**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Wed May 14 03:00:00 2014 May 14 05:07:09 <5EXAA8SU8> build #573 of uml is complete: Failure [failed shell compile_8] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/uml/builds/573 May 14 06:32:02 <5EXAA8SU8> build #609 of orion is complete: Failure [failed compile_8] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/orion/builds/609 May 14 06:36:35 <5EXAA8SU8> build #510 of ar71xx is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ar71xx/builds/510 May 14 07:03:46 cyrus r40759 trunk/package/network/ services/dnsmasq/Makefile services/dnsmasq/patches * dnsmasq: bump to 2.7.0 May 14 08:24:52 <5EXAA8SU8> build #162 of mxs is complete: Failure [failed shell] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/mxs/builds/162 May 14 09:57:21 hauke r40760 trunk/target/linux/generic/config-3.14 * kernel-3.14: add missing config symbols May 14 10:03:04 zajec: ping May 14 10:09:39 hauke r40761 trunk/target/linux/brcm47xx/image/Makefile * brcm47xx: image: document some defines arguments May 14 10:10:13 hauke r40762 trunk/target/linux/brcm47xx/image/Makefile * brcm47xx: image: respect device flash block size May 14 10:10:48 hauke r40763 trunk/target/linux/ (12 files) * brcm47xx: profiles: fix white spaces (s/ $//) May 14 10:23:36 hauke r40764 trunk/package/kernel/button-hotplug/Makefile * button-hotplug: describe module a bit better & mention gpio-button-hotplug May 14 10:24:05 hauke r40765 trunk/package/kernel/gpio-button-hotplug/Makefile * gpio-button-hotplug: fix (and extend) package description May 14 10:34:04 Hauke: pong May 14 10:34:28 Hauke: a lot of my patches, thank you! May 14 10:36:53 Hauke: do you have some script for replying with these "Thank you for the patch, it was committed in"? ;) May 14 10:37:12 zajec: no not yet ;-) May 14 11:20:25 jow r40766 trunk/package/ system/opkg/Makefile system/opkg/patches/100-add-force-checksum.patch May 14 11:20:25 opkg: introduce a --force-checksum cmdline flag to be ale to ignore mismatching md5sums May 14 12:30:54 jow r40767 trunk/target/imagebuilder/Makefile * imagebuilder: bundle dtc (#12953, #14741) May 14 13:29:43 hi, back once more May 14 13:33:19 when you put a folder at target/linux, you say it's a Target system May 14 13:34:46 If I plan to integrate a zynq based board, should I create a target system for each board? May 14 13:35:47 no, one target for the soc family May 14 13:36:00 then subtargets or profiles for specific boards May 14 13:36:49 ok May 14 13:37:48 we usually try to use the same kernel across a range of boards May 14 13:37:57 this is achived by patching the cmdline in the final kernel binary May 14 13:38:03 and if I have different chipsets that could be used (i.e. http://www.xilinx.com/products/silicon-devices/soc/zynq-7000/silicon-devices/index.htm ) May 14 13:38:19 to .e.g pass a board=xxx parameter which lets the kernel choose the right mach file at runtime May 14 13:38:27 jow_laptop: in my case, xilinx has an integration fork of linux May 14 13:38:42 oh ok May 14 13:39:02 Hauke: sent my RFC patchset May 14 13:39:07 Hauke: I wonder what you will say May 14 13:39:15 Hauke: i was talking with nbd some time ago May 14 13:39:18 I had thought about creating a patch from their build, but wondered if I could just checkout their source directly May 14 13:39:20 Hauke: (I think it was him) May 14 13:39:33 Hauke: he suggested we should use separated configs for MIPS R1 and R2 May 14 13:40:32 txomon: if you intend to upstream the support for it to openwrt then the support needs to come in the form of patches May 14 13:41:00 openwrt fetches a vanilla kernel and applies a range of patches to it to add anything required for particular target uspport May 14 13:41:27 there are two series of patches; generic ones to add common stuff (e.g. netfilter modification) and target specific ones, e.g. to add support for a new soc family May 14 13:42:08 so, the way to do this, thought they have their own fork, integrated with linux, would be to manually update the patch May 14 13:42:09 entirely new files (e.g. new device drivers introduced through patches) are added as files and only the stuff needed to register them with kconfig is shipped as patch May 14 13:42:38 well, for a first approach, I will just make a big patch May 14 13:42:49 then I will tidy it up May 14 13:44:24 yeah, sounds like a good plan May 14 13:44:34 often