**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Sat Oct 12 02:59:57 2019
Oct 12 14:43:52 <ldir> ynezz: Sorry, really wasn't thinking/capable of thought the other day re: linux conf crashing on macos catalina.
Oct 12 14:45:26 <ldir> I *can* replicate the issue with ease on a native build (without hitting the ncurses lib dependency) eg 'make config' in a stable 5.3 will produce a sigsegv.
Oct 12 14:47:54 <ldir> I'm testing a workaround as I type.  It looks to be an xcode 11 bug..that's enabled by catalina.  There's clues here https://forums.developer.apple.com/thread/121887
Oct 12 15:54:50 <ldir> nbd: ynezz: workaround export MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=10.14
Oct 12 15:58:46 <ldir> I tried just using '-fno-stack-protector' but you have to do that in a couple of places... and I have doubts about all the host-compile tools
Oct 12 19:32:46 <aparcar[m]> jow:  would it be possible to run "make prepare" before "target/install"? from my understanding it should just generate buildinfo files. However it seem to trigger "Device/Build" from include/image.mk which clean up the json files
Oct 12 19:40:00 <ldir> aparcar[m]: I don't know anything/much about docker.  Is it possible to use one of the openwrt docker images as a build environment to create the toolchain?
Oct 12 19:43:35 <aparcar[m]> Yes sure. They contain debian
Oct 12 19:43:59 <aparcar[m]> ldir: why?
Oct 12 19:45:41 <ldir> because I have a couple of local patches that change cpu types for a target so the toolchain doesn't exist in the main tree.
Oct 12 19:46:37 <ldir> although I doubt the toolchain is *actually* any difference (it's just a mips target compiler) things get named differently.
Oct 12 19:47:13 <ldir> and I was looking at alternatives to building natively on mac but without going the whole VM route.
Oct 12 19:48:14 <aparcar[m]> https://hub.docker.com/r/openwrtorg/sdk should work fine, just clone in the repo
Oct 12 19:48:55 <ldir> so my ideal is to use my existing dev environment but use some 'magic command' to go and build what it finds in my local directory.
Oct 12 19:49:27 <ldir> so the sdk docker image is capable of building the sdk?
Oct 12 19:49:39 <aparcar[m]> ynezz: we could build daily containers containing compiled tools only, this could be usable for whatever interested dev and also used by the ci buildflow
Oct 12 19:50:19 <aparcar[m]> ldir: the sdk build packages. but it has all requirements installed to build the whole thing
Oct 12 19:50:43 <aparcar[m]> you can simply mount your current repro in it via volumes
Oct 12 19:50:53 <aparcar[m]> "$(pwd)"/bin/:/home/build/openwrt/
Oct 12 19:51:10 <ldir> ok, I'll give it a go :-)  Thank you
Oct 12 19:54:08 <aparcar[m]> you're welcome, let me know if it works
Oct 12 19:57:40 <ldir> will do - that'll be a tomorrow/next week project :-)
Oct 12 22:41:25 <Hauke> KanjiMonster: brcm63xx/smp does not build with GCC 8.3.0: http://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/images/builders/brcm63xx%2Fsmp/builds/110/steps/images/logs/stdio
Oct 13 00:15:13 <mangix> just saw the wikidevi thing. real unfortunate
Oct 13 00:18:24 * mangix just saw the difference between uClibc++ and libstdc++: 62KB vs. 360KB
Oct 13 00:18:27 <mangix> WOW
Oct 13 00:19:28 <mangix> wonder if there's a way to slim the latter
Oct 13 00:20:51 <mangix> the one in GCC5 is 227.7KB...
Oct 13 00:22:46 <mangix> 328.9KB for GCC7. Probably a result of all the new C++17 and C++20 stuff
**** ENDING LOGGING AT Sun Oct 13 02:59:57 2019