**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Fri Jan 16 03:00:15 2015 Jan 16 03:27:49 build #187 of x86.kvm_guest is complete: Exception [exception MasterShellCommand] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/x86.kvm_guest/builds/187 Jan 16 03:44:39 build #691 of ep93xx is complete: Failure [failed compile_8] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ep93xx/builds/691 Jan 16 04:20:10 build #629 of octeon is complete: Exception [exception MasterShellCommand] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/octeon/builds/629 Jan 16 04:49:35 build #283 of mpc83xx is complete: Exception [exception MasterShellCommand] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/mpc83xx/builds/283 Jan 16 05:03:28 build #676 of adm5120 is complete: Exception [exception MasterShellCommand] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/adm5120/builds/676 Jan 16 05:25:57 build #489 of mpc85xx is complete: Exception [exception MasterShellCommand] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/mpc85xx/builds/489 Jan 16 05:26:18 build #165 of x86.xen_domu is complete: Exception [exception MasterShellCommand] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/x86.xen_domu/builds/165 Jan 16 05:37:38 build #187 of ar71xx.nand is complete: Exception [exception MasterShellCommand] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ar71xx.nand/builds/187 Jan 16 05:37:40 build #673 of mcs814x is complete: Exception [exception MasterShellCommand] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/mcs814x/builds/673 Jan 16 05:49:50 build #863 of at91 is complete: Exception [exception MasterShellCommand] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/at91/builds/863 Jan 16 05:54:49 build #283 of cns3xxx is complete: Exception [exception MasterShellCommand] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/cns3xxx/builds/283 Jan 16 06:35:59 build #309 of cns21xx is complete: Failure [failed compile_4] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/cns21xx/builds/309 Jan 16 07:03:46 build #818 of uml is complete: Exception [exception MasterShellCommand] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/uml/builds/818 Jan 16 07:05:27 build #40 of ramips.mt7621 is complete: Failure [failed compile_4] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ramips.mt7621/builds/40 Jan 16 07:29:57 build #299 of bcm53xx is complete: Exception [exception MasterShellCommand] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/bcm53xx/builds/299 Jan 16 07:49:40 build #810 of x86 is complete: Exception [exception MasterShellCommand] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/x86/builds/810 Jan 16 08:18:30 build #811 of rb532 is complete: Exception [exception MasterShellCommand] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/rb532/builds/811 Jan 16 08:24:47 build #850 of cobalt is complete: Exception [exception MasterShellCommand] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/cobalt/builds/850 Jan 16 08:39:28 build #40 of ipq806x is complete: Failure [failed compile_4] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ipq806x/builds/40 Jan 16 08:39:28 build #307 of malta is complete: Exception [exception MasterShellCommand] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/malta/builds/307 Jan 16 08:39:37 build #179 of lantiq.xrx200 is complete: Exception [exception MasterShellCommand] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/lantiq.xrx200/builds/179 Jan 16 08:46:33 kaloz r43978 trunk/ target/linux/mvebu/base-files/etc/uci-defaults/01_leds package/kernel/linux/modules/leds.mk * mvebu: fixups for the new driver Jan 16 08:46:59 build #308 of pxa is complete: Failure [failed compile_4] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/pxa/builds/308 Jan 16 08:50:55 build #177 of ar71xx.mikrotik is complete: Exception [exception MasterShellCommand] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ar71xx.mikrotik/builds/177 Jan 16 09:10:05 build #274 of adm8668 is complete: Exception [exception MasterShellCommand] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/adm8668/builds/274 Jan 16 09:15:33 build #757 of ixp4xx is complete: Exception [exception MasterShellCommand] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ixp4xx/builds/757 Jan 16 09:26:19 build #779 of xburst is complete: Failure [failed compile_8] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/xburst/builds/779 