**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Sat May 24 02:59:58 2014 May 24 03:25:19 <5EXAA8SU8> build #67 of pxa is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/pxa/builds/67 May 24 04:12:03 <5EXAA8SU8> build #467 of gemini is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/gemini/builds/467 May 24 06:42:44 <5EXAA8SU8> build #69 of x86_64 is complete: Failure [failed compile_1] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/x86_64/builds/69 May 24 07:32:22 <5EXAA8SU8> build #68 of adm8668 is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/adm8668/builds/68 May 24 07:50:53 still missing qemu-img on buildbot for x86_64 May 24 08:03:04 nbd r40840 trunk/target/linux/ar71xx/files/arch/mips/ath79/mach-tl-wr703n.c * ar71xx: fix typo in tl-wr710n mac setup (fixes #16469) May 24 08:03:08 nbd r40841 trunk/target/linux/ar71xx/patches-3.10/525-MIPS-ath79-enable-qca-usb-quirks.patch * ar71xx: enable usb quirks for all chipidea based devices May 24 09:19:49 <_trine> anyone know why I am seeing this when I start my dockstar with todays trunk May 24 09:19:55 <_trine> root@OpenWrt:/# procd: Instance uhttpd::instance4 s in a crash loop 6 crashes, 0 seconds since last crash May 24 09:19:55 <_trine> procd: Instance uhttpd::instance3 s in a crash loop 6 crashes, 0 seconds since l ast crash May 24 09:20:51 <_trine> this is looking with a serial connection May 24 11:52:04 <5EXAA8SU8> build #69 of mpc83xx is complete: Failure [failed compile_8] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/mpc83xx/builds/69 May 24 12:12:53 luka: i created this little write-up http://wiki.openwrt.org/toh/cloudengines/pogoplug May 24 13:30:40 <5EXAA8SU8> build #70 of bcm53xx is complete: Failure [failed shell] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/bcm53xx/builds/70 May 24 14:47:48 heffer: nice May 24 14:50:54 heffer: have you tried savenv in u-boot using that environment offset May 24 14:51:12 cuz i bricked my plug's u-boot doing that May 24 14:51:17 it overwrote u-boot with the env... May 24 14:51:20 yes i did May 24 14:51:36 i see you're doing 2 stage though May 24 14:51:36 it works, but only when it has been erased before May 24 14:51:48 stage2 doesn't have the saveenv command May 24 14:51:55 hmm May 24 14:52:03 also doesn't need May 24 14:52:08 i wasn't using the openwrt u-boot though, i was using vanilla upstream May 24 14:52:37 yeah the upstream vanilla one uses 0x60000 as offset May 24 14:52:48 heh May 24 14:52:50 that's right in the uboot memory section May 24 14:52:56 i had to jtag May 24 14:54:25 i kind of independently created a dts and ported openwrt to the plug May 24 14:54:58 didn't submit any patches though May 24 14:55:16 even the factory u-boot goes up to 0x606c4 so either way, the upstream u-boot offset of 0x60000 is bogus May 24 14:55:40 even worse: it's unsafe as it will definitely brick your device May 24 14:55:46 yes May 24 14:56:18 on mine i removed the led and am using the gpio as inputs May 24 14:56:25 for gps pps May 24 14:57:08 pps frequency 29.551 ppm, stability 0.009 ppm, jitter 2.000 us, May 24 14:57:23 works well, i am doing an RT kernel though May 24 14:57:39 nice May 24 14:57:44 yea... May 24 14:57:54 it has been sitting here on my desk for like 75 days :D May 24 14:57:58 according to uptime May 24 14:58:12 i'm waiting on a new GPS module then i will install it permanently May 24 15:02:47 nice work though, i will probably switch to your version of trunk when i get i finalize the build May 24 15:10:29 m4t: glad you like it :) May 24 16:59:17 hmm. dnsmasq option changes? my option notinterface 'eth1' isn't apparently respected May 24 17:00:08 as a result, it's answering dns queries on the wan interface and was participating inadvertently in a dns amplification attack May 24 17:01:03 r40010 on ar71xx May 24 17:01:49 # opkg list_installed | grep dnsmasq May 24 17:01:50 dnsmasq - 2.66-5 May 24 17:02:28 russell--: notinterface must be a list May 24 17:02:35 list notinterface 'eth1' May 24 17:03:08 ah May 24 17:03:55 <_trine> is this a problem to concern anyone which I see when I boot my dockstar with todays trunk May 24 17:03:57 <_trine> root@OpenWrt:/# [ 