**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Mon Oct 19 02:59:57 2020 Oct 19 06:32:14 stintel: is it even a supported target? Oct 19 08:00:32 damex: mvebu ... Oct 19 08:00:41 stintel: well, how about board? Oct 19 08:00:58 no, I'm working on it Oct 19 08:01:07 that's why I'm asking if there were any similar cases Oct 19 08:01:14 to check how it was solved there Oct 19 08:08:33 at some point, i stumbled across a description of the mediatek (e.g. mt7628an) factory partition format ... can't find it now **** BEGIN LOGGING AT Mon Oct 19 02:54:02 2020 **** ENDING LOGGING AT Mon Oct 19 02:59:57 2020 **** BEGIN LOGGING AT Mon Oct 19 02:59:57 2020 Oct 19 03:01:20 hello, does anyone know if any work is being done on the IPQ6000/IPQ6010 SoC from Qualcomm? Oct 19 03:01:38 or any other Wi-fi 6 capable SoC? Oct 19 03:02:57 eduardas: the QCA stuff wont be in owrt in a usable manner for a year or two Oct 19 03:03:13 eduardas: the mediatek stuff is nice and upstream but still pending mass market HW Oct 19 03:08:06 blogic: good to know, thank you Oct 19 03:08:41 eduardas: so basically 3-6 monhs from now people will be using mt7622/mt7915 Oct 19 03:13:16 blogic: I'd be happy with just the mini-PCIe MT7915 cards. Hopefully the Omnia still has enough oomph to drive them… :) Oct 19 03:13:38 blogic: is there a difference in level of mainline Linux support for Qualcomm or Mediatek stuff (in general)? Is one vendor better than the other when it comes to interfacing with FOSS community projects? Oct 19 03:14:03 eduardas: yes Oct 19 03:14:10 MTK has upstream support Oct 19 03:14:13 QCA does not Oct 19 03:15:09 blogic: Mediatek contribute mainline support themselves or is it 3rd party? Oct 19 03:15:38 they actively interact witht he upstream community Oct 19 03:16:34 blogic: I expect that the SoC docs are still under NDA? Oct 19 03:17:17 eduardas: some are actually opened up Oct 19 03:18:09 blogic: really? did not expect that? you don't happen to know which ones specifically? **** ENDING LOGGING AT Mon Oct 19 04:25:06 2020