Jan 16 09:52:55 build #401 of mxs is complete: Exception [exception MasterShellCommand] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/mxs/builds/401 Jan 16 10:36:44 build #190 of brcm63xx.smp is complete: Exception [exception MasterShellCommand] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/brcm63xx.smp/builds/190 Jan 16 10:37:02 build #752 of kirkwood is complete: Exception [exception MasterShellCommand] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/kirkwood/builds/752 Jan 16 10:57:15 build #749 of ar71xx is complete: Exception [exception MasterShellCommand] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ar71xx/builds/749 Jan 16 11:50:53 cyrusff: did you see my v2 series of patches for iproute2 a few days ago? Jan 16 11:51:12 russell--: hmm must have overlooked it Jan 16 11:51:35 it builds with musl for me now ;-) Jan 16 11:51:40 nice Jan 16 11:51:42 Hi, just asking but is there activity on closed tickets for discussions ? Jan 16 11:51:43 will try it later Jan 16 11:51:46 cool Jan 16 11:52:16 thinking about this -> https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/11779 Jan 16 11:52:44 Because I see only active tickets there : https://dev.openwrt.org/report Jan 16 12:13:03 Dr-Shadow: hwnat discussion by people unfamiliar with the inner workings of the network stack is typically useless Jan 16 12:13:13 because adding hwnat support is not a simple code porting exercise Jan 16 12:14:10 it can only be implemented with some understanding of how netfilter works, how the network stack works, and how to integrate something that bypasses parts of those two Jan 16 12:23:39 and there is a disclaimer attached to hwnat that some features do not work if thats enabled - at least the original fw mentions that Jan 16 12:23:53 yes Jan 16 12:42:56 what kind of features ? Jan 16 12:45:16 Dr-Shadow: try this: http://forums.smallnetbuilder.com/showpost.php?p=127253&postcount=2 Jan 16 12:45:36 ty Jan 16 12:45:40 i guess Broadcom's CTF module is similar to hwnat if you consider net layer integration Jan 16 12:46:40 build #40 of arm64 is complete: Exception [exception MasterShellCommand] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/arm64/builds/40 Jan 16 12:47:46 so hwnat currently break some features but could this be fixed or not ? Jan 16 12:48:21 that depends on the hardware Jan 16 12:48:30 some things can't be fixed Jan 16 12:48:45 some could depending on hw capabilities and extending interface Jan 16 12:50:34 That's weird. I only get 200Mb Wan<->Lan (and maybe a bit more with some optimizations) where I should get 300Mb. And I will switch to 1Gb fiber in some months so I'm looking for a router able to handle a gigabit Wan Jan 16 12:50:44 rmilecki r43979 trunk/target/ (16 files in 2 dirs) * brcm47xx: backport BCM47XX arch patches (clean NVRAM code, later init) Jan 16 12:51:13 I will send back the router I got (TL-WDR3600) and I'm looking for something else Jan 16 12:51:20 yeah, 1Gb/s NAT is a bit task for routers Jan 16 12:51:26 for these poor CPUs :| Jan 16 12:51:45 Some ppl told be to get a computer with a good network card but that's weird too Jan 16 12:52:31 Dr-Shadow, with wdr4900 you can expect 40 MB/s on IPv4 and i think i got a bit over 50 MB/s with IPv6 Jan 16 12:54:17 still weird :/ Jan 16 12:54:43 But I was expecting this for wdr4900 (I checked it on the net) Jan 16 12:55:06 Archer C7 v2 is supposed to get 800Mb/s with hwnat Jan 16 12:57:03 As far as I could see now, all chips with hwnat got implemented with closed source, right ? Why isn't there one open source ? Jan 16 12:57:17 (stupid question I know but still asking) Jan 16 12:59:04 competitive advantage by Intellectual Property, Patents Jan 16 12:59:15 hm, i was thinking Broadocm used open source solution Jan 16 12:59:18 guess I was wrong Jan 16 13:00:44 I mean the data sheets of 8327(N) leaked(?) and from that it might be possible to build an open driver Jan 16 13:01:12 even ralink got weird things with hwnat https://code.google.com/p/rt-n56u/issues/detail?id=258 Jan 16 13:01:24 build #852 of lantiq is complete: Exception [exception MasterShellCommand] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/lantiq/builds/852 Jan 16 14:11:00 build #191 of brcm47xx.mips74k is complete: Exception [exception MasterShellCommand] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/brcm47xx.mips74k/builds/191 Jan 16 14:15:44 Dr-Shadow, plntyk, zajec: even