**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Fri Oct 14 02:59:57 2011
Oct 14 03:11:33 <swalker> is there a good reason why packages/multimedia/linux-uvc is still around?
Oct 14 03:13:44 <builder_> build #62 of rdc is complete: Failure [failed compile_7]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/rdc/builds/62
Oct 14 06:25:21 <builder_> build #85 of ps3 is complete: Failure [failed compile_2]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ps3/builds/85
Oct 14 09:29:07 <builder_> build #86 of pxcab is complete: Failure [failed compile_2]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/pxcab/builds/86
Oct 14 09:58:15 <builder_> build #93 of s3c24xx is complete: Failure [failed compile_10]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/s3c24xx/builds/93
Oct 14 10:08:36 <builder_> build #61 of mpc52xx is complete: Failure [failed compile_2]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/mpc52xx/builds/61
Oct 14 10:11:39 <CIA-62> nico * r28449 /packages/net/darkstat/Makefile:
Oct 14 10:11:39 <CIA-62> [packages] darkstat: fix build failure
Oct 14 10:11:39 <CIA-62> conv.c: In function 'strtonum':
Oct 14 10:11:39 <CIA-62> conv.c:487: error: 'LLONG_MIN' undeclared (first use in this function)
Oct 14 10:13:21 <CIA-62> nico * r28450 /branches/packages_10.03.1/net/darkstat/Makefile: [backfire/packages] darkstat: merge [28449]
Oct 14 10:57:49 <CIA-62> nico * r28451 /branches/packages_10.03.1/utils/lcd4linux/patches/ (5 files): [backfire/packages] lcd4linux: refresh patches
Oct 14 11:00:25 <CIA-62> nico * r28452 /branches/packages_10.03.1/utils/lcd4linux/patches/170-log2f.patch: [backfire/packages] lcd4linux: add fix for 'log2l/log2f' issue (closes: #8897)
Oct 14 11:03:00 <builder_> build #81 of ppc44x is complete: Failure [failed compile_2]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ppc44x/builds/81
Oct 14 11:46:29 <CIA-62> hcg * r28453 /trunk/package/udev/patches/0003-add_btn_trigger_happy_define.patch: [package] udev: Provide define to enable compilation with kernel 2.6.32.33 headers
Oct 14 12:39:09 <CIA-62> jow * r28454 /packages/net/wshaper/ (Makefile files/wshaper.config files/wshaper.htb):
Oct 14 12:39:09 <CIA-62> [PATCH] Wondershaper uci config and modules fix
Oct 14 12:39:09 <CIA-62> Hi,
Oct 14 12:39:09 <CIA-62> this patch adds uci config style for wshaper and also fixes a small
Oct 14 12:39:09 <CIA-62> problem with the loaded modules (act_police needs to be loaded).
Oct 14 12:39:09 <CIA-62> Signed-off-by: Manuel Munz <freifunk@somakoma.de>
Oct 14 12:45:04 <CIA-62> jow * r28455 /branches/packages_10.03.1/net/wshaper/ (Makefile files/wshaper.config files/wshaper.htb): [backfire/packages] merge r28454
Oct 14 13:25:26 <CIA-62> jow * r28456 /packages/net/wshaper/Makefile: [packages] wshaper: add a missing INSTALL_DIR
Oct 14 13:26:08 <CIA-62> jow * r28457 /branches/packages_10.03.1/net/wshaper/Makefile: [backfire/packages] wshaper: merge r28456
Oct 14 17:32:04 <tripolar> hi
Oct 14 21:07:00 * luka12345|wiik is happy to finally find second button for siemens sx763 board
Oct 14 21:10:46 <builder_> build #75 of avr32 is complete: Failure [failed compile_4]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/avr32/builds/75
Oct 14 22:43:11 <luka12345|wiik> does anyone know if there is a difference when including header files in kernel?
Oct 14 22:43:33 <luka12345|wiik> for example:
Oct 14 22:43:35 <luka12345|wiik> #include "linux/slab.h"
Oct 14 22:43:44 <luka12345|wiik> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
Oct 14 22:43:51 <luka12345|wiik> are in the same file
Oct 14 22:44:25 <luka12345|wiik> slab.h and platform_device.h are in include/linux/
Oct 14 22:44:52 <luka12345|wiik> and the .c file that includes them is not in include/linux/
Oct 14 22:45:11 <luka12345|wiik> code compiles without an error...
Oct 14 22:45:56 <luka12345|wiik> if it's all the same in the kernel, what is the 'right' approach <> or "" ?
Oct 14 23:00:54 <Chocks> you want <
Oct 14 23:01:05 <Chocks> the search order is different
Oct 14 23:01:29 <Chocks> moreover, you want the style that's in the kernel source already
Oct 14 23:02:22 <luka12345|wiik> and what when the header file is in arch/mips/include/asm/mach-lantiq for example
Oct 14 23:02:30 <luka12345|wiik> i still use <> ?
Oct 14 23:02:59 <Chocks> you want the style that's in the kernel source already
Oct 15 01:09:18 <CIA-62> jow * r28458 /trunk/package/opkg/ (Makefile patches/030-fix-double-free.patch): [package] opkg: fix a double free of pkg vectors when recursively removing packages due to --autoremove
Oct 15 01:10:00 <CIA-62> jow * r28459 /branches/backfire/package/opkg/ (Makefile patches/030-fix-double-free.patch): [backfire/packages] opkg: merge r28458
**** ENDING LOGGING AT Sat Oct 15 02:59:56 2011