**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Sun Oct 30 02:59:56 2011 Oct 30 03:00:33 in oneiric :( Oct 30 03:01:14 try FORCE=1 Oct 30 03:02:45 nvm, confused it with something else Oct 30 03:06:46 it's ok - I'm getting python2.5 Oct 30 03:11:47 crap - still not getting any info / makefile coming up Oct 30 03:12:39 jow_laptop: It kinda looks like the make i'm using can't handle dested define / endef Oct 30 03:14:12 paste it somewhere Oct 30 03:41:41 build #94 of ps3 is complete: Failure [failed compile_6] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ps3/builds/94 Oct 30 03:42:02 huh. just rebased my changes onto latest and it's gone. Oct 30 03:59:09 any idea why the main git openwrt repo from nbd is mirrored on GitHub, but not the packages? Oct 30 04:01:53 huh. got it. provided by battlemesh Oct 30 04:08:59 build #95 of orion is complete: Failure [failed compile_6] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/orion/builds/95 Oct 30 04:43:40 build #89 of ppc44x is complete: Failure [failed compile_4] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ppc44x/builds/89 Oct 30 05:29:56 KanjiMonster++ Oct 30 05:30:15 * russell-- just noticed the support for the rb493g Oct 30 05:48:35 build #97 of lantiq is complete: Failure [failed compile_6] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/lantiq/builds/97 Oct 30 05:50:00 KanjiMonster should do a wiki page for it though Oct 30 09:04:00 build #96 of cobalt is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/cobalt/builds/96 Oct 30 10:22:09 build #95 of ramips is complete: Failure [failed compile_6] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ramips/builds/95 Oct 30 11:19:16 * russell-- encounters a build error on a hardcoded /usr/bin/bunzip2. on the debian system here it's /bin/bunzip2 Oct 30 12:04:05 jow_laptop: next time someone asks for a serial console we can point them at this https://www.dealextreme.com/p/300bps-3mbps-usb-adapter-for-arduino-blue-silver-101483 Oct 30 12:21:50 Weedy: cool. But, it doesn't support JTAG, let alone its output is defaulted to 5V. Oct 30 12:27:05 uhh Oct 30 12:27:13 i said serial console Oct 30 12:49:48 also "Data port supports the switch between 5V and 3.3V electrical level " Oct 30 13:12:19 juhosg * r28678 /trunk/target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/lib/upgrade/platform.sh: Oct 30 13:12:19 ar71xx/sysupgrade: use $magic_long instead of $magic when comparing with a 32-bit value Oct 30 13:12:19 Aparently $magic_long was meant here instead of $magic when comparing with Oct 30 13:12:19 32-bit values. Oct 30 13:12:19 Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle Oct 30 13:37:37 hi Oct 30 13:37:40 ping nbd Oct 30 13:37:47 pong Oct 30 13:38:09 nbd could you apply my openssl, libevent and brcm47xx 3.1 patch ? Oct 30 13:38:34 not right now Oct 30 13:38:43 (not at home) Oct 30 13:38:58 but it would be nice if you could do it later :) Oct 30 13:39:18 i don't think it'll get around to it today Oct 30 13:39:23 so maybe ask somebody else Oct 30 13:40:13 jow * r28679 /branches/backfire/package/qos-scripts/ (Makefile files/usr/lib/qos/generate.sh): [backfire] qos-scripts: prefix was missing in some rules after backport, add it (#10315) Oct 30 13:48:10 jow could you apply them? Oct 30 13:48:35 brcm47xx is Haukes field Oct 30 13:49:09 Hauke: can you apply my brcm47xx 3.1 patch? Oct 30 13:49:18 and hauke planned to wait for 3.2 Oct 30 13:49:41 jow_laptop but i also submitted patches for libevent,openssl and tor Oct 30 13:50:36 jow_laptop: why does he want to wait for 3.2? Oct 30 13:51:51 tripolar: my plan was to leave 3.1 out and go to 3.2-rcX when it is released, as an "unstable" trunk kernel. Oct 30 13:53:57 I want