**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Tue Feb 18 02:59:57 2020
Feb 18 05:41:34 <russell--> fyi, i'm seeing /etc/uci-defaults/50-dnsmasq-migrate-resolv-conf-auto.sh left over after first flash
Feb 18 05:41:50 <russell--> not getting removed, as it presumably ought to
Feb 18 05:52:47 <russell--> needs an exit 0 at the bottom, looks like
Feb 18 06:17:49 <russell--> i sent a patch to the ml
Feb 18 08:48:35 <Hauke> jow: ping
Feb 18 09:09:30 <RobertP> @rmilecki ping
Feb 18 09:49:46 <jow> Hauke: pong
Feb 18 14:44:57 <indy> hi all, is signify generated key and signed packages file compatible with usign?
Feb 18 14:55:24 <jow> indy: yes
Feb 18 14:55:38 <jow> we use signify on the buildbots to sign the opkg repos
Feb 18 14:56:31 <indy> jow, thanks
Feb 18 14:56:53 <indy> is that in sdk containers already?
Feb 18 14:57:09 <jow> not sure what you mean
Feb 18 14:57:26 <indy> i mean that in debian is signify and signify-openbsd
Feb 18 14:57:31 <indy> package
Feb 18 14:57:46 <jow> you mean whether it is preinstalled?
Feb 18 14:57:50 <indy> yes
Feb 18 14:57:58 <jow> that I don't know, sorry
Feb 18 15:00:58 <indy> and which one is used?
Feb 18 15:05:20 <jow> indy: signify-openbsd
Feb 18 15:05:30 <jow> but I belive its just an alias for signify
Feb 18 15:05:33 <indy> jow, thanks
Feb 18 16:20:00 <stintel> swalker: could you supress the mailings for openzwave? the page you are scraping does not match with the versions they have on github and the only openzwave user I know of (domoticz) does not build with newer versions
Feb 18 16:28:09 <RobertP> rmilecki ping
Feb 18 17:24:09 <cotequeiroz> ping jow
Feb 18 17:49:23 <koniu> heyup, ive been seeing an annoying bug with ath9k-htc cards for a while- in sta mode iwinfo reports the interfaces hwaddr as the access point
Feb 18 17:50:20 <koniu> iwinfo, iw, ip l, wpa_cli outputs here: http://paste.debian.net/1131000/
Feb 18 17:50:39 <koniu> same on master and 19.07 branches
Feb 18 18:09:00 <RobertP> rmilecki: ping :)
Feb 18 18:53:36 <Hauke> jow: pong from yesterday morneing ;-)
Feb 18 19:06:53 <jow> Hauke: yeah... had a question about an iwinfo commit you merged
Feb 18 19:07:19 <jow> https://git.openwrt.org/?p=project/iwinfo.git;a=commitdiff;h=bf2c1069a7f14d1af1e02c8edd2b7338f0355ac8
Feb 18 19:07:57 <jow> it checks for chn.mode == -1
Feb 18 19:08:29 <jow> the only way I see it getting -1 is by interpreting the nla_get_u32() return value as signed integer, which seems to be done in nl80211_get_htmode_cb()
Feb 18 19:08:38 <jow> however I wonder if this is going to break on 64bit architectures?
Feb 18 19:09:20 <jow> struct chan_info should probably use int32_t
Feb 18 19:16:21 <jow> cotequeiroz: pong
Feb 18 19:17:28 <cotequeiroz> Did you see my message about an 'Argument list too long' error last night?
Feb 18 19:17:41 <jow> briefly, yes
Feb 18 19:19:10 <cotequeiroz> I'm still testing that patch, to make sure it did not mess things ups badly, but I do not like to create a temp file every time, when the old command works 99% of the time.
Feb 18 19:19:39 <Hauke> jow: I think this can never be -1
Feb 18 19:20:25 <Hauke> the code looks wrong to me too
Feb 18 19:23:15 <cotequeiroz> I could use $(if $(word 1000 $$(call opkg_package_files,$(1)*)), `use_file`, `call it straight).  I'm not 100% confident on my makefile programming skills.  Do you have any advice?
Feb 18 19:24:22 <Hauke> jow: NL80211_ATTR_BSS_HT_OPMODE is never set in the kernel
Feb 18 19:25:03 <Hauke> and NL80211_ATTR_CHANNEL_WIDTH is sometimes u8 and sometimes u32 looks like a bug
Feb 18 19:37:00 <blogic> Hauke: details ?
Feb 18 19:37:08 <blogic> was looking at that code today
Feb 18 19:44:22 <koniu> hey if yous looking at iwinfo look at this too pls - https://bugs.openwrt.org/index.php?do=details&task_id=2845 - should be an easy kill ;)
Feb 18 19:51:12 <Hauke> blogic: I did a git grep for NL80211_ATTR_CHANNEL_WIDTH in 5.6-rc2 and it once use nla_put_u32 and in a differnt place nla_put_u8 the policy says u32
Feb 19 00:03:11 <swalker> stintel: the Makefile is pointing to the same place for the tarballs as the watch file is scraping?
Feb 19 01:34:50 <am0rphis> how to build image for archer-a6 v2 (RU)?
Feb 19 01:36:02 <pkgadd> no real difference to building for any other device, I guess
Feb 19 01:38:50 <am0rphis> cant select it from menuconfig, trying to build some generic models but it not work for me
Feb 19 01:39:39 <pkgadd> it's part of ath79, not ar71xx
Feb 19 01:40:39 <am0rphis> yep
Feb 19 02:06:57 <am0rphis> should i use "TP-Link Archer A6 v2 (US/TW) (TP-Link Archer C6 v2 (US)" or "TP-Link Archer C6 v2 (EU/RU/JP)" for my Archer A6 (RU)?
Feb 19 02:35:35 <slh64> c6 is not a6, you need the one for your device
Feb 19 02:37:20 <am0rphis> slh64, i can't find my device in list
**** ENDING LOGGING AT Wed Feb 19 02:59:57 2020