probably why its so popular... has the ability to save a lot of jobs in software engineering
Apr 06 17:49:27 <russell--> lol
Apr 06 17:49:57 <russell--> someday i'd like someone who understands it to walk me through the openwrt buildroot makefile hackery
Apr 06 17:50:22 <xMff> and from a distribution/release pov it is not better than openwrt, you have to fork and polish it to make a release out of it
Apr 06 17:50:41 <xMff> (OE, not bitbake)
Apr 06 17:50:45 <russell--> yeah
Apr 06 17:51:27 <blogic> its a totally different thing
Apr 06 17:51:34 <blogic> you cant compare the 2 things imho
Apr 06 17:58:24 <builder_> build #2 of x86 is complete: Failure [failed shell_12]  Build details are at http://tksite.gotdns.org:8010/builders/x86/builds/2
Apr 06 18:01:38 <Acinonyx> russell--: pong
Apr 06 18:02:52 <russell--> Acinonyx: /me not clear on why http://patchwork.midlink.org/patch/847/ got spiked
Apr 06 18:03:42 <Acinonyx> oh, yes. I wanted to ask you about that
Apr 06 18:04:32 <Acinonyx> where is the file you are trying to patch?
Apr 06 18:05:13 <russell--> the patch creates a file that doesn't exist before, but it ought to apply to feeds/packages
Apr 06 18:05:36 <russell--> i generated with patch with git format-patch
Apr 06 18:06:16 <Acinonyx> hmm
Apr 06 18:06:23 <Acinonyx> wait a moment.
Apr 06 18:06:29 * russell-- waits
Apr 06 18:06:34 <Acinonyx> because I think git am messed it up
Apr 06 18:07:37 <Acinonyx> thanks russell--
Apr 06 18:07:46 <russell--> np
Apr 06 18:08:06 * russell-- is quite capable of screwing things up
Apr 06 18:17:34 <Acinonyx> yeah it applies cleanly. apparently I was incorrectly using the -p0 parameter, leftover from a previous patch which needed it
Apr 06 18:21:08 <Acinonyx> thanks again
Apr 06 18:21:47 <russell--> awesome!
Apr 06 18:21:50 <russell--> thank you!
Apr 06 18:43:22 <philipp64|laptop> can we add xt_TRACE to ipt-core?
Apr 06 18:46:24 <builder_> build #1 of kirkwood is complete: Failure [failed compile_4]  Build details are at http://tksite.gotdns.org:8010/builders/kirkwood/builds/1
Apr 06 19:00:50 <builder_> build #1 of ixp4xx is complete: Failure [failed shell compile_4]  Build details are at http://tksite.gotdns.org:8010/builders/ixp4xx/builds/1
Apr 06 19:13:42 <builder_> build #1 of cobalt is complete: Failure [failed shell_12]  Build details are at http://tksite.gotdns.org:8010/builders/cobalt/builds/1
Apr 06 19:40:42 <CIA-83> acinonyx * r26501 /packages/Xorg/xorg/lib/libX11/patches/010-ignore-groff-warnings.patch:
Apr 06 19:40:43 <CIA-83> [packages] libX11: add a patch from ubuntu that lets libX11 build a postscript file using newer groff (thanks Russell Senior)
Apr 06 19:40:43 <CIA-83> This applies to the packages feed. It fixes a case with newer groff
Apr 06 19:40:43 <CIA-83> returning different warming messages than expected by the libX11 build
Apr 06 19:40:43 <CIA-83> infrastructure expects. This patch was shamelessly swiped from Ubuntu's
Apr 06 19:40:43 <CIA-83> package.
Apr 06 19:45:52 <philipp64|laptop> xMff: ping
Apr 06 19:51:43 <builder_> build #1 of etrax is complete: Failure [failed compile_3]  Build details are at http://tksite.gotdns.org:8010/builders/etrax/builds/1
Apr 06 19:58:13 <builder_> build #1 of au1000 is complete: Failure [failed compile_4]  Build details are at http://tksite.gotdns.org:8010/builders/au1000/builds/1
Apr 06 20:03:05 <philipp64|laptop> Kaloz: ping
Apr 06 20:44:45 <xMff> pong philipp64|laptop
Apr 06 20:50:26 <CIA-83> acinonyx * r26502 /packages/libs/avahi/Makefile: (log message trimmed)
Apr 06 20:50:26 <CIA-83> [packages] avahi: Update avahi to version 0.6.30 (ref Ticket 7424, , ipv6)
Apr 06 20:50:26 <CIA-83> This updates the avahi package to the latest version, 0.6.30.
Apr 06 20:50:26 <CIA-83> >From the avahi release notes:
Apr 06 20:50:26 <CIA-83> "This is a bugfix release.
Apr 06 20:50:26 <CIA-83> Make IPv6 work again
Apr 06 20:50:26 <CIA-83> i18n updates
Apr 06 20:50:29 <CIA-83> acinonyx * r26503 /trunk/package/block-mount/files/fsck.sh: (log message trimmed)
Apr 06 20:50:29 <CIA-83> [package] block-mount: fsck.sh should only call pi_include() if dir /lib/functions/fsck exists.
