**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Fri Jan 20 02:59:57 2012 Jan 20 09:26:38 hiiii Jan 20 10:01:47 rbasak, I got openmpi from experimental building. Jan 20 10:06:21 janimo, awesome, thank you! Jan 20 10:06:30 rbasak, sending you the debdiff Jan 20 10:06:42 it needs more thought on the packaging side Jan 20 10:08:46 rbasak, sent. Jan 20 10:08:55 * rbasak looks Jan 20 10:22:34 janimo, if you're still there: looks good, thanks for getting to the bottom of it! Debian experimental is FTBFS as well, how do you feel about sending this to debbugs? Jan 20 10:22:49 janimo: then maybe we could keep the delta small? Jan 20 12:26:57 ppisati: I uploaded a fix for Bug #917264 Jan 20 12:26:58 Launchpad bug 917264 in linux-ti-omap4 "HDMI resolutions are not detected on Pandaboard A4 (Omap 4430 ES2.3 silicon)" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/917264 Jan 20 12:27:21 It applies exclusively to Oneiric, but I am not sure how to specify that on the bug report? Jan 20 12:29:12 sebjan: you nominate it just for the Oneiric series Jan 20 12:29:19 sebjan: i'll do that Jan 20 12:31:08 ppisati: I just can't find the option for that :) where is it? Jan 20 12:32:32 sebjan: i did it for you, but the next time just press the "Nominate for series" link Jan 20 12:32:47 and from there choose to which series this bug apply Jan 20 12:39:00 sebjan: btw, you marked it as "fix ommitted", where did you send/apply it? Jan 20 12:39:35 ppisati: I can't find this option on the bug page... Jan 20 12:39:36 sebjan: i mean, is it for the ubuntu oneiric/ti-omap4 branch? and if yes, do you plan to send it to the kernel mailing? or do you want me to apply it? Jan 20 12:39:44 sebjan: wait Jan 20 12:40:02 ppisati: I attached the patch to the bug description, is this enough for fix commited? Jan 20 12:40:50 (and it was tested on top of 1206.15 on a Panda A4 board) Jan 20 12:41:40 ppisati: it is for ti-omap4 branch only and yes, it's for applying it to this branch only Jan 20 12:43:18 sebjan: http://people.canonical.com/~ppisati/sebjan-promote.png Jan 20 12:44:30 ppisati: I don't have this link :'(. I must be missing some privileges? Jan 20 12:44:48 sebjan: ah, good question... Jan 20 12:56:55 sebjan: do you know if this patch is also applied at the linaro tilt tree? Jan 20 12:57:14 I wonder if we should also ask agreen to apply it at his 3.1 branch Jan 20 12:57:58 rsalveti: it is not, I just recently pushed it to my tree. And yes, it shall go to Andy's tree. I'll email him right now (I have some other updates for him) Jan 20 12:58:42 sebjan: great, can you also add me at cc? I want to make sure these fixes are included at our 12.01 release that will be out next week Jan 20 12:58:55 rsalveti: sure! Jan 20 12:59:00 sebjan: thanks! Jan 20 12:59:12 ndec: are we having the call today? Jan 20 12:59:55 * ogra_ thinks we do Jan 20 12:59:56 yes Jan 20 13:00:19 * ndec wonders if i forgot to setup the conference call number... Jan 20 13:00:28 great, joining Jan 20 13:00:31 there was a new passcode in my mail Jan 20 13:00:52 looks like it's working. Jan 20 13:01:41 can't find the new passcode, can anyone post it to in pvt? thanks Jan 20 13:03:04 ppisati, posted in the other channel Jan 20 16:28:45 yo Jan 20 21:08:29 what is the best way to get sources for a particular program on ubuntu-arm (in my case ifdown) Jan 20 21:09:30 I get an error message with ifdown on this line in /etc/network/intefaces (server 11.10 on omap4, same line works on server 11.10 x86): Jan 20 21:09:31 iface default via 192.168.123.1 dev eth0 proto static Jan 20 21:09:37 too many parameters Jan 20 21:12:41 eFfeM: Err, that works on x86? Really? Jan 20 21:12:54 yes Jan 20 21:13:18 eFfeM: But "default via 192.168.123.1 dev eth0 proto static" is iproute output. Jan 20 21:13:29 Like, what you'd see from "ip ro show | grep default" Jan 20 21:13:42 It looks nothing like an interfaces(5) stanza. Jan 20 21:14:02 infinity: you are right, tried ifdown on the x86 box and it is indeed not recognized Jan 20 21:14:34 trying to migrate some sw from x86 to omap and ran into this Jan 20 21:14:49 I assure you that ifupdown on arm and x86 are identical. :) Jan 20 21:14:58 So, yes, as you've noted, that's an illegal stanza for both. Jan 20 21:15:26 infinity: they are not really identical: Jan 20 21:15:39 The sources are. Jan 20 21:15:46 x86: /sbin/ifdown: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.15, stripped