**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Tue Jun 04 02:59:59 2013 Jun 04 12:16:14 ogra: can you spin one more Nexus 7 Kubuntu Active image? or give me the scripts to do that? Jun 04 12:16:54 a) the scripts wont help you and b) there is no desktop kernel for the nexus7 anymore in saucy Jun 04 12:16:54 I have access to a N7 now and can investigate why things are going wrong on the desktop image Jun 04 12:17:01 bah Jun 04 12:17:37 you could change your seeds to use the ubuntu touch kernel, but would then end up without touchscreen support Jun 04 12:17:38 ogra: mostly it seems like the OEM thingy doesn't run post boot Jun 04 12:18:09 wait, isn't the kernel image separate from the one that's flashed to the data partition? Jun 04 12:18:21 so why can't we use the kernel image that's already there + a different rootfs Jun 04 12:18:22 no Jun 04 12:18:28 uhhh Jun 04 12:18:51 http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/kubuntu-active/daily-preinstalled/current/raring-preinstalled-desktop-armhf+nexus7.bootimg < isn't that the kernel + initramfs? Jun 04 12:18:54 well, the kernel would be, but the installl updates the initrd which in turn updates the kernel from /boot Jun 04 12:19:01 yes Jun 04 12:19:06 ah Jun 04 12:19:12 but you need to re-roll the initrd after first boot Jun 04 12:19:19 I see Jun 04 12:21:19 ogra: can we bring the desktop kernel back? How much of a headache would it be to maintain it? Jun 04 12:22:08 since the one in raring already works, would it need much work to get it to boot saucy? Jun 04 12:22:26 you could use the linux-grouper tree with a different config and patches added to make touch input work Jun 04 12:23:02 ask the kernel team, i dont know how much work it is ... Jun 04 12:23:16 oh okay Jun 04 12:25:32 ogra: oh, one more question, why would the touch not work with the ubuntu touch kernel? Jun 04 12:26:01 because it needs a hack to the touchscreen driver (which breaks it on touch) Jun 04 12:26:16 and indeed a completely different config Jun 04 12:26:23 touch uses all the android bits Jun 04 12:27:15 I see Jun 04 13:14:49 ogra: does Ubuntu has working installer for any ARM device? Jun 04 13:14:59 ac100 Jun 04 13:15:12 and if you want d-i/ubiquity ... pandaboard Jun 04 13:15:15 ogra: where I can read about it? Jun 04 13:16:22 wiki.ubuntu.com/Ubiquity ?! Jun 04 13:16:36 hrw, about what specifically ? Jun 04 13:16:43 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ARM/TEGRA/AC100 found Jun 04 13:16:45 d-i or preinstalled ? Jun 04 13:16:54 for pandaboard it's bog-standard ubiquity just like on the desktop. For ac100, it's pre-installed system running in oem-config mode. Jun 04 13:17:16 ogra: thinking of a way to get more usable installer for chromebook than JayLee script Jun 04 13:17:19 preinstalled uses the ac100-tarball-nstaller package ... i guess yu need to read the source, it doesnt have any additional docu **** BEGIN LOGGING AT Tue Jun 04 17:53:05 2013 **** BEGIN LOGGING AT Tue Jun 04 18:36:00 2013 Jun 04 23:16:49 Does ubuntu arm run on the MK908 quadcore Jun 04 23:35:33 Would you say Ubuntu ARM is suitable for a production system or not yet? **** BEGIN LOGGING AT Tue Jun 04 23:42:28 2013 Jun 05 00:00:28 FreezingCold: What sort of production system? (But, yes, we run it in production all the time) Jun 05 00:01:03 infinity: actually I was just referring in general. In my case, payment/record keeping Jun 05 00:04:24 FreezingCold: If you can find hardware you think is decent/stable, I assure you that our software is fine. Jun 05 00:06:19 does it run on the mk908, or to ask another question, whats the most powerful device that can run ubuntu-arm Jun 05 00:07:05 doomlord_: I'd like to know too Jun 05 00:07:29 the MK908 would more or less be stable enough (probably) Jun 05 00:08:11 the problem I see with MK's is that Ubuntu has to normally do some kind of funky flash/update, no? Jun 05 00:09:06 Well, there are differences between "will it run on", "do we have an installer for", and "do we have a kernel for". Jun 05 00:09:47 We don't provide a kernel or installer for the MK908, but our userspace would run just fine on it. Jun 05 00:10:18 Which is true of any armv7 device. Jun 05 00:10:33 As for ones we provide kernels for, the Calxeda stuff's probably the "most powerful". Jun 05 00:10:37 But also pricy. :P Jun 05 00:10:43 oh the servers? Jun 05 00:11:48 i still haven't got round to trying it on my N7 .. last i heard there were some problems Jun 05 00:12:27 Ubuntu Touch is still a work in progress, for sure. Jun 05 00:44:20 the funky flash-kernel stuff is only a convenience thing, you can still run perfectly fine without it Jun 05 00:44:31 just updating kernels is a bit more manual **** ENDING LOGGING AT Wed Jun 05 02:59:57 2013