you can also leave out a lot of unrelated changes May 14 13:45:17 not sure how will the xilinx fork is maintained but some vendors hacking linux tend to spread random changes all over the tree, often totally uneeded whitespace changes and reformatted ocmments and stuff like that May 14 13:45:25 *how well May 14 13:45:35 nope, their are integrating into linux mainstream May 14 13:45:50 I have seen in recent vanilla linux some of their code May 14 13:46:05 okay May 14 13:46:33 btw, git diff outputs non valid output for patches/ May 14 13:46:49 any idea on how to achieve the intended result? May 14 13:47:08 what you mean with non-valid? May 14 13:47:28 it fails (it happened to me once) May 14 13:47:29 usually gnu patch can apply git diff output just fine - unless it contains special git features, like encoded binary files May 14 13:47:49 oh ok May 14 13:48:04 then I will have to review one thing May 14 13:48:09 thanks! May 14 13:48:14 welcome May 14 13:49:06 jow_laptop: do you know how broken packages are detected? like, why packges that aren't marked as broken, and have no deps (that I can see) on broken packages are getting marked as broken by make menuconfig? they build perfectly well when I enable showing broken packages. May 14 13:49:38 broken is an explicit mark (DEPENDS:=@BROKEN) there is nothing automatic about it May 14 13:50:05 if you notice stuff seemingly getting marked broken by itself then it can only be due to indirect depends on @BROKEN stuff May 14 13:53:24 ok, so just have to look down the chain of everydepo of every dep of mine to find one othem marked explicitly then :| ok :) May 14 13:55:22 so, elfutils is broken, and libelf1 uses elfutils defaults May 14 13:56:05 and not marked broken in trunk, only in AA. ok. that helps explain this. May 14 13:59:47 zajec: they look good May 14 14:00:04 I started something similar one or two years ago but never finished May 14 14:00:20 is there any list of FEATURES I can put to a target? May 14 14:00:45 Hauke: thanks! i'll improve it a bit May 14 14:00:48 zajec: are you adding the devices using tg3 into the bmips3300 section? May 14 14:00:48 add descriptions May 14 14:01:11 i think so May 14 14:01:40 PACKAGES:=kmod-b44 kmod-tg3 kmod-b43 kmod-b43legacy May 14 14:02:04 when they are getting an own kernel we can activate some gcc optimizations for mips74k cpu May 14 14:02:22 that's my point May 14 14:02:28 i'm going to add another subtarget May 14 14:02:32 called "mips74k" May 14 14:02:40 with tg3 & b44 dropped May 14 14:02:52 and b43legacy dropped (44168 B !!!) May 14 14:03:06 and B43_PHY_LP dropped May 14 14:03:08 etc. May 14 14:03:26 and I wanted to keep "generic" a generic one May 14 14:03:30 with everything enabled May 14 14:03:50 we can kill it at some point if we decide to May 14 14:03:53 ah ok, so generic is the same we build now May 14 14:03:59 yes May 14 14:04:24 also I didn't move any device-specific images to use bmpis3300 subtarget yet May 14 14:04:31 so far bmips3300 generates .trx only May 14 14:04:36 have you seen this: a ssb based device with pcie: https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/15841 May 14 14:05:01 the WRT610Nv2/E3000: log May 14 14:06:39 is that so weird? May 14 14:06:52 most of my cards are mini PCIe based May 14 14:07:12 Hauke: http://zajec.net/hardware May 14 14:07:34 14e4:4312, 14e4:4315, 14e4:4328, 14e4:432b May 14 14:07:39 all are PCIe and ssb based May 14 14:07:49 ah ok I did not know May 14 14:13:59 zajec: thanks for the gpio docs :) May 14 14:14:47 now just need to follow up on how to use uevents :) May 14 14:23:36 karlp: http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/howto/hardware.button May 14 14:29:13 yeah, that doc is hardly complete. it has lots of holes in it and devices that behave differently :) May 14 14:31:11 I have updated my remote https://github.com/txomon/openwrt/tree/integration/xilinx-zynq May 14 14:31:31 now, I need to find a configuration for xilinx kernel May 14 14:31:47 any tip/recommendation on how to proceed? May 14 14:32:42 karlp: there are too less ppl to write doc :( May 14 14:36:10 I know, well aware of that, May 14 14:36:14 hate this ¬¬ May 14 14:36:29 (irc connection from ultrafirewalled university) May 14 14:36:50 that's why I was thanking your for updating the docs you did update, it's a nice helpfulclarification of all the differnt gpiobuttonshotplugkeysmodevent soup May 14 14:37:14 :) May 14 14:37:30 glad someone sees it :) May 14 14:37:42 jow_laptop: any progress on pushing your LuCI2 work? May 14 14:37:56 I've still got two boards wher eone has buttons and one doesn't, but it's not important for me yet, the other board has other issues too :) May 14 14:38:27 did you receive my link? May 14 14:54:46 arggghhhhh I had forgot that the .tar.xz and the linux main tree tags are not the same TT May 14 15:05:41 I can't understand this... why is it failing? May 14 15:05:57 I mean I made the diff between stable/v3.13 and xilinx/master May 14 15:26:06 I am stuck with this kernel thing... May 14 15:26:19 will come back later (if possible) May 14 15:50:40 jow r40768 trunk/package/Makefile * package: ignore failed downloads with IGNORE_ERRORS May 14 16:02:56 Hi, since days mpc83xx is not been build. The error message displayed in http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/mpc83xx/builds/56/steps/compile_8/logs/stdio (dtbImage.rb600.elf: No such file or directory) can be solved as described in https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?pid=222145#p222145. Is there anyone that could fix it, or explain why this workaround is needed? I've applied the workaround and I can compile mpc83xx without err May 14 16:02:56 ors... May 14 16:25:37 nbd: alive? May 14 17:05:27 how does a status being enabled/disabled work? I've put /etc/init.d/blah disable in uci-defaults, May 14 17:06:09 and /etc/init.d/blah enabled returns the expected value, but /etc/init.d/blah start still starts it May 14 17:06:16 oh, /etc/rc.d doesn't have the link fo rit. May 14 17:06:23 ok. so that's fine then. May 14 17:40:54 <5EXAA8SU8> build #564 of rb532 is complete: Failure [failed shell_10] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/rb532/builds/564 May 14 17:40:56 <5EXAA8SU8> build #564 of ppc44x is complete: Failure [failed shell_10] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ppc44x/builds/564 May 14 17:56:50 <5EXAA8SU8> build #58 of adm8668 is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/adm8668/builds/58 May 14 17:59:39 <5EXAA8SU8> build #533 of sibyte is complete: Failure [failed shell_10] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/sibyte/builds/533 May 14 18:11:50 <5EXAA8SU8> build #170 of imx6 is complete: Failure [failed compile_3] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/imx6/builds/170 May 14 18:34:11 <5EXAA8SU8> build #59 of mpc83xx is complete: Failure [failed compile_8] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/mpc83xx/builds/59 May 14 20:12:21 still struggling against how to convert a mainline kernel into a stable one... May 14 20:17:15 Hey guys, quick question rc.local is not executing any commands I put in there, I noticed it wasn't executable, so I chmod +x rc.local to make it executable, but it still wont execute my commands, any ideas? (tp link mr3040 v2.3, barrier breaker r40749) May 14 20:17:33 is this a known problem? May 14 20:24:13 can someone guide how the ht_capab lines in the config should look like in light of this patch ? https://dev.openwrt.org/changeset/40682/trunk May 14 20:25:09 i've tried using for example option tx_stbc '1', but it has no effect. and for 2.4 n networks no ht_capab lines are ever created May 14 20:29:34 Hey guys, quick question rc.local is not executing any commands I put in there, I noticed it wasn't executable, so I chmod +x rc.local to make it executable, but it still wont execute my commands, any ideas? (tp link mr3040 v2.3, barrier breaker r40749) May 14 20:52:47 hello world May 14 20:57:16 <5EXAA8SU8> build #543 of avr32 is complete: Failure [failed shell compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/avr32/builds/543 May 14 21:00:07 <5EXAA8SU8> build #471 of iop32x is complete: Failure [failed shell_10] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/iop32x/builds/471 May 14 21:00:33 <5EXAA8SU8> build #59 of x86_64 is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/x86_64/builds/59 May 14 21:17:11 yay! spam. May 14 21:50:45 luka r40769 trunk/ include/kernel-version.mk target/linux/x86_64/Makefile target/linux/generic/patches-3.14/902-debloat_proc.patch * kernel: update 3.14 to 3.14.4 May 15 02:48:49 <5EXAA8SU8> build #610 of orion is complete: Failure [failed compile_8] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/orion/builds/610 **** ENDING LOGGING AT Thu May 15 02:59:59 2014