**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Wed Oct 01 03:00:00 2014 Oct 01 03:33:28 build #193 of adm8668 is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/adm8668/builds/193 Oct 01 07:59:49 rmilecki r42708 trunk/target/linux/bcm53xx/patches-3.14/ 043-ARM-BCM5301X-add-dts-files-for-BCM4708-SoC.patch 050-ARM-BCM5301X-add-dts-files-for-BCM4708-SoC.patch * bcm53xx: rename BCM5301X DTS patch to match upstream order Oct 01 08:12:16 build #590 of mcs814x is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/mcs814x/builds/590 Oct 01 08:15:56 build #703 of ppc44x is complete: Failure [failed shell_10] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ppc44x/builds/703 Oct 01 09:19:20 cyrus r42709 packages/utils/zsh * zsh: moved to github Oct 01 10:07:06 jow_laptop hi jow, just to let you know that my problem was indeed the lack of kmod-8021q Oct 01 10:07:50 jow_laptop I wonder if it would be interesting to add some kind of check if someone add a vlan interface and doesn't have the module installed/loaded Oct 01 10:08:22 Devastator: in the old days where vconfig was used it printed a fat warning on the console Oct 01 10:08:51 Devastator: maybe netifd should syslog some errors if the netlink vlan add operation fails (it will likely return with -ENOSYS, -NOTSUPP or something similar) Oct 01 10:09:33 jow_laptop if you guide me I can try to propose a patch Oct 01 10:10:50 <__trine> jow_laptop, have you found any time yet to fix the enable/disable wifi buttons in ckient mode in LUCI Oct 01 10:12:03 __trine: I couldn't reproduce thep roblem Oct 01 10:12:19 <__trine> well its there all the time Oct 01 10:13:42 <__trine> what you need to do is to connect as a client then try the enable/disable buttons Oct 01 10:14:03 <__trine> then they dont work Oct 01 10:14:42 <__trine> in AP mode they work OK Oct 01 10:20:15 also I'm encountering trouble while compiling my own builds, I've cloned 14.07 repo, but it seems to be quite different than what downloads.openwrt.org/barrier_breaker/14.07/ have Oct 01 10:21:06 <__trine> jow_laptop, can you give it another try? Oct 01 10:21:16 don't know why opkg is configured to use downloads.openwrt.org/snapshots/trunk when compiling own builds.. Oct 01 10:27:29 and about netifd syslog error if netlink vlan add operation fails, what do you think about something here in setup_interface()? https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/branches/barrier_breaker/package/network/config/netifd/files/lib/network/config.sh Oct 01 10:30:50 <__trine> jow_laptop, I suppose I could set teamviewer up if you cannot find it yourself Oct 01 11:17:49 <__trine> jow_laptop, will you tell me if you are proposing to resolve the LUCI bug Oct 01 11:18:15 I do, will take al ook later Oct 01 11:23:05 is there a way to build my own images the same as official ones? Oct 01 11:38:29 I would use official ones, but I wanted a bigger rootfs :( Oct 01 11:43:24 jow_laptop about netifd syslog error if netlink vlan add operation fails, what do you think about something here in setup_interface()? https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/branches/barrier_breaker/package/network/config/netifd/files/lib/network/config.sh Oct 01 11:55:44 not really, sorry, now I see that netifd sources are in another git repo Oct 01 12:15:25 when a package is as module in menuconfig, what does this mean? Oct 01 12:21:30 an ipk for that is generated Oct 01 12:24:37 plntyk thanks! makes sense Oct 01 12:35:40 Mazilo, ping Oct 01 12:36:11 slachta: pong Oct 01 12:36:57 Mazilo, would you be so kind to add the rpath to LDFLAGS in freeswitch only when mod-perl is selected? Oct 01 12:37:17 slachta: I am working on it. Oct 01 12:37:22 otherwise the freeswitch is linked to perl even if the perl is not selected Oct 01 12:37:30 Mazilo, ok then :) Oct 01 12:37:32 thank you Oct 01 12:37:39 