**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Fri Sep 11 02:59:57 2020 **** BEGIN LOGGING AT Fri Sep 11 03:03:13 2020 **** BEGIN LOGGING AT Fri Sep 11 04:30:53 2020 **** BEGIN LOGGING AT Fri Sep 11 06:53:17 2020 Sep 11 07:03:38 JaMa: thanks! tissot would be interesting to test, but it looks like it might be an easy migration here **** BEGIN LOGGING AT Fri Sep 11 09:48:14 2020 **** BEGIN LOGGING AT Fri Sep 11 10:05:45 2020 Sep 11 10:29:15 I will test Tenderloin and Mido later today probably **** BEGIN LOGGING AT Fri Sep 11 11:14:37 2020 Sep 11 11:39:13 looks like dunfell will be the base yocto version for Qt 6.0 Sep 11 11:39:33 ^ (meta-qt6) https://www.qt.io/blog/qt6-development-hosts-and-targets Sep 11 11:58:03 JaMa: I thought meta-qt5 was mainly your "baby"? Seems that Qt will now "officially" support it in Qt6? Sep 11 12:41:17 Herrie: yet it was, but I wasn't planing to work on meta-qt6, so it's good that they will provide it Sep 11 12:41:26 s/yet/yes/g Sep 11 12:41:49 I thought they hired you and would pay you nice €€€ for it :'( Sep 11 12:41:55 But seems not :'( Sep 11 12:42:34 that would work, but all my work on meta-qt5 was mostly in my free time and I'm quite happy to get rid of it Sep 11 12:43:48 some work on initial 5.0 release was paid by LGE, because we had internal fork of it, which was even more messy and my job was to resolve it more properly (which I did in public meta-qt5) Sep 11 12:44:26 since then I was doing it on my own and LGE just paid for internal webOS adaptation to new release from meta-qt5 Sep 11 12:44:56 and now Qt says that they did most of the work on meta-qt5 and "opensource community" just kept it buildable with newer yocto.. Sep 11 12:45:11 so now I'm not even motivated to contribute to meta-qt6 Sep 11 12:45:38 JaMa: That's nasty of them :( Sep 11 12:45:44 They did very little from what I could see... Sep 11 12:47:17 they did many upgrades (like SRCREV bumps and corresponding updates even for some new major versions where I was behind or not interested) Sep 11 12:48:30 https://github.com/meta-qt5/meta-qt5/issues/349 https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-81928 "We have done most of the Qt module update changes while making sure meta-qt5 works with latest yocto has been done by the opensource maintainers." Sep 11 12:57:19 Grrrr Sep 11 12:58:00 ... **** BEGIN LOGGING AT Fri Sep 11 13:02:29 2020 **** BEGIN LOGGING AT Fri Sep 11 16:00:26 2020 **** BEGIN LOGGING AT Fri Sep 11 16:51:28 2020 **** BEGIN LOGGING AT Fri Sep 11 19:36:35 2020 Sep 11 20:46:25 tissot seems fine with the dunfell build Sep 11 20:46:49 If tenderloin looks alright too, I propose we switch testing to dunfell right away Sep 11 20:52:06 :) Sep 11 20:52:29 I've triggered another builds after small oe-core bump (which invalidates most of the sstate, but otherwise it's not dangerous) Sep 11 20:53:19 JaMa: I'll resume my investigations on the cameras, but it's taking much more time than what I thought Sep 11 20:53:38 (well, I'll resume it rebased on dunfell ;) ) **** BEGIN LOGGING AT Fri Sep 11 21:17:20 2020 **** BEGIN LOGGING AT Fri Sep 11 22:41:20 2020 **** ENDING LOGGING AT Sat Sep 12 02:59:57 2020