if a vendor hwnat implementation opened up, it's useless until somebody with a clue about the network stack starts designing a decent offload solution Jan 16 14:16:12 i have seen the source code of several vendor hwnat implementations Jan 16 14:16:27 and the difficult part is not programming the hardware Jan 16 14:16:32 that's actually quite simple Jan 16 14:16:38 integrating it into the network stack is the hard part Jan 16 14:17:42 nbd: [18:33:46] <[florian]> e.g: there is some work going on to support generic flows of packets, and program the HW accordingly, so far, only the layer 2/3 cases have been covered, but layer 4 and NAT are on their way Jan 16 14:17:47 is this something different ? Jan 16 14:18:36 it's going to take some time for that to materialize Jan 16 14:18:50 and quite a few people working on that stuff actually have much more of an enterprise hardware focus Jan 16 14:19:03 build #722 of au1000 is complete: Exception [exception MasterShellCommand] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/au1000/builds/722 Jan 16 14:19:13 so first we need to see whether the abstractions that come out of this regarding nat offload will be suitable for smaller scale hardware Jan 16 14:19:27 I wonder how that hwnat design actually works Jan 16 14:19:37 I suppose it only works with a simple lan/wan setup Jan 16 14:19:42 which one? Jan 16 14:19:49 any one actually Jan 16 14:20:14 typically it's not limited to a simple lan/wan setup Jan 16 14:20:18 it works like this: Jan 16 14:20:35 packets run through the normal netfilter codepath until the connection is fully set up, tracked, and nat has been applied Jan 16 14:20:58 then the information for that connection is translated into something the hardware (or a software fast path) can understand Jan 16 14:21:10 so all further packets bypass netfilter entirely Jan 16 14:21:16 then there are some hacks to keep the conntrack entry alive Jan 16 14:21:21 so it doesn't time out due to lack of packets Jan 16 14:21:30 sounds exactly like what I saw in Broadcom's SDK :) Jan 16 14:21:38 yeah Jan 16 14:21:53 ah ok Jan 16 14:22:02 it's just that we will not merge such hackery in openwrt Jan 16 14:22:05 it's fragile Jan 16 14:22:09 breaks easily with netfilter updates Jan 16 14:22:11 so iptables can, simply speaking, delegate streams to the hw engine Jan 16 14:22:14 causes subtle issues with various protocols Jan 16 14:22:26 yes Jan 16 14:22:35 obviously that breaks qos as well Jan 16 14:23:01 there's no easy way to detect in what cases offloading should be disabled Jan 16 14:23:09 due to qos, special firewall rules, etc. Jan 16 14:23:23 an insane number of corner cases to deal with Jan 16 14:23:33 Then you have fun with tunnels, ipsec, qos... Jan 16 14:23:59 yeah but thats what I meant with simple setups Jan 16 14:24:17 I could for exmaple imagine Jan 16 14:24:30 ... that the hw engine does not understand vlan tags or stuff like that Jan 16 14:24:38 i think it typically does Jan 16 14:24:42 ok Jan 16 14:28:12 btw. what do you think about requiring that any newly added device must use the new image building code? Jan 16 14:28:34 oh, meant to write that in the other channel, but i guess it's fine here as well Jan 16 14:29:10 nbd: i suggest giving a one more month or sth Jan 16 14:29:16 nbd: to let more targets adopt it Jan 16 14:29:21 and have some better reference Jan 16 14:29:25 I'll work on Broadcom targets Jan 16 14:29:35 ok, thx Jan 16 14:38:41 jow_laptop, is there a way to detect number of antennas ports and pass it to LuCI ? Jan 16 14:39:38 taken into account all cases Jan 16 14:43:47 nighty-_: maybe with iw Jan 16 14:44:44 you know some 802.11n card 3T2R for example will not allow 1T2R mode on all CH Jan 16 14:45:05 but it seems I can not know that at least from iw Jan 16 14:45:22 or maybe I did not see how at least Jan 16 14:46:26 then I do not know either Jan 16 14:46:41 most mac80211 userspace apis are ... incomplete Jan 16 14:47:01 I see :( Jan 16 14:52:13 build #220 of brcm47xx.legacy is complete: Exception [exception MasterShellCommand] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/brcm47xx.legacy/builds/220 Jan 16 14:53:11 rmilecki r43980 trunk/config/Config-kernel.in * config: enable EARLY_PRINTK on bcm53xx by default Jan 16 15:17:23 nbd, I got an Archer C7 and saw that the 5GHz WLAN doesn't support AP and IBSS at the same time. Is this a driver issue? Can it expected to be fixed