**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Tue Jul 15 02:59:59 2014 Jul 15 04:43:49 build #214 of mvebu is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/mvebu/builds/214 Jul 15 05:40:05 build #121 of adm8668 is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/adm8668/builds/121 Jul 15 06:12:13 build #520 of mcs814x is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/mcs814x/builds/520 Jul 15 09:16:01 build #625 of rb532 is complete: Failure [failed shell] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/rb532/builds/625 Jul 15 09:31:35 cyrus r41664 packages/libs/protobuf-c * protobuf: moved to github Jul 15 10:09:09 build #577 of kirkwood is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/kirkwood/builds/577 Jul 15 10:32:19 nbd r41665 trunk/package/network/services/hostapd/files/netifd.sh Jul 15 10:32:19 hostapd: add a require_mode option in wifi-device sections to select the minimum hardware mode that the AP requires from clients Jul 15 11:13:19 build #574 of ar71xx is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ar71xx/builds/574 Jul 15 11:14:05 build #26 of brcm47xx.mips74k is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/brcm47xx.mips74k/builds/26 Jul 15 13:25:03 build #121 of mpc83xx is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/mpc83xx/builds/121 Jul 15 13:59:54 who is maintaining the xorg feed? Jul 15 14:00:47 i found some missing dependencies and patched some things in mesa - where to contribute patches? Jul 15 14:01:30 n3ph: no-one, its completely defunct afair Jul 15 14:01:50 ack Jul 15 14:02:37 but it's a svn so far.. so is it possible to check in there? Jul 15 14:04:25 possible yes but it will not happen most likely Jul 15 14:05:01 we're in the process of getting rid of unmaintained packages, submissions for unmaintained ones are not accepted anymore Jul 15 14:05:15 imho the best would be to move the entire xorg feed to github and remove it from owrt.org Jul 15 14:12:26 hey, I need grama help of someone english-speaking :) Jul 15 14:13:11 should I use plural forms twice in a sentence? Jul 15 14:13:27 is sth like "boards revisions 3 and 4" correct? Jul 15 14:14:37 no, just "board revisions" Jul 15 14:15:15 thanks :) Jul 15 14:29:47 build #335 of mpc85xx is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/mpc85xx/builds/335 Jul 15 14:47:07 What binary architecture files are supposed to be in the staging_dir//usr/bin' directory? Jul 15 14:50:46 IIRC, it used to contain the host binary architecture files that can be executed from the host. For instance, I used to be able to execute "staging_dir/target-arm_xscale_uClibc-0.9.33.2_eabi/usr/bin/perl -MConfig -e 'print $Config{archlib}'" to get the result. Now, the "staging_dir/target-arm_xscale_uClibc-0.9.33.2_eabi/usr/bin/perl" is an ELF 32-bit LSB executable ARM format. Jul 15 14:52:35 staging_dir/target-*/bin/ is supposed to contain cross compiled files Jul 15 14:52:45 staging_dir/host/bin/ is for hsot executable ones Jul 15 14:54:00 jow_laptop: yes, but this (http://paste.debian.net/109898/) shows both. Jul 15 14:54:52 probably unintended mistakes Jul 15 14:56:42 jow_laptop: With "staging_dir/host/bin/perl", how can packages that depend on PERL knows where perl libraries are? Jul 15 14:57:10 I meant no "staging_dir/host/bin/perl Jul 15 14:57:58 why do they need to know that? Jul 15 14:58:38 Some packages that depend on perl needs to know where perl files reside. Jul 15 14:58:49 which ones? Jul 15 15:00:53 freeswitch, mrtg, nocatauth, iptables, etc. Jul 15 15:02:53 mrtg just wants to know the interpreter path which you can pass in via ac_cv_path_PERL="/usr/bin/perl" Jul 15 15:04:19 nocatauth appears to be just a collection of perl scriptsd Jul 15 15:04:30 not sure why it would need to invoke perl during compilation Jul 15 15:04:42 or packaging rather since there is nothing to compile Jul 15 15:05:22 build #120 of cns3xxx is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/cns3xxx/builds/120 Jul 15 15:08:15 jow_laptop, but my freeswitch package will probably fail to build because it heavily depends on the output from 'perl' Jul 15 15:09:02 well then we have a conceptiual problem Jul 15 15:09:21 stuff cannot expect to be able to run executables while cross compiling Jul 15 15:10:05 the perl output needed by FS should be gathered on a target system and then hardcoded into the makefile Jul 15 15:12:30 Last week, I was about to commit new changes for FS package with heavily depends on the outputs of "perl -MConfig -e 'print $Config{archlib}", "perl -MConfig -e 'print $Config{libs}'", "perl -MExtUtils::Embed -e ccopts", "perl -MExtUtils::Embed -e perl_inc", etc. and they worked just fine, but not now. :( Jul 15 15:13:27 When I said 'perl', I meant 'staging_dir/target-arm_xscale_uClibc-0.9.33.2_eabi/usr/bin/perl'. Jul 15 15:14:07 or