Jan 20 21:15:50 arm: /sbin/ifdown: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, ARM, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.16, stripped Jan 20 21:15:52 But sure, anything compiled can be different if the toolchain breaks it. :P Jan 20 21:16:15 2.6.15 vs 1.6.16 might be different src Jan 20 21:16:31 No... Jan 20 21:16:33 but guess I need to work on the interfaces file Jan 20 21:16:35 Just different toolchains. Jan 20 21:16:42 dpkg -l ifupdown Jan 20 21:16:47 You should have the same version on both. Jan 20 21:17:35 jcrigby: I haven't had a chance to play with your mx5 kernels yet. Have you booted either of them yourself? Jan 20 21:17:50 infinity: yeup, boht are 0.7-alpha5 Jan 20 21:45:44 infinity: the bug was indeed in the code I was trying to port. fixed it. Thanks for your info as that pushed me into the right direction! Jan 20 22:10:48 Hi, does anyone know of a howto in installing ubuntu arm on a Pogopug (Sheevaplug/Dockstar NAS device) via usb? Jan 20 22:13:56 kkerwin: Is the device armv7? I don't think they are. Jan 20 22:16:30 kkerwin: these are armv5 devices I think the latest ubuntu version supported is 9.04 or so Jan 20 22:16:43 Ok. Jan 20 22:17:04 so either use the latest version of ubuntu that supports armv5 or use debian as that is still supports armv5 Jan 20 22:17:19 Do I have to build packages on a separate computer, or are their pre-built packages for most things (file servers, etc). Jan 20 22:17:23 kkerwin: which device exactly? Jan 20 22:17:31 PogoplugV2 Jan 20 22:17:50 s/their/there/ Jan 20 22:18:01 dropbear on arm gives me: /scripts/init-premount/dropbear: line 32: ipconfig: not found Jan 20 22:18:11 grep tells this lives in /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/functions Jan 20 22:18:29 functions: ipconfig -t ${ROUNDTTT} "${DEVICE}" Jan 20 22:18:39 how do I get to ipconfig in a linux shell script ??? Jan 20 22:20:09 kkerwin: https://wiki.xkyle.com/PogoplugV2 Jan 20 22:20:21 `ifconfig -a` ? Jan 20 22:20:50 k1l: Oh thank you. Google hasn't been very helpful. Thanks so much. Jan 20 22:20:53 I'll brb. Jan 20 22:24:37 nevdull: ipconfig is in this script, not in my code Jan 20 22:29:03 kkerwin: The PogoplugV2 is ARMv5te. We only support armv7. Sorry. Jan 20 22:36:09 GrueMaster: No worries. Would you recommend that I use Debian for the long run, or is ARMv5 support improving? Jan 20 22:37:40 kkerwin: ubuntu decided to stop supporting v5 Jan 20 22:38:11 Armv5 support is not on the the table for Ubuntu. We simply do not have the manpower/resources to maintain & validate it. It is a very hard strain right now supporting armel & armhf (both ar armv7). Armel is slated to die after 12.04, if we can ensure armhf stability (we're very close). Jan 20 22:38:46 GrueMaster: thanks, didn't know that (didn;t try armhf yet) Jan 20 22:38:48 Supporting armv5 would be like supporting x86 486 code. Jan 20 22:39:00 true :-) Jan 20 22:39:01 GrueMaster: Do you happen to know what Debian's outlook is on armv5? Jan 20 22:39:04 Longterm? Jan 20 22:39:48 I'm personally not a debian person, but I understand they plan on supporting armv5 & armhf (armv7 only). Jan 20 22:40:03 I could be wrong though. Jan 20 22:40:29 GrueMaster: Thank you. I'll see if I can find a simiar debian channel to this and ask there. Jan 20 22:40:29 (on the debian part, not on ubuntu). Jan 20 22:41:53 wheezy is running ootb on my dockstar. and the page i posted looks like its easily running on your device. i am quite sure that is very well documented over the web Jan 20 22:42:53 k1l: Thank you. What services are you running on the dockstar, if you don't mind me asking? Jan 21 02:37:50 anyone running ubuntu on MX53? Jan 21 02:43:36 recur: All the time. Jan 21 02:44:03 oh sweet! Where did you get it from? I heard it's available somewhere but I haven't found it :) Jan 21 02:44:26 I heard it has GPU support and I have an MX53 chipset here begging for the GPU to be enabled :) Jan 21 02:44:44 Try freescale.com. I got one direct, and also one through digikey. Jan 21 02:44:49 oh okay Jan 21 02:45:35 Not sure about the gpu support off hand. I don't think it is open source. May be in restricted. Jan 21 02:50:42 It's not. Jan 21 02:50:46 We can't distribute it. :/ Jan 21 02:51:04 But freescale has downloadable bits you can register to get on the website. Jan 21 02:52:36 ohhh **** ENDING LOGGING AT Sat Jan 21 02:59:57 2012