any time soon? Jan 16 15:17:28 build #855 of orion is complete: Failure [failed compile_8] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/orion/builds/855 Jan 16 15:19:21 neoraider: from openwrt wiki -> "For the Archer C7 v1.x and WDR7500 v2.x, the 5GHz 802.11a/n/ac functionality is not supported, and likely will never be, since support for the AR1A (v1) variant of QCA9880 chip is not included in the open source ath10k driver. The Archer C7 v2.x uses the BR4A (v2) variant which is supported in ath10k ath10k Linux" Jan 16 15:19:40 I hope your hardware version is ok Jan 16 15:20:06 Yes, I have c2 Jan 16 15:20:08 *v2 Jan 16 15:24:00 neoraider: afaik the AP + IBSS issue is a limit from the firmware - there are several different ath10k firmwares available : 3rd vendor (candelatech), AP "specialized" firmware and "default" firmware - i think another firmware with new api was in preparation Jan 16 15:24:34 http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/ath10k/firmware Jan 16 15:25:19 http://www.candelatech.com/ath10k.php Jan 16 15:37:25 Hmm. Jan 16 15:37:56 build #860 of atheros is complete: Exception [exception MasterShellCommand] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/atheros/builds/860 Jan 16 15:38:21 build #867 of brcm47xx is complete: Exception [exception MasterShellCommand] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/brcm47xx/builds/867 Jan 16 15:44:47 Btw, I think all routers are using hwnat there : http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/tools/charts/router/view right ? Jan 16 15:45:27 (the ones ranked top ofc) Jan 16 15:57:45 Dr-Shadow: R6300 doesn't use hw nat (782.6 Mb/s) Jan 16 16:01:46 rmilecki r43981 trunk/target/ linux/bcm53xx/patches-3.18/901-bcma-register-SoC-later-as-a-module.patch linux/bcm53xx/patches-3.14/901-bcma-register-SoC-later-as-a-module.patch * bcm53xx: drop hacky patch making bcma init later Jan 16 16:04:54 Dr-Shadow: oh, and there is RT-AC66U on the list... it also doesn't support hw nat Jan 16 16:05:00 doesn't have I meant Jan 16 16:05:20 see, even software fast path can be very powerful :) Jan 16 16:06:27 zajec: http://event.asus.com/2012/nw/dummy_ui/FR/Advanced_SwitchCtrl_Content.html Jan 16 16:06:31 check page title Jan 16 16:06:37 this is RT-AC66U Jan 16 16:06:53 there is hw acceleration too Jan 16 16:07:31 same for R6300 -> http://www.dd-wrt.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=933943&sid=e815700608bf199ccc872dcd47996a09 Jan 16 16:07:32 hm... according to the user manual for r6300 there are 2 NAT Filtering - secured/open where "Open NAT provides a much less secured firewall, but allows almost all Internet applications to function. " Jan 16 16:08:51 Dr-Shadow: well the link for netgear differs because of v1 MIPS with HW accel vs. v2 that supposedly runs ARM with no HW accel Jan 16 16:09:09 i think that zajec was suggesting that arm device has no hw accel Jan 16 16:09:13 This is what I expected after reading Jan 16 16:10:39 But I think this is strange for R6300 Jan 16 16:10:39 shouldnt these routers support EEE ? i cannot find anything in the manual about this - and several consumer switches have these (dlink green series for example) Jan 16 16:11:01 I really wonder if they use hw acceleration or not Jan 16 16:11:20 and these data sheets are more like marketing material ... Jan 16 16:12:01 Dr-Shadow: afaik MIPS devices don't have hw acceleration Jan 16 16:12:12 Dr-Shadow: some may call it so... for marketing or by mistake Jan 16 16:12:19 but I think MIPS doesn't have hw acceleration Jan 16 16:12:22 it has only ctf.ko Jan 16 16:12:29 which is a software fast path Jan 16 16:12:41 Dr-Shadow: i'm talking abut Broadcom MIPS of course Jan 16 16:12:56 Dr-Shadow: non-Broadcom SoCs may be hw nat, no idea Jan 16 16:13:56 Dr-Shadow: this dd-wrt forum posts tells about Kong's acceleration... so see: http://www.dd-wrt.