**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Wed Feb 03 02:59:57 2021
Feb 03 05:06:25 <Grommish> I wonder if could get OpenWrt to run NES emulation..
Feb 03 05:06:41 <Grommish> There are actual MIPS emulators out there for some reason
Feb 03 05:19:48 >KGB-1< https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/openwrt/openwrt_omap.html has been updated. (0% images and 98.2% packages reproducible in our current test framework.)
Feb 03 07:58:15 <nbd> Hauke: yes, a bisect would be useful. i'm using mt76x2 and mt7603 on my main router at the moment and see no such issues
Feb 03 07:58:24 <nbd> though not with an iwlwifi client
Feb 03 08:21:49 <rsalvaterra1> nbd: my MT7615 survived overnight, I can still access the laptop. I believe the broadcast issue is indeed fixed. :)
Feb 03 08:21:56 <nbd> cool
Feb 03 08:22:08 <rsalvaterra1> Thanks a lot!
Feb 03 08:22:19 <nbd> thank you for testing and reporting issues
Feb 03 08:22:38 <rsalvaterra1> My pleasure! ;)
Feb 03 08:26:27 * enyc meows at  https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-developer/releases/goals/21.xx
Feb 03 08:27:13 <enyc> nbd: heh i've been testing master on my  lantiq xrx200 BH-HHv5a ...  and now i put on debug logs, both network and serial-console....  Doesn't go wrong!
Feb 03 08:30:05 <enyc> nbd: I guess I probably could/should update to current master soon... at least 3 weeks outdated or so i suspect now
Feb 03 08:30:38 <enyc> (there was some problem with self-rebooting on earlier master...)
Feb 03 11:30:47 <rsalvaterra> nbd: … and it's dead again. Rats. I changed the laptop's encryption to WPA3 this morning, could it be related…? :/
Feb 03 11:32:31 <nbd> not sure. maybe i need to run some tests with rekey
Feb 03 11:59:49 <rsalvaterra> nbd: what's weird is that, from the router itself, I can ping the laptop. Just not from another (only tested wired) device.
Feb 03 12:00:10 <nbd> because of issues with broadcast packets
Feb 03 12:00:17 <nbd> the router will have the laptop's address in the arp cache
Feb 03 12:00:21 <nbd> the other wired device not
Feb 03 12:01:29 <rsalvaterra> Right…
Feb 03 12:08:53 <lechner> Hauke: thanks for the wolfssl update. I very much liked the information you and others offered here. Maybe we can work together to improve the process for all of its maintainers in the future
Feb 03 12:11:02 <ynezz> lechner: we thank you, that you've notified us, btw do you know what platform was used for the coordination of this issue?
Feb 03 12:13:27 <ynezz> lechner: I mean, it was found and fixed in 10/2020, that CVE leaked "accidentaly" on 6.1. and the oss-fuzz 90 day embargo ended on 19.1.
Feb 03 12:14:39 <ynezz> lechner: I assume, that Debian had access to this information since 10/2020 via some vulnerability information/coordination platform and I'm wondering what was that
Feb 03 12:16:21 <Borromini> ynezz: could you post the 2021-02-02-1 PPP advisory on the forum as well? Or am I overlooking it?
Feb 03 12:16:38 <Borromini> (and thank you for the work btw)
Feb 03 12:16:44 <ynezz> lechner: we're likely going to ship wolfssl by default in the next stable release so I assume, that we would need to apply for an account on such platform as an organization
Feb 03 12:17:17 <ynezz> Borromini: https://forum.openwrt.org/t/security-advisory-2021-02-02-2-wolfssl-heap-buffer-overflow-in-rsapad-pss-cve-2020-36177
Feb 03 12:17:28 <Borromini> ynezz: thats the wolfssl one, but not the ppp one
Feb 03 12:17:45 <ynezz> Borromini: ah, we're waiting for the CVE...
Feb 03 12:17:49 <Borromini> ah :)
Feb 03 12:18:17 <ynezz> I don't want to downplay it, but it's not severe, so we can wait little bit more
Feb 03 12:19:02 <Borromini> ok, understand
Feb 03 12:19:12 * Borromini sees CVEs and gets twitchy
Feb 03 17:06:18 <Tapper> Hi people Pople on the forums are saying that upnp is broken. https://forum.openwrt.org/t/upnp-port-forwarding-not-working-for-windows-10-and-xbox-one/87562/2
Feb 03 17:06:45 <Borromini> it's called 'plug and pray' for something amirite.
Feb 03 17:06:53 <Tapper> lol
Feb 03 17:07:32 <Tapper> The latest upnp is said to be mutch safer then the old one.
Feb 03 17:23:47 <Borromini> ;)
Feb 03 17:23:52 <Borromini> i ain't buying that
Feb 03 17:38:18 <lechner> ynezz: you researched the issue more thoroughly than I, perhaps because openwrt uses wolfssl widely and is thus more affected. Plus, upgrades are *much* harder for your users. I have known the wolfssl folks for a long time (including as friends) and am making plans to ensure that their open-source users receive the same level of attention as paying customers. (Debian did not hear until Jan 7,
Feb 03 17:38:24 <lechner> although they would have told me if they had thought of it!)  i'll be back with better information for you in the near future, if that's okay with you.
