**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Thu May 26 02:59:58 2016 May 26 03:36:42 just a quick question May 26 03:37:06 the ppp daemon (default) can't do PPPOE server right ? May 26 03:37:17 one need rp-pppoe for that , correct ? May 26 03:37:30 which old packages May 26 03:37:33 which is old packages May 26 03:39:16 pppoe is possible in default builds May 26 03:39:26 so no May 26 03:41:59 uhnmm no what ? May 26 03:42:10 in default builds you have a client May 26 03:42:18 not a server AFAIK May 26 03:42:22 Am I incorrect ? May 26 03:42:45 rp-pppoe is a client May 26 03:43:26 rp-pppoe can be a server too May 26 03:43:48 I am not discussing what rp-pppoe is May 26 03:44:23 I am asking whether or not the default ppp daemon in the default build is capable of being a concentrator (server) or not May 26 03:44:36 sorry if I was unclear at first May 26 03:44:55 not as it's configured by uci, at least May 26 03:45:21 because anyone with access to the server would opt not to use pppoe May 26 03:46:13 DonkeyHotei, I am not sure you have enough information to dismiss my question and second guess my use case May 26 03:46:21 but that is ok May 26 03:46:38 I think I found the answer to my question May 26 03:47:18 my comment was in reference to the probable reasoning behind the status quo, not to your use case May 26 03:49:00 personally, i can think of a very valid use case right off the top of my head May 26 03:57:14 build #264 of ar7 is complete: Failure [failed shell_17] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/ar7/builds/264 May 26 04:01:26 build #240 of mcs814x is complete: Failure [failed shell_17] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/mcs814x/builds/240 May 26 16:24:58 build #259 of at91 is complete: Success [build successful] Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/builders/at91/builds/259 **** ENDING LOGGING AT Fri May 27 02:59:58 2016