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=909086 - even it says it's for ARM only Jan 16 16:14:28 oh, this is a mess Jan 16 16:14:30 "DDTB (DD-WRT TurboBoost; the re-implementation of Broadcom's CTF)" Jan 16 16:14:37 but Broadcom's CTF is a software acceleration... Jan 16 16:17:05 hahah "turboboost" - a dogdog Jan 16 16:18:06 i propose OWHMUSSSB =open wrts hyper mega ultra super sonic speed boost Jan 16 16:25:20 build #654 of mpc52xx is complete: Exception [exception MasterShellCommand] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/mpc52xx/builds/654 Jan 16 16:27:59 whats up with the buildbots ... [Errno 12] Cannot allocate memory ? :/ Jan 16 16:30:30 build #892 of brcm63xx is complete: Exception [exception MasterShellCommand] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/brcm63xx/builds/892 Jan 16 16:41:02 build #40 of ramips.mt7628 is complete: Exception [exception MasterShellCommand] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ramips.mt7628/builds/40 Jan 16 16:50:37 build #40 of netlogic is complete: Exception [exception MasterShellCommand] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/netlogic/builds/40 Jan 16 16:52:46 does anyone see a reason for the 'sleep 10' in ddns-scripts? https://github.com/openwrt/packages/blob/master/net/ddns-scripts/files/usr/lib/ddns/dynamic_dns_updater.sh#L216 Jan 16 16:53:22 the comment is wrong btw - netifd calls the script only after addresses have been assigned Jan 16 17:21:29 build #670 of gemini is complete: Exception [exception MasterShellCommand] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/gemini/builds/670 Jan 16 17:22:06 build #40 of ramips.mt7620 is complete: Exception [exception MasterShellCommand] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ramips.mt7620/builds/40 Jan 16 17:26:45 eigma: its discussed on openwrt-devel atm Jan 16 17:30:28 build #308 of realview is complete: Exception [exception MasterShellCommand] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/realview/builds/308 Jan 16 18:25:53 build #194 of ramips.rt3883 is complete: Exception [exception MasterShellCommand] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ramips.rt3883/builds/194 Jan 16 18:49:11 build #42 of oxnas is complete: Exception [exception MasterShellCommand] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/oxnas/builds/42 Jan 16 18:57:43 build #782 of avr32 is complete: Failure [failed compile_5] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/avr32/builds/782 Jan 16 18:58:03 build #372 of mvebu is complete: Failure [failed compile_4] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/mvebu/builds/372 Jan 16 19:00:28 build #284 of brcm2708 is complete: Failure [failed compile_4] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/brcm2708/builds/284 Jan 16 19:06:36 jow r43982 trunk/package/ network/services/dnsmasq/files/dhcp.conf network/services/dnsmasq/files/dnsmasq.init network/services/dnsmasq/Makefile * dnsmasq: support and use local-service by default (#14951) Jan 16 19:33:58 build #835 of ppc40x is complete: Failure [failed compile_4] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ppc40x/builds/835 Jan 16 19:42:58 build #287 of sunxi is complete: Failure [failed compile_4] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/sunxi/builds/287 Jan 16 20:37:24 build #265 of omap is complete: Failure [failed compile_4] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/omap/builds/265 Jan 16 20:44:27 build #310 of x86_64 is complete: Exception [exception MasterShellCommand] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/x86_64/builds/310 Jan 16 21:29:38 to whom it may concern: alpine and libnfc exist both in packages and oldpackages Jan 16 21:35:56 build #841 of ramips is complete: Exception [exception MasterShellCommand] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ramips/builds/841 Jan 16 21:37:23 nvm Jan 16 21:38:54 build #417 of imx6 is complete: Exception [exception MasterShellCommand] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/imx6/builds/417 Jan 16 22:43:13 who is handling IMX6 ? Jan 16 23:35:19 uhm.. is there something wrong with luci on current trunk? index page has error, does not render and shows: error on line 35 at column 57: expected '>' Jan 16 23:35:56 build #811 of x86 is complete: Exception [exception MasterShellCommand] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/x86/builds/811 Jan 16 23:36:54 dape_: need more context Jan 16 23:37:22 dape_: best is you pastebin the browser source view Jan 16 23:38:04 jow_laptop http://codepad.org/UtL9PlE5 Jan 16 23:39:00 and screenshot - http://i.imgur.com/JG0oOpS.png Jan 16 23:40:43 fix pushed: https://github.com/openwrt/luci/commit/4abf1caa3f088701fcb8bd428e7e78f74ef5e377 Jan 16 23:41:03 thank you very much Jan 16 23:49:02 jow_laptop looks okay now, one more thing if i may, is the load suppose to look like this? http://i.imgur.com/wkuOtQt.png **** ENDING LOGGING AT Sat Jan 17 02:59:59 2015