50.856589] [sched_delayed] sched: RT throttling activated May 24 17:03:57 <_trine> procd: Instance uhttpd::instance3 s in a crash loop 6 crashes, 0 seconds since last crash May 24 17:03:57 <_trine> procd: Instance uhttpd::instance4 s in a crash loop 6 crashes, 0 seconds since last crash May 24 17:03:58 did that change at some point? May 24 17:05:48 jow r40842 trunk/target/linux/generic/files/drivers/net/phy/ar8216.c * Revert "ar71xx: Fix tagged+untagged operation on AR8327N (#12181)" May 24 17:08:53 russell--: now, its this way for 5 years now May 24 17:08:56 *no May 24 17:09:18 the parm is processed by config_list_foreach which only works for list entries, not options May 24 17:09:37 okay May 24 17:12:26 it looks like a bug when i converted to using uci-defaults (from $TOPDIR/files overlay) for node configuration May 24 17:15:23 just substitute "uci set dnsmasq.@dnsmasq[0].notinterface=eth1" with "uci add_list dnsmasq.@dnsmasq[0].notinterface=eth1" May 24 17:15:34 right May 24 17:15:35 assuming you do it that way May 24 17:15:42 just found that May 24 17:16:25 i apparently got confused during the translation, because i was working from uci show dhcp and the two aren't visibly distinguishable afaict May 24 17:18:00 dhcp.@dnsmasq[0].rebind_protection=0 May 24 17:18:00 dhcp.@dnsmasq[0].notinterface=eth1 May 24 17:33:25 hello, I have a QCA9558+AR9580 board here that doesn't store correct MAC addresses in its ART partition (the factory OS grabs them from u-boot) May 24 17:34:20 cyrozap: i have a patch for that, awaiting review May 24 17:34:45 adri: what's the holdup? May 24 17:36:41 DonkeyHotei: Oh, cool! May 24 17:39:55 <5EXAA8SU8> build #574 of ppc44x is complete: Failure [failed shell_10] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ppc44x/builds/574 May 24 17:40:00 <5EXAA8SU8> build #543 of sibyte is complete: Failure [failed shell_10] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/sibyte/builds/543 May 24 17:41:31 <5EXAA8SU8> build #574 of rb532 is complete: Failure [failed shell_10] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/rb532/builds/574 May 24 17:41:42 <5EXAA8SU8> build #481 of iop32x is complete: Failure [failed shell_10] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/iop32x/builds/481 May 24 18:32:34 <_trine> can someone port libedit-dev because I am getting this error in my compile ??? configure: error: You need to either install libedit-dev (>= 2.11) or configure with --disable-core-libedit-support May 24 19:00:09 <5EXAA8SU8> build #614 of cobalt is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/cobalt/builds/614 May 24 19:00:28 <5EXAA8SU8> build #509 of au1000 is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/au1000/builds/509 May 24 19:02:44 <5EXAA8SU8> build #620 of orion is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/orion/builds/620 May 24 19:08:56 <5EXAA8SU8> build #584 of uml is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/uml/builds/584 May 24 19:24:08 _trine: what are you compiling that gives you that error? May 24 19:24:34 <_trine> part of Freeswitch May 24 19:25:10 have you considered adding the --disable thing it suggests? May 24 19:25:57 <_trine> option to "Compile with libedit Support" under the FS configuration page. May 24 19:26:04 <_trine> I want it enabled May 24 19:26:14 <_trine> because it gives more features May 24 19:26:37 <_trine> Older versions of FS depended on libcurses and new version now depends on libedit May 24 19:27:06 <_trine> so we need libedit May 24 19:27:23 i grabbed a wrt54gs v2 with a sticker on it saying "bricked" and got a jtag header onto it, but urjtag reports "TDO seems to be stuck at 1" after the LEDs come on and settle to a blinking power. anyone ever seen similar? May 24 19:27:43 DonkeyHotei: i think i put that sticker on it ;-) May 24 19:27:54 russell--: yes, you did May 24 19:28:04 <_trine> DonkeyHotei, I used the pin shorting method on it :P May 24 19:28:13 russell--: but idk the backstory May 24 19:28:16 it might just be hosed May 24 19:28:29 like some kind of component failure May 24 19:28:39 * russell-- has no idea, which is how it landed in that box May 24 19:29:00 "bricked" implies it worked, then something