**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Sun Feb 26 03:00:03 2017 Feb 26 09:39:22 Morning Feb 26 09:39:42 morning Feb 26 09:39:54 Tofe: How can I pull a log when I cannot ADB in LuneOS? Feb 26 09:40:32 linux_unix-10_: that would make things quite tricky I think - what if the device hangs? Feb 26 09:41:05 Herrie: which log ? logcat, dmesg, journal ? Feb 26 09:41:59 Well with Pyro it boots to LuneOS, so I get firstuse, but I cannot connect to wifi, no bars and no data in FirstUse so want to debug what's wrong :P Feb 26 09:42:13 So I guess journal Feb 26 09:42:32 I can run fingerterm and save journalctl output for example Feb 26 09:42:40 Just not sure how to pull this log Feb 26 09:42:51 Normally I would use ADB but cannot now :P Feb 26 09:42:53 ah, ok Feb 26 09:43:08 you have a recovery? Feb 26 09:43:46 Yeah Feb 26 09:44:33 I found some instructions from earlier but seems those might have changed with 12.1 ? Feb 26 09:45:16 I don't know what you're referring to exactly, but if you boot to recovery, you should be able to pull /data/luneos/whatever Feb 26 09:46:31 Ah I didn't see anything in my /media/internal Feb 26 09:46:38 Maybe the log file didn't save properly Feb 26 09:46:42 Let me try again Feb 26 09:46:50 Could be I fatfingered something in FIngerterm :P Feb 26 09:48:46 morning Feb 26 09:51:44 Tofe: Hmmz I successfully managed to do a journalctl > /media/internal/fu.txt Feb 26 09:51:54 Then when I go to recovery and mount data Feb 26 09:52:03 I can do a cd /data/luneos/media/internal Feb 26 09:52:11 But I only have a wallpapers there Feb 26 09:53:50 Herrie: /data/luneos-data ? Feb 26 09:54:23 Ah ok it's in /data/luneos-data/userdata Feb 26 09:57:01 I get quite some Feb 22 21:27:59 mako systemd[1]: activitymanager.service: Failed to set invocation ID on control group /system.slice/activitymanager.service, ignoring: Operation not supported Feb 26 09:57:56 Also on mediaindexer, sleepd and many other bits Feb 26 09:58:03 So that might explain the weird FirstUse behavior :P Feb 26 10:07:02 Tofe: thanks for comments, that if is fixed now Feb 26 10:08:29 nizovn: I'm hesitating on how to review the rest; looking at the diff is hopeless, and just looking at the source code won't necessarily help to see a generic solution for both tabletUi and non-tabletUi Feb 26 10:09:38 ok Feb 26 10:10:35 Still, I'll give it a try. It's mostly StatusBar.qml's review which is complicated. Feb 26 11:52:33 Tofe: Seems the invocation ID might have to do with kernel version requirements in systemd232. Do we have support for "Your ancient kernel doesn't support xattrs on cgroupfs, simply because it is too old." on Mako & Hammerhead? Feb 26 11:52:40 See https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/5236 Feb 26 11:52:57 Alternatively we could downgrade to 231 to see if that "solves" the issue Feb 26 12:49:02 Herrie: L. Poettering said that we can just ignore this message Feb 26 12:49:38 There's also a patch proposal to just switch it to a debug message, meaning we wouldn't even see it anymore Feb 26 12:50:02 So, like the guy who opened the ticket, I think you've been misleaded by the error message Feb 26 12:53:12 Also, I find Poettering's point of view quite interesting. He really isn't considering addressing the embedded systems usecase. I think OpenEmbedded should really be careful about upgrading systemd to the latest versions. Feb 26 15:14:39 Tofe: OK Feb 26 15:14:49 I'll look for something else obvious then for the errors Feb 26 16:31:42 nizovn: ping Feb 26 16:32:07 Tofe: pong Feb 26 16:32:55 nizovn: how would you prefer for the tablet UI integration: either I can propose an integration on top of your commits, or you do it Feb 26 16:33:31 I don't think GH comments will be efficient to do that for what's left to do (rework the flow of StatusBar, mostly) Feb 26 16:37:36 * nizovn is thinking very slow... Feb 26 16:39:40 i can try to do integration, but i'm not sure how to separate notifications model from notificationArea Feb 26 16:40:27 which model? Feb 26 16:40:59 ah, this mergedModel thing? Feb 26 16:41:11 yup Feb 26 16:41:29 I didn't realize it was all entangled in there Feb 26 16:43:23 I'd say we try to put in common all that is until line 218, and the rest can be in two versions Feb 26 16:44:34 I can propose some separation on the main branch Feb 26 16:46:00 would be nice, thanks Feb 26 17:03:22 nizovn: This will add notifications on top like on TP on tablet layouts? That would be nice :D Feb 26 17:03:41 The phone style on tablets always bugged me a bit :P Feb 26 17:08:06 Herrie: yes, and music controls in legacy app seems to work as well :) Feb 26 17:09:19 nizovn: https://github.com/webOS-ports/luna-next-cardshell/commits/tofe/work last commit: would that fit your need? Feb 26 17:09:30 (not tested on device :) ) Feb 26 17:10:18 oops, I just saw a mistake. I'll fix it. Feb 26 17:10:45 nizovn: Nice :D Feb 26 17:10:55 Now we just need the controls on the lockscreen to be added sometime :D Feb 26 17:11:09 yes.. Feb 26 17:11:36 done, amended last commit Feb 26 17:11:47 Tofe: thanks, i will see Feb 26 17:12:23 Herrie, nizovn: I made a first try some time ago for notifications: https://github.com/webOS-ports/luna-next-cardshell/commits/tofe/lockscreen-dashboards Feb 26 17:12:43 Tofe: I need to give that a go :) Feb 26 17:13:18 I don't even remember how it looked like :D Feb 27 01:27:10 I have some low-level kernel or boot-loader questions about the LuneOS kernel how it recognizes different amounts of RAM found in different devices. Anyone game? **** ENDING LOGGING AT Mon Feb 27 03:00:01 2017