**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Wed Feb 29 02:59:58 2012
Feb 29 04:06:24 <ATP> Hello all it's me the guy with the touchscreen problem :/ Ok i fixed the short circuit from the cable twist. I also soldered the jumpers and now the LCD display works but I only have output. Input does not work at all, should I install some driver? I have kernel 2.6.35 in my ubuntu 10.04 beagle. How do I see if touchscreen drivers are installed? Also should the input show up somewhere in the /dev/input , if not should I make
Feb 29 04:06:24 <ATP>  one myself with mknod command?
Feb 29 04:06:49 <ATP> thanks in advance
Feb 29 05:50:54 <lopi> anyone else trying to snag a raspberry pi in ten minutes? :P
Feb 29 05:51:56 <GrueMaster> Erm, no?  YOu do know that ubuntu will not run on it, right?
Feb 29 05:54:28 <lopi> eh doesn't mean it won't be fun to play with
Feb 29 05:55:59 <steev_> based on the fact that their website sucks and is down already, i doubt anyone will be buying any
Feb 29 05:57:42 <lopi> I seriously doubt that
Feb 29 06:01:45 <gildean> i could see lots of applications for the pi
Feb 29 06:02:25 <gildean> not desktop, but embedded
Feb 29 06:04:30 <steev_> meh, farnell.com is down, and that other one is like register to show your interest
Feb 29 06:04:39 <steev_> i hate sites like that, just stfu and take my money
Feb 29 06:19:54 <lopi> steev_: agreed, they just said on twitter it should be fixed at some point, keep refrsehing
Feb 29 06:20:10 <steev_> lopi: i have better things to do
Feb 29 06:20:21 <steev_> they had their chance
Feb 29 06:20:28 <steev_> like the XO i will not buy one now
Feb 29 07:12:10 <lilstevie> steev_, hah, I plan on getting one after the rush dies down, It is not an apple device, screw joining the queues for it
Feb 29 07:13:21 <steev_> lilstevie: your distributors are a reflection of self, if you choose (admittedly huge) suppliers who can't handle the load, you're not worth my time.  i wasn't particularly interested overall, but i figured i'd load up and see if i could, since neither site would even load, meh
Feb 29 07:16:15 <lilstevie> heh, well to be honest I am shocked about RS
Feb 29 07:16:21 <lilstevie> huge multinational
Feb 29 07:16:25 <lilstevie> can't take a bit of load
Feb 29 13:28:32 <pnphi> joined
Feb 29 13:28:40 <pnphi> excuse me ! ! !
Feb 29 13:28:52 <pnphi> please help me ! ! !
Feb 29 13:31:45 <pnphi> i have a image ubuntu arm Minimal
Feb 29 13:32:20 <pnphi> I want this image up to ubuntu desktop ! ! !
Feb 29 13:32:32 <pnphi> what do i do ?
Feb 29 13:32:46 <pnphi> install 1046 packages ? ?
Feb 29 13:32:49 <pnphi> or what else ?
Feb 29 13:34:12 <infinity> pnphi: What sort of system?
Feb 29 13:34:43 <pnphi> i don't understand ...
Feb 29 13:34:53 <infinity> pnphi: What computer is this on?
Feb 29 13:35:04 <pnphi> Qemu !
Feb 29 13:35:08 <infinity> pnphi: We generate desktop images for several target platforms (beagleboard, pandaboard, etc)
Feb 29 13:35:12 <infinity> Oh.
Feb 29 13:35:31 <pnphi> this image minimal run on qemu...! !
Feb 29 13:35:32 <infinity> If it's qemu, yeah, just "apt-get install ubuntu-desktop^" on your current minimal system. :P
Feb 29 13:35:55 <pnphi> what else ?
Feb 29 13:36:03 <infinity> What do you mean what else?
Feb 29 13:36:07 <infinity> That will do it.
Feb 29 13:36:33 <pnphi> other way ?
Feb 29 13:37:12 <infinity> There's no way to install ubuntu-desktop without installing ubuntu-desktop, no.
Feb 29 13:37:43 <pnphi> "install ubuntu-desktop" will install 1046 Packages..so long time
Feb 29 13:38:12 <infinity> Yes, and?
Feb 29 13:38:23 <infinity> If you want the full ubuntu desktop, you need all those packages.
Feb 29 13:38:31 <pnphi> yes
Feb 29 13:39:05 <pnphi> 1046 packages,how multiple packages to a package?
Feb 29 13:39:50 <pnphi> more packed into one package?
Feb 29 13:40:03 <infinity> Packages have dependencies.
Feb 29 13:40:21 <infinity> ubuntu-desktop depends on everything required for a "proper" Ubuntu Desktop environment.
Feb 29 13:40:27 <pnphi> yes
Feb 29 13:41:18 <pnphi> i thinks have a way to convert more packages into one package ! ! !
