**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Fri May 16 02:59:58 2014 May 16 03:02:27 <5EXAA8SU8> build #171 of imx6 is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/imx6/builds/171 May 16 04:15:36 <5EXAA8SU8> build #458 of gemini is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/gemini/builds/458 May 16 05:02:42 <5EXAA8SU8> build #575 of uml is complete: Failure [failed compile_8] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/uml/builds/575 May 16 05:18:23 <5EXAA8SU8> build #275 of mpc85xx is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/mpc85xx/builds/275 May 16 07:05:07 <5EXAA8SU8> build #62 of cns21xx is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/cns21xx/builds/62 May 16 07:13:35 karlp, there doesn't exist anything, I have all the stuff documented. Xilinx Zynq has a First Stage Bootloader (FSBL) that calls the uboot instance, and this, calls the kernel May 16 07:13:51 there is nothing in the internal memory but the FSBL May 16 07:22:47 txomon|fon: did you test code like https://github.com/fakedrake/xilinx-zynq-bootstrap ? before creating uboot yourself you should first try to get a "default known to work" May 16 07:28:02 <5EXAA8SU8> build #605 of cobalt is complete: Failure [failed shell] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/cobalt/builds/605 May 16 07:45:32 <5EXAA8SU8> build #500 of au1000 is complete: Failure [failed shell] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/au1000/builds/500 May 16 08:24:02 plntyk, I just wanted to pack the xilinx one May 16 11:45:53 <5EXAA8SU8> build #460 of mcs814x is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/mcs814x/builds/460 May 16 11:50:00 hi all! May 16 11:50:09 nbd i am trying the modified netifd May 16 11:50:27 on openwrt x86 image it works like a charm May 16 11:50:52 while on an ubiquity bullet that is ar7xxx it add 802.1q interface May 16 11:51:08 also iproute2 has the same beavior May 16 11:52:00 ubnt bullet have this kernel 3.10.36 so 802.1ad should be supported May 16 11:52:35 moreover the modified neifd core have a warning if 802.1ad is not supported and user try to configure it May 16 11:52:40 and warning is not printed May 16 11:52:47 so in header all simbols are ok... May 16 11:57:39 nbd x86 image and ar7xxx have same identical kernel version 3.10.36 May 16 11:57:44 but different beavious... May 16 12:26:50 g10h4ck: ar71xx is big endian May 16 12:27:20 so there is a bug also in iproute2 ? May 16 12:27:25 or is it in the kernel ? May 16 12:28:03 g10h4ck: g10h4ck good question, where your issues are coming from. but that's the biggest difference other then being different platform May 16 12:28:16 g10h4ck: if you can, you should try it on a third one, preferable little endian mips May 16 12:29:37 the strange thing is that some month ago i tried the same thing (just with iproute i didn't had modified netifd yet at that time) on a a ar71xx machine and it was working... May 16 12:29:52 i still have that machine here so i can give it a try ina moment May 16 12:34:20 Kaloz seems it is not working on that machine too... May 16 12:36:27 Kaloz i was wrong May 16 12:36:40 it is working on tplink wdr-3600 May 16 12:36:57 so it is something hardware specific May 16 12:37:13 let's do some more test on this tplink... May 16 12:37:25 kernel version is the same also here May 16 12:46:24 Kaloz on tl-wdr3600 i obtain a more strange beavior... May 16 12:46:42 this device have switch May 16 12:47:41 that is configured eth0.1 is untagged on the port but tagged on the cpu eth0.2 is tagged on the port and tagged on the cpu May 16 12:48:33 if i configure an 802.1ad interface on top of eth0.1 like eth0.1.1000 with wireshark i see packets going out as 802.1q with tag 1000 May 16 12:48:48 qhile i would expect them coming out with 802.1ad tag 1000 May 16 12:49:14 on the other hand if i configure eth0.2.1000 May 16 12:49:59 i see the packets going out with 802.1q header with id 2 and then the 802.1ad header with id 1000 as expected May 16 12:50:18 seems the ethernet