**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Mon May 19 02:59:58 2014
May 19 04:53:21 <5EXAA8SU8> build #578 of uml is complete: Failure [failed compile_8]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/uml/builds/578
May 19 05:06:59 <5EXAA8SU8> build #536 of xburst is complete: Success [build successful]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/xburst/builds/536
May 19 07:16:36 <5EXAA8SU8> build #623 of brcm47xx is complete: Success [build successful]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/brcm47xx/builds/623
May 19 08:47:31 <5EXAA8SU8> build #503 of au1000 is complete: Failure [failed compile_8]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/au1000/builds/503
May 19 08:57:43 <5EXAA8SU8> build #474 of ep93xx is complete: Success [build successful]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ep93xx/builds/474
May 19 10:20:40 <g10h4ck> hi all!
May 19 10:20:53 <g10h4ck> nbd jow_laptop is there any plan to make netowrk configuration coerent ?
May 19 10:21:08 <g10h4ck> at moment we hav efro example interface type=bridge
May 19 10:21:16 <g10h4ck> that actually create a bridge
May 19 10:21:29 <g10h4ck> i have tryete to do it with a device section but it didn't worked
May 19 11:43:37 <Mazilo> It has been more than a week and I still can't access to OpenWRT SVN and/or Forum. Does this mean the OpenWRT server (78.24.191.177) has blocked my public IP Address?
May 19 11:46:20 <g10h4ck> strange
May 19 11:46:38 <g10h4ck> jow_laptop and nbd seems still unreacheable...
May 19 11:47:22 <g10h4ck> probably they are sleeping after battlemesh fest
May 19 11:59:23 <plntyk> Mazilo: which server did you request ?
May 19 12:00:26 <Mazilo> SVN server and Forum server are on the same IP Address (78.24.191.177) that I can't access.
May 19 12:01:35 <DonkeyHotei> i can't help but notice you're connected here via ipv6
May 19 12:02:09 <Mazilo> DonkeyHotei: My cablemodem is assigned with both a public IPv4 and IPv6.
May 19 12:03:11 <plntyk> maybe "Carrier NAT" for IPv4 is not working correctly ?
May 19 12:03:36 <Mazilo> plntyk: Honestly, I have no idea. :(
May 19 12:03:45 <stintel> did you try a traceroute -I ?
May 19 12:04:00 <DonkeyHotei> it would be nice if the server in question were reachable via ipv6
May 19 12:07:37 <Mazilo> DonkeyHotei: Definitely.
May 19 14:14:36 <jow_laptop> Noltari: ping
May 19 14:32:05 <g10h4ck> ping jow_laptop
May 19 14:32:54 <g10h4ck> is there any intention toward coerence into networking configuration ?
May 19 14:49:44 <jow_laptop> g10h4ck: I don't understand the question
May 19 15:06:21 <g10h4ck> jow_laptop there are some incoerence
May 19 15:06:30 <g10h4ck> for example to create bridge
May 19 15:06:38 <g10h4ck> one would expect to use a device section
May 19 15:07:00 <g10h4ck> while at moment you have to use an interface to create a bridge
May 19 15:07:15 <g10h4ck> and i have tempted it witha  device section and it didn't worked
May 19 15:07:46 <cyrusff> well creating the brdige is a side-effect there
May 19 15:07:56 <cyrusff> foremost you setup a network protocol
May 19 15:12:34 <cyrusff> though yeah if you have a look at macvlan then its inconsistent
May 19 15:13:04 <cyrusff> i guess macvlan should have been configurable like bridges though
May 19 15:15:51 <jow_laptop> its probably a bug
May 19 15:16:24 <jow_laptop> as far as I understood the design notes, the current way to add bridges is merely a backwards compat thing and it *should* be possible to explicitely declare bridges using config device
May 19 15:19:31 <g10h4ck> so it is a bug
May 19 15:19:47 <g10h4ck> and the direction is to do things in a coerent way
May 19 15:19:56 <g10h4ck> i am happy to be reassured about thet :)
May 19 15:20:06 <g10h4ck> i am doing all this questions
May 19 15:20:18 <g10h4ck> because i am developing and reading reifd code
May 19 15:20:24 <g10h4ck> *netifd
May 19 15:20:48 <g10h4ck> i would be sure the direction everyone wants is coerent with mine before dedicating much effort ;)
May 19 15:24:27 <g10h4ck> jow_laptop how to create an openwrt image with netifd with debug enabled ?