Feb 29 13:41:59 <pnphi> Can i build 1046 packages in Ubuntu ARM ?
Feb 29 13:43:11 <pnphi> How do i confiruge the Network in qemu which can ping www.google.com ?
Feb 29 13:43:31 <infinity> Read up on qemu bridged networking.
Feb 29 13:43:44 <pnphi> so that can ping ! ! !
Feb 29 13:43:52 <pnphi> can't ping
Feb 29 13:44:17 <pnphi> this will install packages , can't ping
Feb 29 13:44:34 <pnphi> how do i configure ?
Feb 29 13:47:54 <pnphi> help me,how i configure ?
Feb 29 13:51:32 <infinity> Like I said, go read up on qemu bridged networking.
Feb 29 13:51:48 <pnphi> no other way?
Feb 29 13:52:01 <infinity> And please don't demand help from others.  It doesn't tend to make them want to help.
Feb 29 13:52:32 <pnphi> yes thank you so much
Feb 29 16:02:53 <Cesar_cl> I find information on how to handle GPIO on a BeagleBoard-xm
Feb 29 16:11:40 <GrueMaster> Maybe on the beagleboard web site?  or elinux.org?
Feb 29 16:13:42 <Cesar_cl> and look at these sites and found no information
Feb 29 16:49:37 <GrueMaster> ogra_: my ucm configs for pandaES didn't get in.  They are not on the image.  I thought you posted them last week?
Feb 29 16:50:11 <ogra_> hmm, i definitely uploaded them
Feb 29 16:52:31 <GrueMaster> And are we not doing anything with the mx5 image?  I've asked multiple times on #ubuntu-release to have it added to the tracker.
Feb 29 16:53:02 <ogra_> we should test it too
Feb 29 16:53:11 <ogra_> not sure why it didnt end up on the tracker
Feb 29 16:53:22 <ogra_> it is surely in the same area as ac100
Feb 29 16:53:36 <GrueMaster> I already have, and filed a bug for the newer rev board not working, but no where to post results.
Feb 29 16:54:32 <ogra_> well, infinity claimed ownership for signing off mx5 and ac100 ... mx5 is on the manifest with his name next to it now, so it also should be on the tracker
Feb 29 16:59:52 <infinity> ogra_: I only added it to the manifest yesterday, mind you.
Feb 29 17:00:36 <ogra_> err, i added it
Feb 29 17:00:48 <ogra_> do we have it twice now ?
Feb 29 17:00:59 <GrueMaster> I'm debating on failing the image.  It works on older mx5 boards, but not the currently shipping models.
Feb 29 17:01:22 <GrueMaster> Still not in the tracker.
Feb 29 17:01:39 <ogra_> ah, you merged both into one line
Feb 29 17:11:05 <GrueMaster> ogra_: Are you testing (and reporting) on the AC100?
Feb 29 17:17:34 <GrueMaster> infinity: I'm at a quandry with the mx5 start-r rev.  Do I fail the image because of this or not?  I have a bug filed and marked as high (bug 943058).
Feb 29 17:17:35 <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 943058 in linux-linaro-lt-mx5 "Kernel doesn't support usb on newer rev quickstart boards." [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/943058
Feb 29 17:18:00 <infinity> GrueMaster: Don't fail the image, it works on most of the hardware out there.
Feb 29 17:18:07 <infinity> GrueMaster: But we really should try to escalate that bug.
Feb 29 17:18:27 <infinity> I'll see what I can do.
Feb 29 17:18:52 <GrueMaster> It rests solely on Linaro.  Interestingly, the SD that came with my original mx5 works fine on the newer board.
Feb 29 17:19:40 <infinity> Yeah, I'm sure it's a regression, not a question of new board support.
Feb 29 17:20:14 <GrueMaster> Well, the shipping image is based on Lucid with a Maverick kernel iirc.  I think it was entirely internal.
Feb 29 17:20:53 <GrueMaster> And in talking to the Linaro guys, they don't have the newer rev boards (they started shipping in December).
Feb 29 17:20:57 <infinity> The image that came with my QuickStart didn't have a kernel that was even remotely Ubuntu-related.
Feb 29 17:21:18 <infinity> 2.6.35.3-744-g27fdf7b
Feb 29 17:21:29 <GrueMaster> Well.  It is 2.6.35 iirc.
Feb 29 17:21:34 <GrueMaster> Yea.
Feb 29 17:21:36 <infinity> Well, that may have some Ubuntu sauce applied, not sure, but it's clearly a Freescale internal build.
Feb 29 17:23:45 <GrueMaster> yes,  never said it wasn't.  But I think I was told before UDS that they had branched off of our tree.
Feb 29 17:30:36 <ogra_> GrueMaster, yes, fine to do it
**** ENDING LOGGING AT Thu Mar 01 02:59:59 2012