header is mangled somewere... May 16 13:05:09 wdr3600 has 8327N switch maybe some hw register is not set right ? May 16 13:08:55 there are some open tickets on that switch too May 16 14:11:19 <5EXAA8SU8> build #61 of mpc83xx is complete: Failure [failed shell compile_8] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/mpc83xx/builds/61 May 16 15:43:03 GCC error detection code is different between platforms ? May 16 15:49:47 lxc fails only on powerpc arch with " 'ret' may be used uninitialized " strange May 16 15:56:45 different optimization patterns most likely May 16 17:11:44 jow_laptop nbd something very strange is happening!!!! May 16 17:12:00 tcpdump on eth0 see the packets going out as 802.1ad May 16 17:12:13 while the arrive on my computer as 802.1q !!! May 16 17:12:34 between the bullet and my computer there is just a plain switch May 16 17:12:44 l'et's see what happen connecting directly May 16 17:16:33 i can confirm it is happening also connecting directly the device with my computer May 16 17:22:28 <_trine> feeds.conf.default in trunk is not correct for 'src-git telephony http://git.openwrt.org/feed/telephony.git' May 16 17:22:37 <_trine> can someone correct it please May 16 17:26:14 <_trine> http://pastebin.com/GfCjggUt May 16 17:27:06 g10h4ck: you're testing on a device with builtin switch? May 16 17:27:29 no i am testing on an ubiquity bullet May 16 17:27:49 k May 16 17:27:52 moreover this was working some month ago also on devices with builtin switch like tl-3600 and tl-3500 May 16 17:28:03 i am writing more details on a pad May 16 17:30:53 jow_laptop nbd her goes more details http://bpaste.net/show/YBjAkdbQ6RS5U3wRS1qd/ May 16 17:32:49 seems something inside the kernel/driver is trasforming 802.1ad packets into 802.1q :( May 16 17:40:09 <5EXAA8SU8> build #535 of sibyte is complete: Failure [failed shell_10] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/sibyte/builds/535 May 16 17:40:09 <5EXAA8SU8> build #566 of ppc44x is complete: Failure [failed shell_10] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ppc44x/builds/566 May 16 17:40:45 <5EXAA8SU8> build #566 of rb532 is complete: Failure [failed shell_10] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/rb532/builds/566 May 16 18:26:19 jow_laptop nbd i am happy you are enjoyng battlemesh but please help me too, i am missing a lot staying there :( May 16 18:30:50 excuse me, why the V2 or V3 of the patches i've sent are not shown in the patchwork? May 16 18:31:21 i mean: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] [lantiq] [1/2] [V3] EEPROM fix for Astoria/Arcadyan boards. May 16 18:33:21 in addition, V1 seems mangled ??? May 16 18:36:04 ah i was wondering why there were less commits recently - battlemesh certainly explains it May 16 18:43:04 what is battlemesh? May 16 18:44:49 http://battlemesh.org/BattleMeshV7 hacking and testing of wireless mesh networks and their algorithms May 16 18:57:12 thanks, yes, makes sense May 16 19:19:59 <5EXAA8SU8> build #61 of x86_64 is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/x86_64/builds/61 May 16 19:37:54 nbd r40773 trunk/package/base-files/files/lib/functions/uci-defaults.sh * base-files: enable force_link for lan by default May 16 19:52:14 <5EXAA8SU8> build #60 of adm8668 is complete: Failure [failed shell_15] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/adm8668/builds/60 May 16 19:59:17 <5EXAA8SU8> build #473 of iop32x is complete: Failure [failed shell_10] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/iop32x/builds/473 May 16 20:37:20 <5EXAA8SU8> build #546 of avr32 is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/avr32/builds/546 May 16 21:05:38 <_trine> crapola lives May 16 21:05:41 <_trine> http://pastebin.com/tBe4wLK7 May 16 22:17:59 _trine: how's feeds.conf.default wrong? Mazilo is the freeswitch maintainer May 17 02:58:04 <5EXAA8SU8> build #576 of uml is complete: Failure [failed compile_8] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/uml/builds/576 **** ENDING LOGGING AT Sat May 17 02:59:59 2014