**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Fri Apr 12 02:59:58 2013 Apr 12 03:11:01 build #183 of gemini is complete: Failure [failed compile_8] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/gemini/builds/183 Apr 12 04:45:44 w Apr 12 07:36:15 build #219 of rb532 is complete: Failure [failed shell_12] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/rb532/builds/219 Apr 12 07:39:32 build #219 of ppc44x is complete: Failure [failed shell_12] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ppc44x/builds/219 Apr 12 08:03:55 anyone knows why there is no nand in snapshots/trunk/ar71xx/ ? Apr 12 09:21:25 build #246 of orion is complete: Failure [failed compile_8] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/orion/builds/246 Apr 12 09:44:36 luka r36316 packages/ utils/xz/patches utils/xz/Makefile utils/xz/patches/010-compile.patch utils/xz * [packages] xz: add new package Apr 12 09:44:38 luka r36317 packages/utils/squashfs-tools/ Config.in Makefile * [packages] squashfs-tools: modularize package Apr 12 10:05:34 build #209 of sibyte is complete: Failure [failed shell_12] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/sibyte/builds/209 Apr 12 10:07:19 hi Apr 12 10:10:43 anyone knows why a compilation of a package throws an error when I have a patch but not whithout it? Apr 12 10:10:45 the Makefile: http://84.88.85.59/libvirt/Makefile.txt Apr 12 10:10:45 the patch: http://84.88.85.59/libvirt/000-ip_iptables_path_fix_v0_9_9.patch.txt Apr 12 10:10:45 the log compiling with the patch: http://84.88.85.59/libvirt/LIBVIRTPATCH.txt Apr 12 10:10:45 the log of compilation without patches folder: http://84.88.85.59/libvirt/LIBVIRTNOPATCH.txt Apr 12 10:11:22 thanks in advance Apr 12 10:17:10 i'd suggest making clean build logs of both and running a diff on them Apr 12 10:17:39 LIBVIRTNOPATCH.txt is clean, LIBVIRTPATCH.txt isn't Apr 12 10:18:16 build #214 of xburst is complete: Failure [failed shell_12] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/xburst/builds/214 Apr 12 11:32:56 blogic: for ath5k in AA is needed to swap the eeprom bytes or the is ath cal data more or less the same for ath5k and ath9k? Apr 12 11:34:49 don't answer, stupid question Apr 12 11:34:54 sorry Apr 12 14:38:18 luka r36318 packages/net/strongswan/Makefile * [packages] strongswan: add eap-radius plugin Apr 12 15:06:25 luka r36319 packages/net/strongswan/ Makefile files/ipsec.init * [packages] strongswan: add init script Apr 12 15:23:19 build #219 of avr32 is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/avr32/builds/219 Apr 12 16:11:33 blogic: a little question, in AA does the arv4519pw wifi work or not? Apr 12 16:19:49 this time is not a stupid question Apr 12 17:10:03 build #169 of octeon is complete: Failure [failed shell_12] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/octeon/builds/169 Apr 12 17:10:53 Delboy: does the ath5k work in the arv4519 in AA? Apr 12 17:12:46 or still the stupid message: ath5k: phy0: failed to warm reset the MAC Chip Apr 12 17:25:26 bump. seems that there is nobody here to answer a little question :( Apr 12 17:31:57 nobody here with your wifi chipset at least Apr 12 17:32:54 ar2417? Apr 12 17:33:01 lots of folks here, but, nobody here knows the answer right off Apr 12 17:33:27 ok, sorry Apr 12 17:33:44 I don't have any of those types of boards Apr 12 17:34:01 no more questions about very old hardware Apr 12 17:34:01 ar2317? Apr 12 17:34:17 you said arv4519 before, Apr 12 17:34:24 what board to you really mean? Apr 12 17:34:33 it's not that nobody will answer, nobody here knows offhand, but, may well be somebody show up in a while that does know Apr 12 17:34:56 the arv4518 and 4519 are very similar Apr 12 17:34:57 Ginkgo: you might have more luck on the openwrt-development mailing list Apr 12 17:36:20 ok, thanks Apr 12 17:37:14 