slachta: NP. Oct 01 12:50:22 anyone tried getting rust up on openwrt? Oct 01 12:51:05 I found this person's post, http://blog.csdn.net/liigo/article/details/39347541 but it's pretty manual. Oct 01 13:02:53 <_trine> jow_laptop, what am I missing when these lines fail in my firewall.user Oct 01 13:02:56 <_trine> iptables -I FORWARD -p tcp --dport 2255 -m state --state NEW -m recent --update --seconds 600 --hitcount 3 -j DROP Oct 01 13:02:56 <_trine> iptables -I FORWARD -p tcp --dport 2255 -m state --state NEW -m recent --set Oct 01 13:03:12 <_trine> ! Failed with exit code 2 Oct 01 13:03:59 <_trine> I have conntrack extra Oct 01 13:06:18 anyone has a lantiq with an annex a adsl? Oct 01 13:14:35 build #749 of orion is complete: Failure [failed compile_8] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/orion/builds/749 Oct 01 13:30:52 build #672 of sibyte is complete: Failure [failed shell_10] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/sibyte/builds/672 Oct 01 13:38:22 rmilecki r42710 trunk/target/linux/ (5 files in 3 dirs) * kernel: update bcma to the tag master-2014-09-30 (wireless-next) Oct 01 13:39:35 rmilecki r42711 trunk/target/linux/bcm53xx/patches-3.14/ 047-ARM-BCM5301X-Add-LEDs-for-Netgear-R6250-V1.patch 046-ARM-BCM5301X-Add-Broadcom-s-bus-axi-to-the-DTS-file.patch 130-ARM-BCM5301X-register-bcma-bus.patch * bcm53xx: add BCM5301X patches sent upstream (bus and R6250 LEDs) Oct 01 13:39:37 rmilecki: nice work Oct 01 13:39:42 i know, thanks Oct 01 13:39:45 ;) :P Oct 01 14:10:53 zajec hahah! Oct 01 14:13:53 lol Oct 01 14:28:16 build #684 of avr32 is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/avr32/builds/684 Oct 01 15:05:06 hmm Oct 01 15:05:29 is a v6-only configuration supposed to be possible for downstream interfaces? Oct 01 15:06:43 http://paste.debian.net/123999/ Oct 01 15:07:07 foo correctly gets assigned a v6 prefix (let's say 2001:db8:0:100::/56) Oct 01 15:07:41 but no IPv6 address is set on interface bar (I would expect 2001:db8:0:200::1/56) Oct 01 15:09:45 ifstatus does not show any prefix on bar: Oct 01 15:09:46 http://paste.debian.net/124001/ Oct 01 15:10:17 zorun: is your delegated prefix big enough? Oct 01 15:10:49 while on foo, ifstatus is happy: http://paste.debian.net/124002/ Oct 01 15:10:52 cyrusff: yes, it's a /48 Oct 01 15:13:12 it's bb-rc3, btw Oct 01 15:53:17 cyrusff: alright, it works fine with BB Oct 01 15:53:28 not sure if it is because of the upgrade or the reboot, though Oct 01 15:57:30 cyrusff: alright, when I add a new UCI interface with a v6-only config, and issue /etc/init.d/network reload, the new interface does not get a prefix Oct 01 15:57:44 with /etc/init.d/network restart, it works, though Oct 01 17:10:35 build #775 of at91 is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/at91/builds/775 Oct 01 17:46:00 yo, trying to boot a gateworks ventana board with stock openwrt. looks like the kernel isnt even in the images it builds Oct 01 17:46:11 how would i make sure the kernel gets put in the image? Oct 01 17:46:23 can i manually put files into built ubifs? Oct 01 17:47:39 <_trine> aep, is this patch relevant http://patchwork.openwrt.org/patch/6092/ Oct 01 17:48:19 looks like it. hm Oct 01 17:49:31 oh yeah. i did _not_ compile openwrt trunk but some old thing. meh Oct 01 17:50:06 <_trine> you will need trunk for sure Oct 01 17:50:33 build #608 of iop32x is complete: Failure [failed shell_10] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/iop32x/builds/608 Oct 01 17:55:52 is git behind svn or something? Oct 01 17:55:55 i cant find that commit Oct 01 17:57:08 oh it says rejectec Oct 01 17:58:54 the last commit for ventana i found actually breaks it intentionally Oct 01 17:59:08 svn://svn.openwrt.org/openwrt/trunk@42071 Oct 01 18:00:47 luka: are you intending to bring bootable images back or is this just unsupported? Oct 