to bring the patches for the flash chips connection and some other parts for the brcm4716 SoCs into the mainline kernel and they still need some work, having many kenrel version there increases the work if I change some api used by a package. Oct 30 13:54:23 tripolar: or are there any new features in 3.1 you need on brcm47xx, that would be a reason to use it Oct 30 13:59:19 no i just updated it to 3.1 because 3.1 came out :) Oct 30 13:59:56 Hauke: and the patch wasnt that much work . only a few hunks need some manual tweeking Oct 30 14:00:28 tripolar: and it boots? Oct 30 14:00:34 yes Oct 30 14:00:49 im using it for 5 days by now without a problem Oct 30 14:04:12 juhosg * r28680 /branches/backfire/target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/etc/uci-defaults/wndr3700: Oct 30 14:04:12 backfire: ar71xx: add WNDR3700 USB LED definition (backport from r24468) Oct 30 14:04:12 Signed-off-by: Hannu Nyman Oct 30 14:23:04 updated openwrt/upstream, https://home.comcast.net/~sdwalker/uscan/index.html Oct 30 14:26:21 build #92 of rb532 is complete: Failure [failed compile_6] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/rb532/builds/92 Oct 30 15:34:20 build #87 of uml is complete: Failure [failed compile_6] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/uml/builds/87 Oct 30 15:40:37 build #82 of ixp4xx is complete: Failure [failed compile_6] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ixp4xx/builds/82 Oct 30 15:54:03 jow * r28681 /trunk/package/base-files/files/lib/upgrade/common.sh: [package] base-files: fix typo Oct 30 15:55:49 build #95 of pxcab is complete: Failure [failed compile_10] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/pxcab/builds/95 Oct 30 17:53:01 mazilo * r28682 /packages/net/freeswitch/ (4 files in 2 dirs): git update Oct 30 18:08:14 build #80 of kirkwood is complete: Failure [failed compile_6] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/kirkwood/builds/80 Oct 30 18:52:38 mb * r28683 /trunk/target/linux/omap24xx/patches-3.1/ (8 files): omap24xx: Fix n810 boot Oct 30 19:17:17 nico * r28684 /packages/libs/json-c/: packages: remove empty json-c (thanks to Raphael Huck) Oct 30 19:20:56 build #103 of at91 is complete: Failure [failed compile_4] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/at91/builds/103 Oct 30 19:45:40 I just submitted patchwork #1540 with two different attachments... one for 3.0 and one for 2.6.39... but it only seemed to pick up one of them... the other just shows up as a comment. do I need to send separate emails for each kernel version? Oct 30 19:51:54 build #101 of ubicom32 is complete: Failure [failed compile_3] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ubicom32/builds/101 Oct 30 20:25:09 build #82 of ar71xx is complete: Failure [failed compile_6] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ar71xx/builds/82 Oct 30 20:37:36 mb * r28685 /trunk/target/linux/omap24xx/patches-3.1/ (4 files): omap24xx: Fix n810 LCD initialization Oct 30 22:46:09 mb * r28686 /packages/Xorg/app/pwrtray/Makefile: pwrtray: Disable xevrep for now. Doesn't seem to work on our Xlib. Oct 30 22:47:52 mb * r28687 /trunk/target/linux/omap24xx/Makefile: omap24xx: Default to linux-3.1 Oct 30 23:03:33 acinonyx * r28688 /trunk/tools/firmware-utils/ (Makefile src/mkedimaximg.c): [tools] Add firmware tool for generating factory images for Edimax devices Oct 30 23:17:11 build #77 of au1000 is complete: Failure [failed compile_6] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/au1000/builds/77 Oct 31 01:39:34 build #68 of mpc52xx is complete: Failure [failed compile_6] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/mpc52xx/builds/68 **** ENDING LOGGING AT Mon Oct 31 02:59:56 2011