**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Sun May 11 03:00:00 2014 May 11 03:21:40 <5EXAA8SU8> build #615 of brcm47xx is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/brcm47xx/builds/615 May 11 04:40:10 has anyone here modified a wndr3700v2/wndr3800 for a 4 antenna setup? May 11 04:48:47 <5EXAA8SU8> build #570 of uml is complete: Failure [failed compile_8] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/uml/builds/570 May 11 05:02:15 nbd r40749 trunk/package/kernel/broadcom-wl/files/lib/wifi/broadcom.sh * broadcom-wl: bring interfaces up, do not rely on netifd doing it May 11 06:34:58 <5EXAA8SU8> build #605 of atheros is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/atheros/builds/605 May 11 06:44:08 <5EXAA8SU8> build #636 of brcm63xx is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/brcm63xx/builds/636 May 11 07:02:00 <5EXAA8SU8> build #590 of ramips is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ramips/builds/590 May 11 08:27:03 gnutls build failure, on missing /usr/bin/gnutls-cli and gnutls-serv May 11 08:29:08 patch is on patchwork iirc May 11 08:30:07 swalker: danke May 11 09:48:52 <5EXAA8SU8> build #56 of x86_64 is complete: Failure [failed compile_1] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/x86_64/builds/56 May 11 10:28:37 anyone else having issues with spidev? https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2014-May/025350.html May 11 11:19:57 I had a very odd situation with my 3 OpenWrt routers in my house May 11 11:20:25 all routers at some point changed their wpa2 passphrase to the root user's password May 11 11:20:47 must have happened through a recent trunk build as I usually keep them in sync with latest trunk May 11 11:21:17 the really weird thing is: most clients could still connect using the actual wpa2 passphrase rather than the root password May 11 12:15:08 <5EXAA8SU8> build #270 of mpc85xx is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/mpc85xx/builds/270 May 11 13:30:59 tripolar r40750 packages/net/git/Makefile * [packages] git: update to 1.9.3 May 11 15:18:15 <5EXAA8SU8> build #606 of orion is complete: Failure [failed compile_8] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/orion/builds/606 May 11 17:15:57 <5EXAA8SU8> build #56 of mpc83xx is complete: Failure [failed compile_8] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/mpc83xx/builds/56 May 11 17:17:37 when I try to compile dnsmasq I get this error -> dnssec.c:22:24: fatal error: nettle/rsa.h: No such file or directory #include ^compilation terminated. May 11 17:17:44 how do I change the path? May 11 17:17:49 I see some info here -> https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?pid=148259#p148259 May 11 17:17:51 but I can't get it work May 11 17:19:38 ok, this is strange -> https://github.com/dtaht/ceropackages-3.10/blob/master/libs/nettle/ May 11 17:36:43 aversario, install nettle and gmp if you want dnsmasq with dnssec support May 11 18:13:11 <5EXAA8SU8> build #561 of rb532 is complete: Failure [failed shell shell_10 shell_15] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/rb532/builds/561 May 11 18:15:23 <5EXAA8SU8> build #561 of ppc44x is complete: Failure [failed shell_10] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ppc44x/builds/561 May 11 18:37:55 <5EXAA8SU8> build #530 of sibyte is complete: Failure [failed shell_10] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/sibyte/builds/530 May 11 18:38:52 hi all! May 11 18:39:48 nbd jow_laptop at some point on the file i am editing in netifd i use ETH_P_8021AD that i include from linux header May 11 18:40:18 the problem is that that file is a part that i understood shoulb be system indipendent May 11 18:40:26 should i redefine the macro? May 11 18:47:16 <_trine> Mazilo, hey May 11 18:53:08 g10h4ck: #ifdef linux #include #else #ifndef ETH_P_8021AD #define ETH_P_8021AD #endif #endif May 11 19:02:16 nbd in the end i defined an enum in system.h May 11 19:02:35 enum vlan_proto { May 11 19:02:35 VLAN_PROTO_8021Q = 0x8100, May 11 19:02:35 VLAN_PROTO_8021AD = 0x88A8 May 11 19:02:35 }; May 11 19:02:40 it seemed more elegant May 11 19:03:09 what do you prefer the one you writed or the one with the enum ? May 11 19:03:33 nbd: May 11 19:17:07 nbd according to this commit http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=8ad227ff89a7e6f05d07cd0acfd95ed3a24450ca May 11 