**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Wed Aug 01 02:59:59 2012 Aug 01 08:06:08 janimo: the ac100 said, that xserver doesn't crash without xorg.conf ... Aug 01 08:06:21 maybe another test point ... Aug 01 08:26:29 Anyone aware of any other 1RU/2RU ARM powered servers? I've found the ZT R1801e (http://www.ztsystems.com/Default.aspx?tabid=1483) and am inquiring on price. Wondering if anyone is aware of any others like this? Aug 01 08:30:18 http://content.dell.com/us/en/enterprise/d/campaigns/project-copper Aug 01 08:30:29 http://www.calxeda.com/ Aug 01 08:30:45 prologic, ^ Aug 01 08:31:09 they are a bit bigger than 2U however Aug 01 08:33:09 yeah I'm aware of calxeda, but avoiding it due to cost Aug 01 08:34:59 also the dell link Aug 01 08:35:01 thats 3U sie Aug 01 08:35:03 *size Aug 01 08:35:18 yeah and it's price range would be high too Aug 01 08:35:41 so far I've only found the ZT system that might fit the power and cost budget Aug 01 08:38:41 prologic, how much does the full 8 slow thing cost? Aug 01 08:38:45 *slot Aug 01 08:39:45 I'm finding out :) Aug 01 08:39:55 but I bet it'll be cheaper than the Del 3RU version Aug 01 08:40:13 and the Calxeda based Boston viridis is about $50k fully speced Aug 01 08:44:00 I'll be happier using arm servers once we get a decent amount of ram in them Aug 01 11:33:18 marvin24, I am not aware of creating and xorg.conf, do the L4T tools do? I don't have the ac100 open now, but will check this too Aug 01 11:37:09 janimo: L4T provides an almost empty xorg.conf Aug 01 11:37:20 I don't know if nvidia-tegra just copies it Aug 01 16:52:07 infinity: ping Aug 01 16:52:28 oops Aug 01 16:52:45 infinity: give me a shout when you have a couple minutes Aug 01 16:59:40 prpplague: I'm vaguely around, what's up? Aug 01 17:02:41 infinity: see /msg Aug 01 17:51:54 something is very wrong in quantal: dpkg --print-foreign-architectures is: i386 armhf Aug 01 17:52:13 wookey: looks good to me. Aug 01 17:52:20 but sudo apt-get install zlib1g-dev:armhf gives: zlib1g-dev:armel : Depends: zlib1g:armel (= 1:1.2.7.dfsg-13) but it is not going to be installed Aug 01 17:52:37 wookey: now that's funny ;-) Aug 01 17:52:46 apt seems to be deciding I'd much prefer armel for reason despite not mentioning it anywhere Aug 01 17:53:31 well, the only place it is mentionned is in sources.list: deb [arch=armhf,armel] http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports quantal main universe Aug 01 17:53:32 wookey: No, that means you already have the armel package installed. Aug 01 17:53:51 wookey: At least, I suspect that's what it means. Aug 01 17:54:04 dpkg --get-selections | grep zlib says zlib1g:amd64install zlib1g-dev:amd64 install Aug 01 17:54:40 I have a libc6-armel-cross. that should be OK Aug 01 17:55:05 dpkg --get-selections | grep armel only shows toolchain armel-cross packages Aug 01 17:56:45 Weird. Aug 01 17:57:00 Could be that apt hates you. Aug 01 17:57:38 Drop the armel from sources.list and see if it gets wise? Aug 01 17:58:18 Though, I can't see how this would be apt's fault, even if both arches were enabled. Aug 01 17:58:34 Seems just plain weird. Aug 02 00:40:51 using the 1-Aug-2012 omap4+armhf image on a pandaboard ES. it installs the rootfs but leaves the uboot partition empty. is there a work around or shall i file a bug? Aug 02 02:29:19 mpls Aug 02 02:31:41 mpls ? Aug 02 02:34:14 jimerickson, a bug would be helpful indeed Aug 02 02:34:54 then a bug it shall be! Aug 02 02:56:47 filed bug #1032021 Aug 02 02:56:48 Launchpad bug 1032021 in ubiquity "installer does not create a uboot partition on omap4+armhf on pandaboard ES" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1032021 **** ENDING LOGGING AT Thu Aug 02 02:59:58 2012