01 18:13:36 cyrus r42712 packages/libs/xmlrpc-c * xmlrpc-c: moved to github Oct 01 18:13:38 cyrus r42713 packages/libs/confuse * confuse: moved to github Oct 01 18:13:41 cyrus r42714 packages/net/lispmob * lispmob: moved to github Oct 01 18:39:17 nbd, 521-ath9k_cur_txpower.patch Oct 01 18:39:20 what is this for ? Oct 01 18:44:54 ah no forget it Oct 01 18:45:33 I thought it was to fix the TX power by using external LNA Oct 01 18:52:51 does anybody know if I use a config like this and change the rootfs size, will the md5sum change for kernel and the image itself? Oct 01 18:53:12 an example, if I use this config.. http://downloads.openwrt.org/barrier_breaker/14.07/ar71xx/generic/config.ar71xx_generic Oct 01 18:53:18 of course the md5sum will change Oct 01 18:53:59 so if I use this config without touching anything, the md5sum and kernel md5sum will stay the same, right? Oct 01 18:54:27 probably not. other parts will also differ in your build environment Oct 01 18:54:47 at least there will be different timestamps Oct 01 18:54:48 the letters and numbers in front of kernel package is a md5sum, right? Oct 01 18:55:12 do you have an example? Oct 01 18:55:21 could be a git commit-id Oct 01 18:55:45 http://downloads.openwrt.org/barrier_breaker/14.07/ar71xx/generic/packages/base/kernel_3.10.49-1-0114c71ed85677c9c1e4911437af4743_ar71xx.ipk Oct 01 18:55:52 that 0114c... Oct 01 18:56:10 not sure, but i don't think it's the md5sum of the file Oct 01 18:56:24 probably a commit-id Oct 01 18:56:32 let me check Oct 01 18:57:11 google returned nothing.. Oct 01 18:57:23 it's an md5sum, and it should stay the same as long as you don't disable any kmods/change any kernel configuration options Oct 01 18:57:52 md5sum of just the config? Oct 01 18:58:04 iirc yes Oct 01 18:58:14 the kernel config, not openwrt config Oct 01 18:58:24 all I want is an official image with bigger rootfs, if I change rootfs size, does the md5sum changes? Oct 01 18:58:37 of the image? yes Oct 01 18:58:56 if the rootfs size is exposed through a kernel config option then yes, if not then it shouldn't Oct 01 18:59:32 Devastator: which md5sum do you mean? the one in the filename? Oct 01 18:59:40 deki yes Oct 01 18:59:43 Devastator: why not just try it out - if you don't have any feeds installed it should still give you the right md5sum and doesn't take too long to build ;) Oct 01 18:59:47 and why is that important? Oct 01 19:00:59 KanjiMonster I tried to build the config here: http://downloads.openwrt.org/barrier_breaker/14.07/octeon/generic/config.octeon_generic but it fails Oct 01 19:01:11 it fails? Oct 01 19:01:13 maybe some host dependency Oct 01 19:01:17 yes Oct 01 19:01:40 I'm compiling again and saving to a file to check why it fails Oct 01 19:01:54 unfortunately shift+page up doesn't show much Oct 01 19:02:22 deki because when I try to install a kernel module it doesn't install because it thinks I'm using a different kernel Oct 01 19:02:35 ah, get it :) Oct 01 19:03:37 are you compiling with a single process? then you should see why it fails at the end … Oct 01 19:04:05 build #199 of brcm2708 is complete: Failure [failed compile_4] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/brcm2708/builds/199 Oct 01 19:05:29 deki it just say [/home/devas/openwrt/target-......../stamp/.package_compile] Error 2 Oct 01 19:05:44 and the lines above? Oct 01 19:05:45 and the last directory it left was libugpio Oct 01 19:05:56 can you paste some more context? Oct 01 19:06:46 deki I wish I could, that's why I'm compiling again saving the compile log Oct 01 19:13:52 KanjiMonster I meant to say it fails to compile :) Oct 01 22:28:27 adri: ping Oct 01 23:21:37 build #551 of octeon is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/octeon/builds/551 Oct 02 00:13:23 ^ libatomic toolchain bustage **** ENDING LOGGING AT Thu Oct 02 03:00:00 2014