**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Fri Aug 31 03:00:00 2012 Aug 31 06:43:21 boy, serious crickets! Aug 31 06:45:34 ß Aug 31 06:45:35 ? Aug 31 19:02:49 jow_laptop: so there's nothing special required for sysupgrade? just the squashfs-combined? Aug 31 19:03:16 yes Aug 31 19:03:31 or ext combined Aug 31 19:03:38 switch from one to the other should work as well Aug 31 19:08:37 ok. thanks. Aug 31 19:09:03 I noticed some months ago you changed the way that the firewall interacted with the linux-igd v1 stuff. Aug 31 19:09:24 so I'm thinking that the linux-igd v2 package I'm proposing might need similar work. Aug 31 19:10:32 also looking for someone who can try out the package besides me. Aug 31 19:10:35 no I just ported it to the new shell api for network config Aug 31 19:10:41 ah, ok. Aug 31 19:10:48 to find lan & wan ifaces Aug 31 19:11:00 didn't the ruleset name also change? Aug 31 19:11:12 not according to the changelog Aug 31 19:11:27 ok. must be getting senile. Aug 31 19:11:52 been head-down working on Poco 1.5 (upcoming) with a bunch of portability fixes for BSD and Linux. Aug 31 19:12:07 haven't had much time to refamiliarize with OpenWRT. Aug 31 19:12:21 too much neuron thrashing. :-( Aug 31 19:12:49 (also added Net::Route and Net::NatPmpClient classes to Poco...) Aug 31 19:13:26 I'll try the sysupgrade stuff tonight or over the weekend. Aug 31 19:13:33 you still playing with an Alix box? Aug 31 19:13:51 not these days Aug 31 19:14:06 didn't do much openwrt stuff during the last few months Aug 31 19:14:13 oh, who maintains eglibc? is that still felix? Aug 31 19:14:13 I am slowly getting up to speed again Aug 31 19:14:21 I tihnk so, not sure Aug 31 19:14:24 (must be a summer-time phenomenon... :-) Aug 31 19:14:58 ok, I have a couple of trivial eglibc dependency fixes... I'll ask him to have a look. Aug 31 19:15:13 librt ? Aug 31 19:15:18 yup. Aug 31 19:15:25 2600 and 2601. Aug 31 19:15:30 I suggested to make libpthread & librt defaut dependencies for eglibc Aug 31 19:15:37 similar to how libc already is a default dependency Aug 31 19:15:56 the majority of packages need it anyway and eglic users are usually not worried about size constraints Aug 31 19:16:32 well, that's a rewrite above my pay-grade. Aug 31 19:16:33 imo this is cleaner than adding +USE_EGLIBC:librt to any 2nd package Aug 31 19:17:00 it probably is, but... I don't want to be stuck in the war about image sizes. Aug 31 19:17:32 besides, it was my (mistaken?) belief that if you link to a library that ends up not having any referenced symbols, then that library gets pruned anyway. no? Aug 31 19:17:57 so including an unreferenced library should have no associated cost. Aug 31 19:18:50 no runtime costs, yes Aug 31 19:19:10 ok. Aug 31 19:19:24 sounds like a trivial fix, then. Aug 31 19:22:25 http://pastebin.com/45tr5bKS Aug 31 19:22:33 thats probably all Aug 31 19:30:53 building... Aug 31 19:30:57 worked for diffutils Aug 31 19:39:58 worked for ntpd ... now rebuilding entire tree. **** ENDING LOGGING AT Sat Sep 01 03:00:01 2012