**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Tue Mar 20 02:59:58 2012 Mar 20 03:06:34 yep Mar 20 03:32:09 wait, so nyx is the hardware abstraction layer? Mar 20 03:32:16 roughly? Mar 20 03:32:33 yeah Mar 20 03:33:00 hrm, interesting Mar 20 03:33:17 how feasibly is nyx + android userland + metadoc? Mar 20 03:56:44 depends on their browser implementation Mar 20 03:58:37 they have two choices Mar 20 03:59:06 (1) move the existing 3.0.5 code tree over to an Android kernel and ignore Palm changes Mar 20 03:59:20 (2) rewrite webOS to using Android purely Mar 20 04:14:03 All:nyx-lib builds appropriately on ubuntu 11.04 desktop x32 Mar 20 04:23:13 bhuey: aren't they already targeting the linux foundation kernel? Mar 20 04:30:42 holy crap Mar 20 04:30:49 the nyx documentation is awesome Mar 20 04:30:53 once you build it Mar 20 04:31:27 it's just doxygen Mar 20 04:32:05 im talking content Mar 20 10:07:10 summatusmentis: yes Mar 20 10:07:31 It's called mainline **** BEGIN LOGGING AT Tue Mar 20 12:29:04 2012 Mar 20 12:59:25 hi all Mar 20 12:59:43 is palm-package of any use to install native services? Mar 20 18:24:34 hi Mar 20 18:35:18 hi Mar 20 19:26:22 any success with isis desktop compilation? i'm still stuck Mar 20 19:34:19 I'm up to the isis-test, and then had to quit for a few days Mar 20 19:34:53 http://oi44.tinypic.com/ou6rr4.jpg Mar 20 21:16:49 folks Mar 20 21:21:12 hey Mar 20 21:27:40 Morning Mar 20 21:29:36 hey Mar 20 21:29:54 yeah they're doing this nxy thing for portability but they use GNOME's glib Mar 20 21:30:33 beta of Open webOS in August they say Mar 20 21:31:00 Nyx I should say Mar 20 21:31:24 there's already a portability layer btw, it's called Posix Mar 20 21:32:09 the blog post is a bit unclear Mar 20 21:32:21 http://developer.palm.com/blog/2012/03/sams-blog-march-progress/ Mar 20 21:33:16 It's basically the webOS 4.0 rewrite Mar 20 21:33:22 I hope they pull it off Mar 20 21:33:30 so lsk 3.3 + nyx + qtwebkit Mar 20 21:33:44 lunasysmgr is still missing Mar 20 21:33:51 and then the node services Mar 20 21:35:37 lunasys is likely going to be replace by the newer architecture Mar 20 21:35:58 from poking around the nyx code .. who actually consumes data from nyx? (e.g battery state or sensor data) Mar 20 21:36:02 and how Mar 20 21:36:07 where is that glue? Mar 20 21:36:15 It's pretty sparse Mar 20 21:36:27 hopefully they'll fill it out more as they get more specifics implemented Mar 20 21:36:29 the bigger picture is missing Mar 20 21:36:37 the key here is the new browser server Mar 20 21:36:47 well, the details are missing, a lot of things are missing Mar 20 21:37:02 and they have this pretty short August deadline, everybody is going to be watching them Mar 20 21:38:16 i wonder about the browser server .. why couldn't they use a "native" qt browser for the actual browser app Mar 20 21:38:34 and then use another one for the app runtime Mar 20 21:38:54 if you look at B2G, they even use just one browser process Mar 20 21:38:59 for runtime and browser Mar 20 21:39:01 yeah Mar 20 21:39:08 that's the way it should be done Mar 20 21:39:18 isn't the browser server idea a thing of the past? Mar 20 21:39:39 it needs to be multithreaded because of how CPUs are scaling upwards via core counts Mar 20 21:39:42 like back in 2008/2009 when it probably made sense Mar 20 21:40:08 because JS isn't really suited for heavy threading applications at this point with regards to how the Linux kernels is dispatched by userspace processes Mar 20 21:40:42 i wonder how others solve it Mar 20 21:40:47 e.g rim Mar 20 21:40:54 (but they're on top of QNX) Mar 20 21:40:57 * bhuey doesn't care :) Mar 20 21:41:18 if you would re-architect, would you go for the browser server approach? Mar 20 21:41:23 they have to move to a Chrome like process model which I'm hoping qtwebkit will do Mar 20 21:41:33 right Mar 20 21:41:39 same with firefox Mar 20 21:41:45 it's the single most important core component minus the kernel itself Mar 20 21:42:34 if you're webOS, then you need the best browser (runtime and browser) Mar 20 21:42:44 at the moment, that's bb os 2 Mar 20 21:43:18 really ? why not Chrome Beta on Android ? Mar 20 21:43:20 and safari/ios and chrome/android Mar 20 21:43:26 yeah Mar 20 21:43:29 just said Mar 20 21:43:38 iOS has a pretty bad ass browser as well Mar 20 21:43:45 yeah Mar 20 21:44:01 rim's webkit supports webGL for example Mar 20 21:44:05 and web workers Mar 20 21:44:18 with qtwebkit they'll be at the tip of the trunk which is good Mar 20 21:44:25 right Mar 20 21:44:30 it'll hopefully mean better compliance and less bugs Mar 20 21:44:41 most certainly better compilance Mar 20 21:44:43 the current browser is pretty buggy across all devices Mar 20 21:44:48 word Mar 20 21:45:01 it's not a good browser for a "web"OS Mar 20 21:45:37 the apps are limited relative to the Internet itself Mar 20 21:45:51 the only question here is the speed of the new browser Mar 20 21:46:13 on device, yeah Mar 20 21:46:39 i can only imagine browserserver slowing things down a bit Mar 20 21:46:50 I just wish that the Pre 3 had a better browser Mar 20 21:46:57 it's the device that I use the most Mar 20 21:47:04 i wish 3.0.5 had a better browser Mar 20 21:47:24 yeah maybe it'll come in August if they meet their deadlines Mar 20 23:53:01 . Mar 21 00:05:58 .. Mar 21 00:45:22 so, today's release is nice Mar 21 00:45:30 love them meeting milestones. Mar 21 01:13:21 in the meanwhile, I'll keep drooling over the Prometheus movie that's coming in June while waiting for the next webOS release Mar 21 02:48:13 what is the news Mar 21 02:51:03 looking for news **** ENDING LOGGING AT Wed Mar 21 02:59:57 2012