**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Thu Jul 16 02:59:59 2015
Jul 16 05:56:10 <DonkeyHotei> karlp: https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?id=57073
Jul 16 06:38:11 <builder> build #61 of mpc83xx is complete: Failure [failed shell_10]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/mpc83xx/builds/61
Jul 16 07:01:32 <builder> build #61 of ep93xx is complete: Failure [failed shell_10]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ep93xx/builds/61
Jul 16 08:39:58 <builder> build #61 of mpc52xx is complete: Failure [failed shell_10]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/mpc52xx/builds/61
Jul 16 10:16:00 <karlp> DonkeyHotei: that's not the /tmp vs /dev issue though :)
Jul 16 10:16:42 <builder> build #61 of gemini is complete: Failure [failed compile_5]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/gemini/builds/61
Jul 16 10:50:47 <pachulo> I've just read this: http://bbs.t-firefly.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=580&extra=page%3D1
Jul 16 10:52:15 <pachulo> does it mean that they won't produce a final version of the product but other vendors might do products based on it?
Jul 16 11:12:28 <OpenWrt-Commits> jogo r46387 trunk/package/kernel/linux/modules/wpan.mk * kernel: wpan: at86rf230 depends on regmap-spi
Jul 16 11:13:09 <OpenWrt-Commits> jogo r46388 trunk/target/linux/brcm63xx/dts/hg553.dts * brcm63xx: HG553 buttons support
Jul 16 11:13:23 <OpenWrt-Commits> jogo r46389 trunk/include/image.mk * image.mk: add a BuildDTB define
Jul 16 11:14:15 <OpenWrt-Commits> jogo r46390 trunk/target/linux/brcm63xx/image/Makefile * brcm63xx: make use of the new BuildDTB command
Jul 16 11:15:36 <OpenWrt-Commits> jogo r46391 trunk/target/linux/brcm63xx/dts/ (78 files) * brcm63xx: make use of dt-includes
Jul 16 11:20:55 <plntyk> pachulo: maybe - but considering the cost comment even open sourcing the layout might not help if there are supply chain problems with (probably) several chips on that board
Jul 16 11:22:06 <plntyk> replacing one chip might be possible but it seems from the message that there might be several chips that other vendors like to "customize"
Jul 16 11:22:17 <plntyk> =make cheaper
Jul 16 12:31:13 <pachulo> plntyk: what a pitty then, it looked really promising :(
Jul 16 14:52:27 <DonkeyHotei> karlp: actually, it is, the permissions problem was just masking it
Jul 16 19:56:44 <builder> build #63 of orion is complete: Failure [failed shell_10]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/orion/builds/63
Jul 16 19:56:51 <builder> build #63 of cns21xx is complete: Failure [failed shell_10]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/cns21xx/builds/63
Jul 16 19:58:17 <builder> build #63 of cobalt is complete: Failure [failed shell_10]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/cobalt/builds/63
Jul 16 20:02:12 <builder> build #63 of pxa is complete: Failure [failed shell_10]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/pxa/builds/63
Jul 16 20:02:17 <builder> build #62 of avr32 is complete: Failure [failed shell_10]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/avr32/builds/62
Jul 16 20:02:31 <builder> build #63 of ppc40x is complete: Failure [failed shell_10]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ppc40x/builds/63
Jul 16 21:33:12 <builder> build #63 of brcm63xx is complete: Failure [failed compile_5]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/brcm63xx/builds/63
Jul 16 22:20:26 <builder> build #65 of brcm63xx.smp is complete: Failure [failed compile_5]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/brcm63xx.smp/builds/65
**** ENDING LOGGING AT Fri Jul 17 02:59:58 2015