**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Thu Apr 15 02:59:56 2021
Apr 15 17:58:14 >KGB-0< https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/openwrt/openwrt_lantiq.html has been updated. (98.2% images and 99.1% packages reproducible in our current test framework.)
Apr 15 18:41:40 <xdarklight> mkresin: out of curiosity - are you xRX200 networking performance testing results based on Linux 5.4 or 5.10? I am seeing slower iperf speeds with 5.10 (on 5.4 I got similar iperf numbers with DSA as you reported, but with 5.10 the numbers are ~20% lower)
Apr 15 18:42:16 <xdarklight> (without any flow offloading and without any burst size changes)
Apr 15 18:44:01 <mkresin> xdarklight: the results are with k5.4
Apr 15 18:44:50 <xdarklight> mkresin: I'd be interested if you're also seeing this 20% performance drop with Linux 5.10
Apr 15 18:44:59 <xdarklight> (no need to rush any testing though)
Apr 15 18:46:31 <mkresin> testing 5.10 might take some time. I'm about the check whats wrong with the deu driver
Apr 15 20:57:23 <philipp64> what's everyone's favorite MacOS TFTP server for unlocking routers?
Apr 15 21:47:03 <ldir> philipp64: I've used https://www.macupdate.com/app/mac/11116/tftpserver  to aid configuring the built-in service
Apr 15 22:19:57 <aparcar[m]> can we please pay someone to update the procd docs?
Apr 15 22:21:21 <stintel> +1
Apr 15 22:47:56 <guidosarducci> +2
Apr 15 22:50:57 <guidosarducci> BTW, who are the people most caring about gemini/layerscape/oxnas targets? I'm trying to PR and backport a kernel config fix: https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/4068, and wondering who else to ping.
Apr 15 22:51:29 <stintel> guidosarducci: git log should tell you
Apr 15 22:52:30 <guidosarducci> stintel: I always do that anyway... no bites however.
Apr 15 22:54:37 <stintel> guidosarducci: git shortlog --numbered --summary  target/linux/layerscape/
Apr 15 23:01:15 <guidosarducci> stintel: that's a nice summry. I've been reviewing logs and cherry-picking who to mention based on the nature and depth of their commits, not purely volume. I already have 6 GH contributors mentioned and wanted to avoid "spraying", but I suppose a few more is OK. Thanks.
Apr 15 23:02:14 <stintel> guidosarducci: I hope you'll get a response soon :)
Apr 15 23:03:25 <guidosarducci> Tx
Apr 15 23:33:05 <guidosarducci> ldir: just saw Simon's last comment re: dnsmasq OOM, and looks like no follow up on my analysis and solution, maybe because of the April 1 "noise". I'm putting together a test program and logs to demonstrate.
Apr 16 00:51:07 <guidosarducci> ldir: my dnsmasq demo code and logs are here: https://github.com/guidosarducci/dnsmasq/commit/5d4b81e49cd3d2e570fb6da85af9a3c2d8d2c9d2
**** ENDING LOGGING AT Fri Apr 16 03:00:29 2021