was done that bricked it May 24 19:29:38 i think what i had in mind is that i'd tried all the easy things to recover and they hadn't worked May 24 19:30:05 it had no jtag header, so that wasn't tried May 24 19:30:26 but honestly, it would have been so long ago, i don't recall what the observables might have been May 24 19:31:05 one possibility is that something is badly crashing the cpu, and urjtag isn't resetting it fully May 24 19:31:23 that's why i ask if anyone has seen that happen May 24 19:31:25 <_trine> DonkeyHotei, will your jtag allow you to clear it all May 24 19:32:10 not if it can't connect May 24 19:32:51 <_trine> I have only ever used the simple parallel jtag cables on those routers ,, it never failed May 24 19:33:20 * russell-- suggests tossing it into a far-away bin and forgetting it ever existed May 24 19:33:34 but it's 8/32 May 24 19:33:40 (which is what i did) May 24 19:33:42 lol May 24 19:33:56 but now you are ruining it! ;-) May 24 19:34:08 if debricking is possible, might be worth a shot May 24 20:23:12 <5EXAA8SU8> build #469 of mcs814x is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/mcs814x/builds/469 May 24 20:34:04 Quick question: How should I know what to set for my router in the /etc/uci-defaults/02_network script? May 24 20:34:19 Does it matter what the lan and wan interfaces are called? May 24 20:34:37 And how should I know which ports whould be on what vlan? May 24 20:35:20 I know port 0 is the CPU, 1-4 are LAN, 5 is WAN and 6 is 5 GHz WLAN May 24 20:38:09 <5EXAA8SU8> build #554 of avr32 is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/avr32/builds/554 May 24 22:05:10 DonkeyHotei: shit at work just took over all of my brain cycles, I'm sorry May 24 22:06:00 adri: any idea how many more cycles it will monopolize? May 24 22:12:58 It's kinda infinite at this point, but I'll go rvisit this with nbd tomorrow May 24 22:13:03 where's the patch again May 24 22:13:16 I'm sorry I drpoped the ball on this. :( May 24 22:17:24 [Sat 2014-05-24 03:13:03 PM PDT] where's the patch again <----- somewhere in your inbox May 24 22:17:48 ah right May 24 22:17:49 lemme go find it May 24 22:21:23 gah, what's your email address again? May 24 22:29:27 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xO9ppicjlFg May 24 22:33:54 DonkeyHotei: hm, linville didn't pick it up May 24 22:33:55 ? May 24 22:34:08 adri: so you submitted it? May 24 22:35:52 lemme just do a pull on linux-next May 24 22:35:54 and find out May 24 22:36:12 DonkeyHotei: actually, I'll wait for linville to show up on irc and I'll ask him May 24 22:36:27 thanx May 24 22:36:56 np May 24 22:36:59 don't be afraid to poke me again about it May 24 22:37:05 if it's a problem, I'll tell you to stop. :P May 24 22:38:19 still no one found to convert ar23xx to device tree, alas May 24 22:39:04 heh May 24 22:39:41 it's a prerequisite for upstreaming your sparky findings May 24 23:05:42 adri: hey May 24 23:06:59 fyi, i took a look at ath9k to check if the rx buffer handling was correct for non-edma hardware May 24 23:07:08 turns out the buffer holding logic was already implemented May 24 23:08:03 turns out i stumbled upon that issue some time last year already and fixed it ;) May 24 23:10:39 oh cool May 24 23:10:53 i'm still seeing owl scribble all over things sometimes in powersave mode May 24 23:11:03 it's like the rx fifo loses its shit and writes some garbage value over and over again in the rx descriptor space May 24 23:11:38 i need to get a more updated laptop with an internal ar9380-or-later to make it my day to day laptop, as having those extenders hang out the side sucks May 24 23:11:53 have you seen that kind of rx behaviour on other chips? May 24 23:12:09 it happens in some noisy scenarios when i'm using owl in powersave mode; it doesn't happen in non-powersave mode May 24 23:12:19 (and how's you?) May 24 23:22:49 haven't found the time to play with powersave yet May 24 23:23:11 since with ath9k i'm not very interested in things that aren't relevant to router stuff May 25 00:37:21 nbd: *nod* May 25 00:37:34 nbd: I think I'm going ot have to schedule some time at the QCA office soon **** ENDING LOGGING AT Sun May 25 02:59:58 2014