Feb 03 17:41:16 <lechner> for anyone listening in, i'd like to add that i think wolfssl is a spectacular product. it is fast and tiny, and especially suited for environments such as yours
Feb 03 19:10:59 <owrt-snap-builds> build #760 of layerscape/armv8_64b is complete: Failure [failed images]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/images/builders/layerscape%2Farmv8_64b/builds/760  blamelist: Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>
Feb 03 19:16:58 <stintel> Tapper: I responded to the upnp forum post, I've been debugging that not so long ago
Feb 03 19:32:49 <owrt-snap-builds> build #742 of mediatek/mt7622 is complete: Failure [failed pkgbuild]  Build details are at http://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/images/builders/mediatek%2Fmt7622/builds/742  blamelist: Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>
Feb 03 19:33:16 <Tapper> stintel Thanks. Do you think it will be fixt?
Feb 03 19:33:49 <Tapper> I have just added all the rules to my firewall by hand.
Feb 03 20:52:51 <ynezz> lechner: yeah, thanks!
Feb 03 21:04:05 <Borromini> anyone know what baptiste jonglez' nick is?
Feb 03 21:04:37 <Borromini> zorun: ping. are you baptiste?
Feb 03 21:04:56 <Borromini> https://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt/openwrt.git;a=commit;h=50e3659703113df036e755e0d483172c3b809242 < a question about this commit. Is your DM200 a DM200-100EUR?
Feb 03 21:14:41 <zorun> Borromini: yep
Feb 03 21:14:48 <zorun> (for the first question)
Feb 03 21:15:10 <Borromini> hi!
Feb 03 21:15:12 <Borromini> ok :)
Feb 03 21:15:15 <zorun> woah I haven't touched these devices for a long time
Feb 03 21:15:16 <Borromini> and the second? :D
Feb 03 21:15:24 <Borromini> there's someone in #openwrt
Feb 03 21:15:28 <Borromini> Arrel124
Feb 03 21:15:40 <Borromini> he has one but the openwrt wiki only talks about the DM200-100AUS
Feb 03 21:15:43 <zorun> I think it was the EUR version yes, the alternative being the AUS version
Feb 03 21:16:02 <Borromini> ok, thanks
Feb 03 21:16:18 <ldir-> Let me guess, one of them is upside down
Feb 03 21:16:30 <Borromini> ;)
Feb 03 21:16:32 <zorun> ahah :)
Feb 03 21:16:53 <Borromini> topsy turvy
Feb 03 21:17:36 <Borromini> zorun: you're in france i presume (going by your name)
Feb 03 21:17:49 <Borromini> so a -100EUR wouldn't be too wild a deduction would it? :)
Feb 03 21:19:34 <zorun> Borromini: exactly
Feb 03 21:19:38 <Borromini> =)
Feb 03 21:19:42 <Borromini> merci bien
Feb 03 21:19:45 * Borromini tips his hat
Feb 03 21:20:01 <zorun> Borromini: actually, it was sold just as "DM200", but let me check if I still have one
Feb 03 21:20:06 <zorun> c'est un plaisir
Feb 03 21:20:17 <Borromini> alright thanks
Feb 03 21:21:57 <zorun> ;)
Feb 03 21:22:01 <zorun> it's just "DM200" on the case
Feb 03 21:22:14 <zorun> maybe they introduced the variants at a later date
Feb 03 21:22:32 <zorun> but probably they just ship with a different DSL firmware
Feb 03 21:24:50 <Borromini> ok, thanks for double checking
Feb 03 21:30:01 <zorun> I have updated the wiki to clarify
Feb 03 21:30:40 <Borromini> cool!
Feb 03 22:01:45 <Hauke> nbd: ok, I will try to find out where this problem was introduced, but this will probably take some days
Feb 03 22:04:13 <Hauke> ynezz: thanks for creating the wolfssl advisory
Feb 03 22:04:59 <mangix> ynezz: when will a new release be cut? I want to get ksmbd backported to 19.07
Feb 03 22:06:01 <Hauke> lechner: thanks for informing us about the problem in wolfssl, I just assumed this was a minor problem like the normal 4 to 10 CVEs a SSL lib has each year ;-)
Feb 03 22:06:48 <Hauke> mangix: we are stil waiting for a CVE numebr for https://openwrt.org/advisory/2021-02-02-1
Feb 03 22:07:05 <Hauke> I would plan it in about 1 week
Feb 03 22:09:57 <lechner> Hauke: yeah, i had the same reaction (and learned more about the NVD scale in the process)  thanks again for the quick fix.  you will be in the loop going forward
Feb 03 22:10:53 <Hauke> lechner: thanks
Feb 03 22:12:13 <mangix> Hauke: I'll set up some PRs in the packages feed. They need to be pushed right before the release
Feb 03 22:31:13 <Grommish> '
Feb 03 22:32:24 <Hauke> mangix: why do you have to push them right before the release?