Apr 06 20:50:29 <CIA-83> /etc/functions.sh:pi_include() checks if the argument exists and prints
Apr 06 20:50:29 <CIA-83> a warning if not. To prevent this warning if package block-mount is installed
Apr 06 20:50:29 <CIA-83> but not package e2fsprogs, the script should check if this directory exists
Apr 06 20:50:30 <CIA-83> before calling pi_include()
Apr 06 20:50:30 <CIA-83> A wrong patch to suppress this warning was previously posted
Apr 06 20:50:39 <CIA-83> acinonyx * r26504 /trunk/package/madwifi/files/lib/wifi/madwifi.sh:
Apr 06 20:50:39 <CIA-83> [packages] madwifi: typo(s) in /lib/wifi/madwifi.sh
Apr 06 20:50:39 <CIA-83> Hi
Apr 06 20:50:39 <CIA-83> minrate and maxrate are acually not boolean, so, for example
Apr 06 20:50:39 <CIA-83> "config minrate 11000" in /etc/config/wireless has no effect.
Apr 06 20:50:39 <CIA-83> Signed-off by: Jan Hetges <tran@ms20.net>
Apr 06 20:51:08 <philipp64|laptop> xMff: I'll try your patch to the firewall in a bit when I get back... I've also patched netfilter.mk to enable xt_TRACE, which (along with that script I mailed you) is useful for figuring out rules.
Apr 06 20:51:20 <xMff> philipp64|laptop: indeed it is.
Apr 06 20:51:43 <philipp64|laptop> hopefully the patch I submitted will be accepted... it's 3 lines...
Apr 06 20:52:02 <xMff> philipp64|laptop: my patch will work but not yield the desired result as it will open port 22
Apr 06 20:52:04 <philipp64|laptop> are you going to commit your firewall fix, or wait until the full scope of changes is apparent?
Apr 06 20:52:37 <philipp64|laptop> ah.... so... how involved is the fix that doesn't do that?
Apr 06 20:52:53 <xMff> and as I mentioned yesterday a real fix is unlikely to happen as the correct rules for that would rely on extensions not guaranteed to be there
Apr 06 20:53:01 <xMff> like mark or connmark
Apr 06 20:53:14 <philipp64|laptop> that's not obvious...
Apr 06 20:53:41 <philipp64|laptop> let me look at how AIF did it, and get back to you.
Apr 06 20:54:01 <philipp64|laptop> I should be back in about 3 hours...
Apr 06 21:30:05 <builder_> build #1 of ramips is complete: Failure [failed shell_12]  Build details are at http://tksite.gotdns.org:8010/builders/ramips/builds/1
Apr 06 23:09:32 <tubaman> I'm getting a kernel panic with openwrt trunk on a E2100L when using USB storage.  Any ideas?
Apr 06 23:43:15 <philipp64|laptop> xMff: ping
Apr 07 00:20:08 <cshore> tubaman: what revision?
Apr 07 00:21:53 <cshore> ping acinonyx
Apr 07 00:41:18 <builder_> build #1 of avr32 is complete: Failure [failed shell_12]  Build details are at http://tksite.gotdns.org:8010/builders/avr32/builds/1
Apr 07 01:00:43 <CIA-83> cshore * r26505 /trunk/package/block-mount/files/fsck.sh: [package] block-mount: Reverting 26503. Was already fixed in a better way in commit 26474.
Apr 07 01:04:49 <philipp64|laptop> is there an easy way to set up a CF-based system to have a bootable image *and* a persistent overlay?
Apr 07 01:05:34 <cshore> philipp64: you'll have to partition and install grub by hand I think
Apr 07 01:05:56 <cshore> philipp64: or, actually, better idea
Apr 07 01:07:20 <cshore> philipp64|laptop: I suggest you use a combined image to create the inital partitions and grub, and then using fdisk to add a third partition (the combined image only use the space for the size of the image, so there will be the remaining space left for partitioning)
Apr 07 01:08:49 <cshore> philipp64|laptop: and then use extroot with the overlay being the partition you just just created (should be Xda3)
Apr 07 01:10:26 <cshore> philipp64|laptop: and after that don't use a combined image, but rather copy the rootfs or kernel to the partition rather than combined image to disk
Apr 07 01:10:40 <cshore> philipp64|laptop: (for upgrades)
Apr 07 01:15:45 <philipp64|laptop> there's no way to set up the build process to do this for me?
Apr 07 01:25:10 <cshore> not that I know about
Apr 07 01:26:57 <philipp64|laptop> cshore: btw, can you please commit http://patchwork.midlink.org/patch/850/ ?
Apr 07 01:42:43 <RealOpty> sup cshore
Apr 07 01:43:02 <cshore> hey RealOpty!
Apr 07 01:43:38 <RealOpty> hows it goin
Apr 07 01:43:42 <cshore> still thinking I'm going to get work done tonight
Apr 07 01:43:53 <cshore> but likely will be distracted by IRC all evening
Apr 07 01:46:18 <RealOpty> lol i hear that. looks like u got something done though
Apr 07 01:48:03 <cshore> A few things, lately
Apr 07 01:48:48 <cshore> OT: Is it just me or is eBay now the expensive place to by computers and electronics, if you can get them from other sources like online retailers?
Apr 07 01:50:52 <RealOpty> cant get any thing cheap there any more it sucks
Apr 07 01:53:38 <russell--> nbd: i finally checked atheros, iftop has the same problem there as brcm47xx
Apr 07 01:53:56 <russell--> (although it exited twice okay before failing)
**** ENDING LOGGING AT Thu Apr 07 02:59:59 2011