May 19 15:24:57 <g10h4ck> i wanna debug the bridge thing
May 19 15:25:15 <jow_laptop> debugging should be in by default
May 19 15:25:39 <g10h4ck> i don't get in logread messages produced by D macro in neifd
May 19 15:25:52 <g10h4ck> i get only messages that have level notice or higer
May 19 15:26:53 <jow_laptop> you need to start netifd with "-d 0xff"
May 19 15:28:01 <g10h4ck> where i should put this so netifd get started with that option ?
May 19 15:28:47 <jow_laptop>  /etc/init.d/network
May 19 15:37:23 <g10h4ck> thanks jow_laptop :D
May 19 15:37:49 <g10h4ck> it is incredible everytime i touch something some bug pop up
May 19 15:38:26 <g10h4ck> saverio is right that developers should scratch their balls...
May 19 15:38:55 <g10h4ck> when they notice me using their software :P
May 19 15:49:46 <OpenWrt-Commits> jow r40777 trunk/target/linux/generic/files/drivers/net/phy/ar8216.c * ar71xx: Fix tagged+untagged operation on AR8327N (#12181)
May 19 15:50:24 <g10h4ck> yeeeeeeeeeeeeee!!! tagged/untagged fixed!!
May 19 16:42:16 <5EXAA8SU8> build #62 of pxa is complete: Success [build successful]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/pxa/builds/62
May 19 16:42:46 <OpenWrt-Commits> luka r40778 trunk/package/boot/uboot-envtools/ Makefile patches/001-compile.patch patches/001-honor_opt_flags.patch * [package] uboot-envtools: update to 2014.04
May 19 17:39:33 <5EXAA8SU8> build #569 of rb532 is complete: Failure [failed shell_10]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/rb532/builds/569
May 19 17:41:46 <5EXAA8SU8> build #569 of ppc44x is complete: Failure [failed shell_10]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ppc44x/builds/569
May 19 18:06:02 <5EXAA8SU8> build #538 of sibyte is complete: Failure [failed shell_10]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/sibyte/builds/538
May 19 18:18:46 <5EXAA8SU8> build #64 of mpc83xx is complete: Failure [failed compile_8]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/mpc83xx/builds/64
May 19 18:57:17 <OpenWrt-Commits> luka r40779 trunk/package/boot/uboot-lantiq/Makefile * [package] uboot-lantiq: remove duplicate define
May 19 19:52:36 <5EXAA8SU8> build #476 of iop32x is complete: Failure [failed shell_10 shell_15]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/iop32x/builds/476
May 19 19:53:07 <OpenWrt-Commits> nbd r40780 trunk/package/kernel/mac80211/patches/ (5 files) * ath9k: add some rx path fixes
May 19 21:04:19 <5EXAA8SU8> build #549 of avr32 is complete: Failure [failed compile_5]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/avr32/builds/549
May 19 22:00:07 <OpenWrt-Commits> nbd r40781 trunk/package/system/fstools/Makefile * fstools: update to the latest version, adds ubifs support and ubi/mtd fixes
May 19 22:00:10 <OpenWrt-Commits> nbd r40782 trunk/package/network/ services/hostapd/Makefile services/hostapd/patches/200-multicall.patch * hostapd: add a package for eapol_test
May 19 22:20:29 <OpenWrt-Commits> nbd r40783 trunk/package/kernel/mac80211/files/lib/netifd/wireless/mac80211.sh * mac80211: fix stbc configuration
May 19 22:52:07 <qeef> hi there! can anyone check this ticket once more yet? https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/16526
May 20 01:44:20 <5EXAA8SU8> build #579 of uml is complete: Failure [failed compile_8]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/uml/builds/579
**** ENDING LOGGING AT Tue May 20 02:59:58 2014