**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Wed Sep 11 03:00:21 2019 Sep 11 03:05:12 just guessing into the dark, but 64 byte u-boot header in front? Sep 11 04:10:02 pkgadd: uimage is 64 bytes Sep 11 05:06:56 Why are there the packages squashfs and squashfskit4 in tools/? Sep 11 05:16:21 aparcar[m]: I remember that netgear wndr3800 has its kernel in an old squashfs. Sep 11 05:17:47 Is it still? Sep 11 05:20:21 aparcar[m]: Its bootloader loads kernel from the old squashfs: https://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt/openwrt.git;a=blob;f=target/linux/ar71xx/image/generic.mk;h=30a8b3448342c917f7c60bf6b9a50dca3d2c6ff1;hb=HEAD#l34 Sep 11 06:31:00 Hey, what's the current release schedule for the next openwrt? (Disclamer: not complaining, just asking.) Sep 11 06:34:16 pkgadd: yeah, it's failing on the image_header_t ih_type check. it's looking for type 3 (RAMDisk Image) but finding type 4 (Multi-File Image). Sep 11 06:38:13 any recommendation for 4G/LTE openwrt supported routers/gateways? Sep 11 06:40:37 Apparently these are the ones to chose from - TP-Link Archer MR200 AC750 - TP-Link TL-MR6400 - D-Link DWR-921 - all 3 at 80 to 100 EURs ... but ... which one should I take? Sep 11 06:42:19 afaik effectively all LTE routers use a USB LTE modem internally, even if they dress it up on a mini-pcie or m.2 form factor (using only the USB lanes). which would widen your scope considerably Sep 11 06:45:34 Good to know thanks. Sep 11 06:46:05 Focussing on whether or not external antennas are supported Sep 11 06:48:02 LTE isn't exactly my area of expertise, barely use it (in my phone, and that's what I'd turn to in case of 'emergencies', with an ad hoc reconfiguration rather than planning ahead) Sep 11 06:57:56 it depends on whether you want to be onsite or not ;) Sep 11 07:07:00 * russell-- starts to catch on to ARTIFACTS := foo Sep 11 07:07:19 airwind: Some issues in LuCI according to mailing list Sep 11 07:08:01 jow ping Sep 11 07:16:12 Astoria Easybox 904 LTE is looking much better ... 2 cores and 128MB Ram. Sep 11 07:22:38 jow: root@OpenWrt:/# sysupgrade -T /tmp/openwrt-brcm47xx-mips74k-standard-squashfs.trx; echo $? Sep 11 07:22:40 Image metadata not found Sep 11 07:22:41 Found a valid TRX version 1 Sep 11 07:22:42 0 Sep 11 07:23:01 jow: do you have some specific use case that fails? Sep 11 07:49:43 GL.iNet GL-X750 would work too. hrmn. Sep 11 08:00:50 is there any dead gateway detection software/utility in openwrt that would adjust routing in case the primary dialup WAN is considered dead? Sep 11 08:16:32 reiffert: mwan3 could do that. Sep 11 09:26:34 i'm getting done with my sysupgrade improvements i think Sep 11 09:26:47 does anyone have any other ideas for extra improvements? Sep 11 09:27:17 Can someone look at https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/2368 ? Sep 11 09:28:18 afaik we kept samba36 due to size vs samba4 Sep 11 09:28:32 Pepe: please send also an e-mail of patch to openwrt-devel@ Sep 11 09:28:39 i think some may still use it Sep 11 09:28:48 and I think it may be easy to miss that pull request Sep 11 09:29:35 rmilecki: as mangix said it can not be send via email due to size limits Sep 11 09:29:46 Pepe: "git format-patch -D" Sep 11 09:30:15 removing samba36 might make some people unhappy, and last I tried samba4 did not compile Sep 11 09:37:21 ah I didn't see the cifsd alternative Sep 11 13:08:28 samba36 doesn't belong to the main tree :) and if it's needed, move it to the packages feed Sep 11 15:03:26 how can i turn tiny target into generic one (i swapped flash and ram to required sizes) ? Sep 11 19:53:49 stintel: I've been running cifsd for ~1 month now, pretty much since day 1 it landed in packages, without any problems whatsoever. cifsdteam seems a bit chaotic from the outset, but the product is pretty sweet. Sep 11 20:00:19 takimata: that's nice to hear. I don't use my OpenWrt devices as fileserver so I have no use for it, but I'm pretty sure this is a feature that is used by many Sep 11 20:01:56 stintel: the phrase gets thrown around a lot, but OpenWrt gave second life to my My Book Lives. I'm using them exclusively as SMB file servers with OpenWrt. Sep 11 20:04:28 they make for excellent little NAS boxen if you're not fixated on transfer speed, with samba36 they maxed out at ~25 MB/s, with cifsd that's now ~36 MB/s. that alone is noteworthy. Sep 11 20:04:43 wow, that's a big improvement Sep 11 20:05:18 I've got something beefier here, unfortunately only dual gigE Sep 11 20:05:43 what is "only" about that? Sep 11 20:06:07 * mamarley hands takimata a 10GbE card. :) Sep 11 20:06:25 well you can LACP the two links but you will never be able to reach more than 1 gigE on a single TCP stream as far as I understand Sep 11 20:06:43 and well, I can easily saturate 1 gigE link Sep 11 20:06:53 but going 10gigE is going to be expensive :P Sep 11 20:07:14 That's correct and also the hashing algorithm for LACP isn't perfect. Sometimes if you have multiple streams it will divide them between the links inefficiently. Sep 11 20:07:25 mamarley: I am doing it with ovswitch now Sep 11 20:07:27 pretty cool Sep 11 20:08:23 damnit, syslog broke on that box Sep 11 20:08:51 stintel: I only got an >100 mbit downlink in Japan, but that's ... Japan. every packet has to fart around the world twice from there. Sep 11 20:10:03 Sep 1 18:58:23 ministore ovs-vswitchd[5139]: ovs|02228|bond|INFO|bond bond0: shift 165730kB of load (with hash 17) from enp5s0 to enp4s0 (now carrying 42485kB and 174559kB load, respectively) Sep 11 20:10:03 Sep 1 18:58:23 ministore ovs-vswitchd[5139]: ovs|02229|bond|INFO|bond bond0: shift 8798kB of load (with hash 161) from enp4s0 to enp5s0 (now carrying 165761kB and 51283kB load, respectively) Sep 11 20:10:10 mamarley: ^ Sep 11 20:10:20 openvswitch shifts the load around Sep 11 20:11:06 My WAN speed certainly doesn't justify 10GbE alone either, but the same box is also a router-on-a-stick, file server, TV server, and probably something else I have forgotten too, so I decided to use it anyway just to avoid any bottlenecks Sep 11 20:11:06 stintel: Cool, that seems smarter than other LACP implementations I have seen. Sep 11 20:11:21 it's interesting to say the least :) Sep 11 20:11:43 should actually migrate my workstation to use the same config Sep 11 20:12:59 stintel: what's at the other side? seeing as normally you need both sides to agree on the hashing algorithm or interesting things occur.. Sep 11 20:21:59 EqUaTe: cisco sg300-10mp Sep 11 20:42:31 stintel: did you try multipath TCP? Sep 11 20:43:19 Hauke: haven't heard of that before Sep 11 20:44:28 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multipath_TCP Sep 11 20:44:35 MPTCP, while does not need specific support from "middle devices", is still L3 stuff, so I don't think it applies for switching bondings really Sep 11 20:44:40 I do not know if it is supported by OpenWrt Sep 11 20:46:12 some years ago was not, and I couldn't make heads and tails in order to include it for the very specfic project I was tasked for =) Sep 11 20:50:06 MTCP is supported by openwrt. it just let it through Sep 11 20:53:54 lynxis: well like said, mptcp does not require any support from devices in the middle, a computer with one connection going through openwrt router and other through separate lte dongle, and then other end on internets that also suports it, can utilise mptcp :) Sep 11 20:54:57 problem becomes if you need openwrt device itself to act as one end of mptcp connection (or well, it was problem years ago, haven't realy seen evidence thatbeing changed, while I certainly can't be 100% :) Sep 11 20:55:02 would be nice to support something like these DSL + LTE connections Sep 11 20:55:07 which often use MPTCP Sep 11 20:55:48 multiwan owrt certainly supports, tough that wasn't debated I guess =) Sep 11 20:56:02 ye Sep 11 20:56:03 yes Sep 11 20:56:13 mm, some ISP "oem" firmwares/devices can utilie something of sorts Sep 11 21:01:03 yes most of the DSL + LTE setups are using MPTCP **** ENDING LOGGING AT Thu Sep 12 03:02:41 2019