only needed a little answer like: could not help in this moment Apr 12 17:37:49 lets time to dig deeper in the Lantiq code Apr 12 17:40:31 roh: ping Apr 12 17:40:41 roh: is lynxis on irc ? Apr 12 17:40:49 pong :( Apr 12 17:40:50 and if so what nick does he use ? Apr 12 17:53:24 Has anyone heard from Claudio Mignanti, the AT91 maintainer? Apr 12 17:53:41 I've tried to contact him multiple times but I've never heard back :_( Apr 12 17:53:58 I'm in the process of updating the AT91 target to 3.8.6 Apr 12 17:56:03 aport: ok Apr 12 17:56:06 sounds good Apr 12 17:56:17 will you maintain the target in future ? :) Apr 12 17:56:23 that is i guess the requirement Apr 12 17:56:43 I'd be happy to Apr 12 17:56:43 at91 needs a maintainer ;) Apr 12 17:56:54 well, make patches and mail them Apr 12 17:56:58 yessir Apr 12 17:57:06 if there are many patches put them in a git tree somewhere Apr 12 17:57:18 that makes the review easier i guess Apr 12 17:57:27 what board are you using for development ? Apr 12 17:57:38 it's pretty light... only one removed platform patch and some fixed up .configs Apr 12 17:57:48 9g20 Apr 12 17:57:58 ok Apr 12 18:02:45 Blogic: in AA does ath5k worked in any board? Apr 12 18:13:29 blogic: in AA does ath5k worked in any board and how many pci clocks has the Danube? Apr 12 18:16:30 how many clocks the Danube has?* Apr 12 18:23:55 hay que joderse... Apr 12 18:31:10 juhosg r36320 trunk/target/linux/mpc85xx/config-3.8 * mpc85xx: Add P1020RDB board support Apr 12 18:31:11 juhosg r36321 trunk/target/linux/mpc85xx/image/Makefile * mpc85xx: Generate fdt for P1020RDB Apr 12 18:31:12 juhosg r36322 trunk/target/linux/mpc85xx/base-files/lib/preinit/05_set_preinit_iface_mpc85xx * mpc85xx: set preinit interface to eth0 by default Apr 12 18:56:53 blogic r36323 trunk/target/linux/generic/files/drivers/net/phy/rtl8366s.c * [geneirc] fix rtl8366s OF binding Apr 12 18:57:24 blogic r36324 trunk/target/linux/ramips/dts/rt2880.dtsi * [ramips] update rt2880.dtsi Apr 12 18:57:32 blogic r36325 trunk/target/linux/ ramips/dts/RT-N15.dts ramips/image/Makefile * [ramips] fix RT-N15 support Apr 12 18:57:40 blogic r36326 trunk/target/linux/ ramips/patches-3.8/0107-MIPS-ralink-adds-support-for-RT2880-SoC-family.patch ramips/patches-3.8/0133-MIPS-ralink-make-early_printk-work-on-RT2880.patch * [ramips] fix up the rt2880 patches Apr 12 18:57:49 blogic r36327 trunk/target/linux/ramips/rt288x/config-3.8 * [ramips] update rt2880 config-3.8 Apr 12 19:06:11 wifi working in teh arv4518pw, driver ath5k: http://pastebin.com/8JCVqgeK Apr 12 19:06:21 the* Apr 12 19:06:30 in AA Apr 12 19:09:04 This ticket will be outdated when the patch was applied in AA: https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/11704 Apr 12 19:09:16 blogic: thanks for the help Apr 12 19:16:07 now, how to test the wifi stability in the arv4518pw? Apr 12 19:16:42 connect a bunch of clients and start iperfing Apr 12 19:17:40 i'm a newbie: which iperf parameters? Apr 12 19:45:28 juhosg r36328 trunk/target/linux/generic/patches-3.8/033-backport-spi-of-Use-DT-aliases-for-assigning-bus-number.patch * linux/3.8: backport 'spi/of: Use DT aliases for assigning bus number' from 3.9 Apr 12 19:45:29 juhosg r36329 trunk/target/linux/mpc85xx/patches-3.8/140-powerpc-85xx-tl-wdr4900-v1-support.patch * mpc85xx: use static SPI bus number for TL-WDR4900 Apr 12 20:29:38 Delboy: ping Apr 12 20:30:19 pong Apr 12 20:52:32 Ginkgo: pong Apr 12 21:12:30 kerneis r36330 packages/net/babel/Makefile * [packages] babeld: new upstream release 1.3.5 Apr 12 23:51:00 So device tree looks pretty neat... seems like on MIPS you guys are patching the dtb straight into the kernel image? Apr 13 00:11:09 Why this patch has a cut i the second part of it? http://patchwork.openwrt.org/patch/3554/ Apr 13 00:11:31 :( **** ENDING LOGGING AT Sat Apr 13 02:59:58 2013