19:17:46 there should be IFLA_VLAN_PROTOCOL inside linux/if_link.h but it is not true in my computer May 11 19:18:18 i have linux kernel 3.12.13 is it possible is too old ? May 11 19:18:34 or maybe that definition was removed in subequent commit ? May 11 19:18:45 i am going to take a look to linux source May 11 19:20:12 in fresh downloaded source it is defined May 11 19:20:14 mmmmmmm May 11 19:20:24 i have to upgrade my kernel... May 11 19:21:14 or maybe not because on openwrt there is 3.10 and it is working... May 11 19:21:22 what's going on ? May 11 19:22:11 so it's missing on your computer if you build netifd outside of openwrt? May 11 19:23:29 yes i am buildin on my machine before pushing to avoid push sintax errors and similar stuff... May 11 19:23:48 maybe your system was built with kernel headers from an old kerenl May 11 19:23:55 which is typical on many distributions May 11 19:24:04 i still didn't tested if in openwrt is working or not May 11 19:24:34 on openwrt it will use the kernel headers from the kernel version used for the target May 11 19:37:55 nbd i believe you are right i have kernel 3.12 but header 3.9 hopefully on gentoo you can install the header you need so i am updating to 3.12 also for header May 11 19:38:20 please make sure your code compiles with older kernels as well May 11 19:38:24 (without the feature in that case) May 11 19:41:30 well 802.1ad was introduced in recent kernel May 11 19:41:44 how can i check the kernel version in at compile time ? May 11 19:41:51 i mead there is some macro i can check ? May 11 19:42:14 is IFLA_VLAN_PROTOCOL defined via #define? May 11 19:42:35 nbd no it is an enum May 11 19:45:20 in the same commit some define is added like NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_STAG_TX_BIT but i believe it is very dirty to use those apparently unrelated macro to check for the version May 11 19:46:09 you could try CheckSymbolExists from http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/CMake:How_To_Write_Platform_Checks May 11 19:49:23 i am looking at it thanks ;) May 11 19:51:49 the idea is to define a macro if the symbol exist so i can check on the source code right ? May 11 19:58:19 correct May 11 20:05:27 * broadcom-wl: bring interfaces up, do not rely on netifd doing it => does this commit mean broadcom-wl is still messy? May 11 20:09:29 it's broadcom-wl, how could it be anything other than messy? ;) May 11 20:11:52 updated openwrt/upstream, https://home.comcast.net/~sdwalker/uscan/index.html May 11 20:12:26 * groz detects some attitude toward broadcom May 11 20:12:36 :) May 11 20:17:28 heh... May 11 20:17:31 i saw that May 11 20:17:35 it's funny how everything seems to work well with netifd, except broadcom-wl which has to manage its own interfaces May 11 20:17:53 it can either be a good thing or a bad thing May 11 20:18:02 likely bad.. May 11 20:18:04 good thing , if it always works, then you dont have to write code to make it work May 11 20:18:16 more than likely somthing is bad, or doesnt work, and then.. you have no control.. so its bad. May 11 20:19:18 I think netifd was meant to manage all interfaces for all platforms, broadcom comes to be the exception, exceptions are hard to maintain May 11 20:19:34 yeah dev, i'd like to stay positive and say its a good thing, like... like if it was my clutch in my car.. ill let it work the clutch-plate.. i dont want to break anything myself May 11 20:20:12 yeah -- where it could ( i dont know the broadcom-wl code ) take an interface up or take it down.. where netifd is designed to simply prevent that May 11 20:21:26 looking at the code quality of the belkin guy, it's hard to stay positive with anything related to broadcom or broadcom based devices.. May 11 20:21:26 i cant really argue no control is better than control.. for obvious reasons. May 11 20:21:46 hoooly shit... [01/30] patches etc.. May 11 20:22:15 you guys worry to much, just give it to nbd, he'll fix it, he can fix anything May 11 20:22:17 :) May 11 20:22:32 har har. May 11 20:22:33 he can, but he just don't have the time to fix it May 11 20:22:52 and he needs to have a life as well heh May 11 20:22:58 * groz thinks you need to watch north american television occaisionally to get that pun May 11 20:23:00 clearly the point was for the belkin ppl to do the integration, not the openwrt ppl to do the integration May 11 20:23:16 hehe yeah its