**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Mon Sep 01 02:59:58 2014 Sep 01 09:19:20 ppisati: seen https://launchpadlibrarian.net/183544214/buildlog_ubuntu-utopic-armhf.debian-installer_20101020ubuntu339_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz ? Sep 01 09:19:55 actually, the device tree isn't packed into the kernel-image anymore Sep 01 09:22:00 it was moved to /boot/$(uname -r) Sep 01 09:22:25 but there's a symlink from /boot/$(uname -r) to /lib/firmware/$(uname -r) Sep 01 09:22:34 so it shouldnt happen Sep 01 09:22:38 hold on Sep 01 09:24:12 ppisati: btw, you silently assume that the filesystem understands symlinks (some people still use fat for /boot partition) Sep 01 09:24:38 even worse, you assume the bootloader understands symlinks (which is not the case for u-boot) Sep 01 09:24:45 but that's a different problem Sep 01 09:24:50 ??? Sep 01 09:24:53 yes it does Sep 01 09:24:55 i tested it Sep 01 09:25:02 which version? Sep 01 09:25:09 the utopic version Sep 01 09:25:16 of uboot? Sep 01 09:25:19 yes Sep 01 09:25:32 * marvin24 didn't know that there is something like this Sep 01 09:25:47 uboot shouldn't be updated with the distro I think Sep 01 09:25:53 in fact Sep 01 09:26:03 the symlink is there just for flash-kernel Sep 01 09:26:12 uhm Sep 01 09:26:56 btw Sep 01 09:27:12 when you install a new kernel, flash-kernel is still run Sep 01 09:27:20 so if you don't modify your boot script Sep 01 09:27:27 nothing changes Sep 01 09:27:33 here is something completely different Sep 01 09:29:07 ppisati: well, I would be happy to be able to install a kernel :-) Sep 01 09:29:19 first the installer needs to be fixed Sep 01 09:29:49 I also have another question regard this (how the installer selects the kernel flavour), but this can also wait Sep 01 11:31:42 marvin24: i sent a revert for that patchset, i'll send a v2 and cc: you so you can raise your questions there Sep 01 11:36:01 ppisati: thanks Sep 01 11:36:28 I used the utopic installer on my tegra netbook Sep 01 11:36:44 everything went fine until it came to the kernel install Sep 01 11:37:01 there it says, can't find kernel flavour to install or something like this Sep 01 11:37:14 I guess there must be some hw detection which decides which flavour to use Sep 01 11:37:28 can you point me to some more infomation? Sep 01 11:48:08 I mean this one (with updated kernel) http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/dists/utopic/main/installer-armhf/current/images/generic/netboot/tegra/ Sep 01 13:14:26 honestly i don't know the installer enough Sep 01 13:14:40 infinity: maybe he knows the answer ^ Sep 01 13:14:48 ogra_: or him ^ Sep 01 13:18:46 marvin24: Yeah, libdebian-installer (and some other bits) need to know how to detect your system, though we really should switch it to just defaulting to "generic" for anything it can't detect, and wing it. Sep 01 14:02:51 infinity: yes, generic would be nice (and the right one for me) **** ENDING LOGGING AT Tue Sep 02 02:59:59 2014