Feb 03 22:32:31 <Grommish> Tapper: I just installed UPNP and it works, but I don't know that I've ever seen anything in the LuCI UPNP Service page as to the mapping.  But I'm DMZ from the edge to the device and UPNP the interior device, and my XB1 shows Open NAT
Feb 03 22:32:34 <mangix> Hauke: it's a kernel module
Feb 03 22:32:44 <mangix> I can't backport that
Feb 03 22:33:25 <mangix> https://github.com/openwrt/packages/pull/12502
Feb 03 22:38:21 <Hauke> mangix: ah ok, now I understand the problem
Feb 03 22:39:01 <Hauke> The user space util would be delivered independed of the openwrt minor version, but the kmod is only updated with a new openwrt minor version
Feb 03 22:39:16 <mangix> yes
Feb 03 22:39:42 <mangix> I assume the only way to do so is to coordinate a backport and release
Feb 03 22:40:43 <mangix> note: the reason for backporting it is because the version currently in 19.07 is somewhat broken
Feb 03 22:50:39 <Tapper> Grommish thanks for testing. It's probs better that I don't be a lazy shit and put the rules in my firewall anyway. I here a lot of people have the same thing with there xbox and openwrt using upnp
Feb 03 22:51:27 <Grommish> Tapper: Yeah, UPNP I generally do not like..  I do not like things opening up ports without my knowledge, but in this case, It's an isolated segment that i use for streaming and XB1 only so I didn
Feb 03 22:51:46 <Grommish> err didnt mind.. But it does work as of 2 days ago when I ran the nightly snapshot
Feb 03 22:51:57 <Grommish> and updated via the opkg repos
Feb 03 22:51:57 * Tapper nods.
Feb 03 22:52:01 <Tapper> thanks
Feb 03 22:55:58 <Tapper> Does any one know if the wiki is open for new accounts?
Feb 03 22:56:50 <Tapper> There is a user on twitter asking about there being know page for the tp-link A6
Feb 03 22:57:50 <Grommish> I contact Tmomas about my access on the Forum via DM
Feb 03 22:57:55 <Grommish> err contactged
Feb 03 22:58:00 <Tapper> k
Feb 03 23:11:24 <Hauke> hostapd got a security update: https://w1.fi/security/2020-2/
Feb 03 23:11:48 <Hauke> just registered at oss-security@lists.openwall.com some hours ago and the first mail is more or less relevant ;-)
Feb 03 23:14:06 <Grommish> My state is offering CompTIA Network+ and Security+ exam courses for free and providing a voucher for the test.. i signed up thinking what the hell
Feb 03 23:19:09 <hexa-> - Update to wpa_supplicant v2.10 or newer, once available
Feb 03 23:19:12 <hexa-> this one takes the cake :)
Feb 03 23:25:53 <Hauke> hexa-: the security advisory from June 2020 said the same ;-)
Feb 03 23:26:00 <hexa-> lol :)
Feb 03 23:31:34 <hurricos> What does a `mode 'mesh'` wifi-iface with `mesh_fwding '0'` provide over IBSS?
Feb 03 23:32:26 <hurricos> I can only think of default-firmware ath10k compatibility off the top of my head
Feb 03 23:35:42 <Namidairo> i wonder how many vendors have config_p2p enabled
Feb 03 23:36:19 <Hauke> android
Feb 03 23:36:36 <Hauke> at least on some devices where they use hostapd
Feb 03 23:37:51 <Hauke> it is listed here: https://source.android.com/security/bulletin/2021-02-01
Feb 03 23:44:17 <Namidairo> oh duh it's wifi direct it wouldn't be turned on the AP
Feb 03 23:44:29 <Namidairo> ...I think
Feb 03 23:45:03 <mangix> hahaha :(
Feb 03 23:45:40 <mangix> arc-openwrt-linux-gnu-gcc: error: ./.libs/libpcre.so: No such file or directory
Feb 03 23:45:40 <mangix> arc-openwrt-linux-gnu-gcc: error: ./.libs/libpcreposix.so: No such file or directory
Feb 03 23:45:47 <mangix> FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU autotools
Feb 04 00:02:08 <Hauke> mangix: I would not invest much time into arc
Feb 04 01:15:32 <mangix> Hauke: it's not just arc. My normal musl builds are failing now too
Feb 04 02:51:03 <hurricos> I built OpenWrt on master with this diffconfig: https://paste.c-net.org/BargingSaving -- and now attempting to install the built .ipk's gives me:
Feb 04 02:51:08 <hurricos> * pkg_hash_fetch_best_installation_candidate: Packages for kmod-batman-adv found, but incompatible with the architectures configured.
Feb 04 02:51:56 <hurricos> The current system was compiled in the same run as this .ipk. How exactly are they incompatible?
Feb 04 03:02:22 <hurricos> Also, somewhat strangely, uname -a seems to suggest that I didn't build the kernel in the resulting initramfs/sysupgrade.
**** ENDING LOGGING AT Thu Feb 04 03:02:57 2021