IRC so... tone is tough to catch sometimes May 11 20:23:38 tv commercial, used to be annoyingly common 'give it to mikee, mikee will eat anything' May 11 20:23:45 ooooh.... kix? May 11 20:23:52 they are trying, in one hand that's good, but on the other hand 99% needs to be reworked.. May 11 20:24:17 pfft dam dev May 11 20:24:42 usually the last %1 of a project takes the longest, but that seems like, they are just getting their feet wet May 11 20:26:58 exactly May 11 20:27:27 I hope the guy doesn't get upset and stop trying to get his code merged.. May 11 20:28:13 nbd this CHECK_SYMBOL_EXISTS(IFLA_VLAN_PROTOCOL "linux/if_link.h" HAVE_IFLA_VLAN_PROTOCOL) more this #ifdef HAVE_IFLA_VLAN_PROTOCOL should do it right ? May 11 20:29:13 fuck that -- i hope belkin doesnt burden the openwrt devs! May 11 20:29:42 yup May 11 20:29:44 that too May 11 20:30:06 hehe... i've got more faith in openwrt than i do in a company that specialized in making cables.. not routers.. May 11 20:30:20 openwrt should create a brand and start selling routers :P May 11 20:30:24 was the R&D done on the AC router mostly linksys? May 11 20:30:33 pfft hell no May 11 20:30:38 hehee May 11 20:30:44 ur pulling my leg nwow May 11 20:30:57 *sigh* hang loose ill be back, workin on openwrt, of course.. May 11 20:31:11 may be u want to help test some packages on ur router? :) May 11 20:31:41 me? sure.. the patch I was waiting for just got to the patchwork today May 11 20:32:23 aaah werd? May 11 20:32:57 for mtd? or somthing? May 11 20:33:11 Rebooting system... May 11 20:33:23 this one: [PATCH] [ramips] add seama image can be upgrade by sysupgrade May 11 20:33:42 aah, ic May 11 20:34:18 sysupgrade seama images didn't contain seama header, so when it get accepted, it will :) May 11 20:50:22 nbd i got the interface created May 11 20:51:03 but it seems that the macro is not defined so i believe CHECK_SYMBOL_EXISTS works different than i thought May 11 20:52:49 CHECK_SYMBOL_EXISTS only defines a cmake variable May 11 20:52:55 it doesn't automatically add a define May 11 20:53:10 how to add a define ? May 11 20:53:40 well i am looking at strackoverflow ;) May 11 20:53:57 IF(VARIABLE) ADD_DEFINITIONS(-DHAVE_VLAN_PROTOCOL) ENDIF() May 11 20:54:37 thanks ;) May 11 20:55:25 so this should be enough in my case May 11 20:55:27 INCLUDE(CheckSymbolExists) May 11 20:55:27 CHECK_SYMBOL_EXISTS(IFLA_VLAN_PROTOCOL "linux/if_link.h" HAVE_IFLA_VLAN_PROTOCOL) May 11 20:55:28 IF(HAVE_IFLA_VLAN_PROTOCOL) ADD_DEFINITIONS(-DHAVE_VLAN_PROTOCOL) ENDIF() May 11 21:16:26 nbd i am not understanding if check symbol works with enum or not http://www.vtkedge.org/Bug/bug_relationship_graph.php?bug_id=11685&graph=dependency&orientation=vertical May 11 21:27:26 on #cmake they sey it is not working May 11 21:33:51 <5EXAA8SU8> build #540 of avr32 is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/avr32/builds/540 May 11 21:40:31 g10h4ck I'm not aware of your entire case, but isn't easier to post an RFC on the mailing list and someone can help you there? May 11 21:43:59 it's not RFC yet :p May 11 21:44:42 btw the code is here https://gitorious.org/netifd/gsoc2014-netifd/source/6c7d308ee9497de5f7ae4463fb1fe98e7b4ae03b: May 11 21:45:35 if you are interested i can give mroe details ;) May 11 21:52:39 unfortunately I can't code a simple helloworld May 11 21:53:02 :p May 11 21:53:19 strange to see you on *-devel, isn't it ? May 11 21:58:03 I came here looking for help on porting a device, then I thought this channel was nice as I could see the latest development stuff May 11 21:58:29 it's great to see where a project is heading May 11 22:02:37 yep May 11 22:07:09 I usually idle here and stay quiet May 11 22:43:35 luka r40751 trunk/package/utils/ubi-utils/Makefile * [package] ubi-utils: fix typo May 11 22:43:36 luka r40752 trunk/package/kernel/linux/modules/other.mk * kernel: other.mk: add thermal option May 11 23:00:26 I just tried to update FreeSWITCH package and the 'git push' gave me this error message (http://pastebin.com/FPy2PsJT). :( May 11 23:00:29 <5EXAA8SU8> build #468 of iop32x is complete: Failure [failed shell_10] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/iop32x/builds/468 May 12 02:48:11 <5EXAA8SU8> build #607 of orion is complete: Failure [failed compile_8] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/orion/builds/607 **** ENDING LOGGING AT Mon May 12 02:59:59 2014