**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Tue Nov 29 02:59:57 2011 Nov 29 05:16:26 micahg: yes, remoting still needs vpx Nov 29 05:19:50 suihkulokki: right, but there's an internal libvpx that chromium builds, is there a guide for me to set up a cross-compile env to test this with? Nov 29 05:20:05 * micahg would love to be able to fix armel on amd64 Nov 29 05:41:09 micahg: for whatever reason the internal vpx is not happy to build on armel Nov 29 05:42:10 suihkulokki: ok, I'll try to fix that then, I'd prefer to use internal libvpx since chromium's minimum version will change through the stable release Nov 29 10:18:17 hi, I’m a bit concerned about the armel build of mksh and would be grateful if one of you running precise could: Nov 29 10:18:17 install mksh_40.3-1_armel; cd /tmp; cp /usr/share/doc/mksh/check.* .; gzip -d check.t; gzip -d check.pl; perl check.pl -s check.t -p /bin/mksh-static -v -C smksh,binsh,convfds,no-histfile 2>&1 | tee log Nov 29 10:58:31 * ogra_ finds it worth to put armhf in the topic Nov 29 12:39:31 hi, rootstock is deprecated right? Nov 29 12:39:40 SidH_: yes Nov 29 12:40:06 you can still use it, but we're not planning on fixing the issues on it anymore Nov 29 12:40:11 live-build should be used instead Nov 29 12:40:35 Can I add a note to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ARM/RootfsFromScratch about the deprecation Nov 29 12:40:42 but I still need to blog about properly enabling live-build to replace rootstock Nov 29 12:40:43 Similar to the Rootstock page itself? Nov 29 12:40:50 Ah. Nov 29 12:41:05 I tried the -core image on my DaVinci board today Nov 29 12:41:34 SidH_: yeah, we'd need to update this wiki with the instructions to use live-build instead Nov 29 12:41:35 SidH_, once rsalveti's blog post is out i'll kill the upstream project and ask for package removal from the archive Nov 29 12:41:46 Thanks! Nov 29 12:41:52 yeah, planning to make it available this week Nov 29 12:41:59 no hurry :) Nov 29 12:42:01 now that we're off the release week madness Nov 29 12:42:16 ogra_: and how is alpha 1 going? Nov 29 12:42:25 I'm basically trying out ubuntu-arm on my board and wanted to follow the existing instructions Nov 29 12:42:33 ogra_: tested the kernel for omap 3 here yesterday and it's working fine with the config change Nov 29 12:42:41 not to bad, the omap3 fix made it in ... i havent tested ac100 yet, panda should be fine Nov 29 12:42:58 ogra_: cool Nov 29 12:43:23 * ogra_ hasnt heard anything bad from GrueMaster either Nov 29 15:43:17 NCommander: help on the packaging side for xbmc should be useful, for sure :-) Nov 29 15:43:40 NCommander: one thing aviksil is looking at is trying to integrate the gstreamer patches Nov 29 15:44:00 rsalveti: well landing them into the Ubuntu packaging isn't that hard,then its just a matter of making a seed materialize Nov 29 15:44:01 then we can properly use the hw decode support at panda Nov 29 16:31:56 ogra_: Haven't done any recent testing as I have been fully engaged in getting the qrt kernel tests running for SRU testing. Nov 29 16:32:12 yeah, i thought so Nov 29 16:32:24 well, shouldn be all solved on omap3 now Nov 29 16:32:48 I do plan on testing some current images today (barring interrupts). Nov 29 16:33:03 * ogra_ stops interupting immediately Nov 29 16:34:35 heh Nov 29 17:07:32 NCommander, ogra_: could somebody look at the ruby1.9.1 test failure on armel? Nov 29 21:56:30 NCommander: you see this -> http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/2011-November/018995.html Nov 29 22:05:38 robbiew: that's drool worthy Nov 29 22:05:46 robbiew: even thoughour support for Xenis 'shakey' at best Nov 29 22:06:28 yeah Nov 29 22:15:29 I'd love to know how they got A15 hardware though ... Nov 29 22:16:45 NCommander: it was vexpress, I assume entirely emulated? Nov 29 22:17:01 infinity: yep Nov 29 22:17:04 NCommander: Though they gave kudos to ARM, so maybe they actually have a real vexpress A15 sitting on their desks. Nov 29 22:18:53 "...the port is already capable of booting a Linux 3.0 based virtual machine (dom0) up to a shell prompt on an ARM Architecture Envelope Model, configured to emulate an A15-based Versatile Express.", so looks like it's all emulated Nov 29 22:19:08 * infinity nods. Nov 29 22:19:25 Oh, d'oh Nov 29 22:19:33 Sounds almost like a xilinx gpgpu emulating an a15. Nov 29 22:45:55 Hi, what is the difference between arm-linux-gnuabi and arm-unknown-linux-gnuabi targets? Nov 29 22:49:46 jjardon: (Both of those are missing an "e") Nov 29 22:50:03 jjardon: And nothing. The -unknown- is a vendor string, and Debian/Ubuntu don't set it. Nov 29 22:50:18 jjardon: RedHat sets it to -redhat-, for instance. Nov 29 22:51:19 infinity: yeah, you are rigth. I asked because my arm board shows arm-linux-gnuabi and my cross-compiler gcc arm-unknown-linux-gnuabi Nov 29 22:51:35 gnueabi, surely. Nov 29 22:53:16 Anyhow, arm-linux-gnueabi == arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi == arm-*-linux-gnueabi (the latter being how it's often represented in autotools and such) Nov 29 22:56:09 infinity: ok, thanks! Nov 30 01:32:58 GrueMaster: any luck with that image/ Nov 30 01:33:37 Haven't rechecked. Just automating core image tests for all 3 arches. Running it now through jenkins. Nov 30 01:34:07 Ok, it was waiting for me to nudge it past restricted. Nov 30 01:34:10 running now. Nov 30 01:34:15 fail. Nov 30 01:35:19 Jan 1 02:25:00 base-installer: info: could not determine kernel flavour Nov 30 01:38:30 This is telling: Jan 1 01:58:17 base-installer: warning: Unknown armel subarchitecture 'omap4'. **** ENDING LOGGING AT Wed Nov 30 02:59:57 2011