rather 'staging_dir//usr/bin/perl' Jul 15 15:14:50 Perhaps, we need to modify perl package so that it will install perl utilities on staging/host/bin? Jul 15 15:15:06 maybe Jul 15 15:15:07 I meant 'staging_dir/host/bin'. Jul 15 15:15:17 OK. Jul 15 15:53:15 build #525 of adm5120 is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/adm5120/builds/525 Jul 15 16:04:54 build #519 of gemini is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/gemini/builds/519 Jul 15 16:31:06 <_trine> http://pastebin.com/W2vyYqfZ Jul 15 16:31:13 <_trine> trunk fails Jul 15 17:02:02 <_trine> This is on a new trunk CO Jul 15 17:39:47 build #503 of mpc52xx is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/mpc52xx/builds/503 Jul 15 18:37:04 build #666 of cobalt is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/cobalt/builds/666 Jul 15 18:37:27 build #481 of octeon is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/octeon/builds/481 Jul 15 18:40:55 build #8 of x86.kvm_guest is complete: Failure [failed shell_14] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/x86.kvm_guest/builds/8 Jul 15 18:43:57 build #672 of orion is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/orion/builds/672 Jul 15 18:55:14 build #121 of pxa is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/pxa/builds/121 Jul 15 19:16:55 build #626 of ppc44x is complete: Failure [failed shell_9 shell_14] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ppc44x/builds/626 Jul 15 19:55:04 Hauke: hi Jul 15 19:55:11 zajec: hi Jul 15 19:55:13 Hauke: you could see I got my BCM43217 Jul 15 19:55:20 so adding support for it will be simple now Jul 15 19:55:28 nice Jul 15 19:55:47 and I'm quite happy with the support for BCM43228, looks stable (but that won't really help OpenWrt) Jul 15 19:56:47 unfortunately BCM43227 appeared to be quite disappointing :( Jul 15 19:56:55 it seesm to be exactly the same as BCM4328 Jul 15 19:56:59 same PHY, same radio Jul 15 19:57:02 identical radio Jul 15 19:57:21 so it's probably just a matter of some 5 GHz power amplifier stipped out or sth :( Jul 15 19:58:25 I was really hoping that BCM43227 will appear to be similar to what we have in BCM5357C0 and will help adding support for BCM5357C0 Jul 15 19:58:26 I think it is better to not have that much variants ;-) Jul 15 19:58:47 yeah, but since I can't RE BCM5357C0, I can't add support for it :( Jul 15 19:58:58 and I don't have any hardware similar to BCM5357C0 i could run on x86 Jul 15 19:59:08 it seems there isn't one :( Jul 15 20:00:21 you could get larry to write a spec with the differences Jul 15 20:01:17 yeah, that's the only change Jul 15 20:01:19 *chance Jul 15 20:01:30 now I know there isn't any other way, I'll have to ask him for help Jul 15 20:19:09 build #8 of x86.xen_domu is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/x86.xen_domu/builds/8 Jul 15 20:49:37 build #637 of uml is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/uml/builds/637 Jul 15 21:39:25 build #14 of ar71xx.nand is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ar71xx.nand/builds/14 Jul 15 21:42:44 build #595 of sibyte is complete: Failure [failed shell_9] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/sibyte/builds/595 Jul 15 21:57:07 hauke r41666 trunk/target/linux/ brcm47xx/patches-3.10/149-MIPS-BCM47XX-add-some-more-devices.patch brcm47xx/patches-3.14/146-MIPS-BCM47XX-Devices-database-update-for-3.17.patch brcm47xx/patches-3.10/146-MIPS-BCM47XX-Devices-database-update-for-3.17.patch brcm47xx/patches-3.14/149-MIPS-BCM47XX-add-some-more-devices.patch * brcm47xx: fix LEDs on WRT54GL Jul 15 21:57:08 OpenWrt 1.1 Jul 15 21:59:24 hauke r41667 trunk/target/linux/ brcm47xx/mips74k/profiles/101-Broadcom-brcsmac.mk brcm47xx/mips74k/profiles/102-Broadcom-wl.mk brcm47xx/mips74k/profiles/100-Broadcom-b43.mk brcm47xx/mips74k/profiles/103-Broadcom-none.mk * brcm47xx: remove kmod-bgmac from profile Jul 15 22:00:14 hauke r41668 trunk/package/kernel/mac80211/patches/ (6 files) * mac80211: b43: backport b43 patches from wireless testing Jul 15 22:05:22 hauke r41669 trunk/target/linux/au1000/Makefile * au1000: update to kernel 3.10.44 Jul 15 22:33:41 build #14 of ar71xx.mikrotik is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ar71xx.mikrotik/builds/14 Jul 15 22:39:12 build #14 of lantiq.xrx200 is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/lantiq.xrx200/builds/14 Jul 15 22:41:17 build #607 of avr32 is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/avr32/builds/607 Jul 16 00:08:54 build #14 of brcm63xx.smp is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/brcm63xx.smp/builds/14 Jul 16 01:28:05 build #14 of ramips.rt3883 is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ramips.rt3883/builds/14 Jul 16 02:14:26 * swalker throws a few rocks at trac **** ENDING LOGGING AT Wed Jul 16 02:59:59 2014