**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Wed Sep 30 02:59:59 2015 Sep 30 05:14:51 Tofe: This looks quite elegant if that provides sync support :) I would've expected a lot more code ;) Sep 30 06:02:08 Herrie|2: yes, I'm quite happy with that code; there may still be a bug if a property is changed during a sync call, but that wouldn't be too much trouble to fix Sep 30 06:46:48 Tofe: Curious to see if WebEngine will bring any performance improvements to Enyo 1/2 apps. I suspect it will actually :) Sep 30 09:18:19 Herrie|2: it now builds fine; more news tonight... Sep 30 09:30:50 :) Sep 30 09:48:27 Herrie|Veer: at some point in time, we should create our fork of qtwebengine and qtwebengine-chromium; for qtwebchannel, I think we can afford a simple patch, at it is only one file modification, and it doesn't seem to change much. Sep 30 09:48:48 s/at/as/ Sep 30 09:49:34 Nothing urgent though, as long as I don't get apps to start correctly Sep 30 09:57:11 Tofe: Why would we fork then and not just simply do the patch in OE like we do for other things like ofono, connman etc? Sep 30 10:26:34 JaMa: morning Sep 30 10:29:04 morning Sep 30 10:29:51 JaMa: Can you add qtwebengine to our builds too? So we have both webkit & webengine for now while w e migrate things? Sep 30 10:57:08 didn't I fee days ago? Sep 30 10:57:51 ab0a72f mesa: downgrade to 10.3.7 which is last version with working EGL-fbdev Sep 30 10:57:54 43a17c0 packagegroup-webos-ports-development: Add qtwebengine plugins and examples Sep 30 11:00:15 JaMa: morning Sep 30 11:00:33 JaMa: I would have also a request Sep 30 11:01:23 JaMa: Would it be possible to include the cmake files for QtWebEngine? Sep 30 11:01:36 Tofe: http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2015-September/103575.html http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2015-September/103578.html http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2015-September/103560.html Sep 30 11:01:46 Tofe: yes, 2nd link :) Sep 30 11:02:13 \o/ great! Sep 30 11:02:38 not yet in master branch, only in jansa/master for more testing Sep 30 11:03:34 Sure sure Sep 30 11:41:15 JaMa: You sure you included the whole webengine not just the examples? Last week you said you didn't include webengine based on earlier comments from morphis Sep 30 12:10:20 plugins and examples, it's the same commit as you were testing before with jansa/fido Sep 30 12:12:22 OK will give that a go then when home :) Sep 30 13:17:38 JaMa: Based on increased image size for N4 of approx 24 MB I guess you're right :) Sep 30 18:42:18 Tofe: How's your testing going? Sep 30 18:46:59 Herrie: making progress :) I had to relaunch a build of qtwebengine because of a stupid typo, but otherwise I think it could work Sep 30 18:49:24 Tofe: A reason you PR-ed against master-next? Sep 30 19:58:31 Herrie: just becase it concerns upcoming WebEngine Sep 30 21:10:45 Tofe: We already have webengine in the build, so we should be OK against master? Sep 30 21:11:32 Herrie: oh, yes, it would be ok even if webengine wasn't there. Sep 30 21:39:00 Herrie: currently for WebEngine I'm getting a blank page; however, it looks like webos-api.js isn't parsed, so this may explain that. **** ENDING LOGGING AT Thu Oct 01 02:59:59 2015