**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Mon Sep 10 02:59:58 2012 Sep 10 14:25:23 has anybody seen this when using nodejs/http.get? Sep 10 14:25:23 http.js:1440 - var req = options.agent.appendMessage(options); - TypeError: Cannot call method 'appendMessage' of undefined Sep 10 14:51:50 ok, seems you can't pass the URL as a string in older versions of nodejs, so use url.parse(reqUrl) Sep 10 16:49:50 how do you turn off data w/o a patch? any way? Sep 10 17:34:57 fxspec06_: phone settings? Sep 10 17:46:11 yes it is under phone settings under "Network" section Sep 10 17:47:24 thanks guys Sep 10 17:47:36 i figured it out, saved my but Sep 10 19:36:04 building this thing really takes a while. Sep 10 19:36:27 and on the previous run my vm ran out of memory :-/ Sep 10 20:06:25 imarcusthis: are you building OWO? Sep 10 20:06:39 oh, wrong channel Sep 10 20:06:47 yeah, owo Sep 10 20:07:01 GodGinrai: built it now. Sep 10 20:08:00 lol yea, I was going to let you know that you should probably join #webos-ports if you hadn't already :P Sep 10 20:08:15 oh, I thought #openwebos was the channel to be in. Sep 10 20:08:44 GodGinrai: ooh, lots more people there. Sep 10 20:08:49 o.o That may be one, too. Not sure Sep 11 00:36:20 WOOOOOOOOOOOOO! Sep 11 00:41:30 EricBlade: Yes?! Sep 11 00:43:44 woo. Sep 11 00:44:12 something working now?! Sep 11 00:47:32 Does anyone know if its possible to metadoctor a sprint franken pre2 to an at&t pre2 (by switching out the comm board with a att pre+)? Sep 11 00:48:16 i went ahead and swapped the boards but it says that the doctor I built following the webosinternals guide isn't compatible with the phone connected Sep 11 00:54:57 andrew__: I think that you are better off posting this to webos-internals. Sep 11 00:55:41 thanks I moved the question over there Sep 11 01:11:16 so.. who wants to take over writing the whatsapp app if i don't have enough time to keep up with it Sep 11 01:18:56 EricBlade: I would say me.... but I have so much on my plate, it would probably become a dead project... :( Sep 11 01:19:13 What if you put it up on github? Sep 11 01:19:48 I mean, I might be able to clean it up. I just can't necessairly keep up with WhatsApp changing their protocol... Sep 11 01:19:56 the node module itself is on github right now, and if it comes down to that, i'll probably add the webos service to it Sep 11 01:19:57 at least, not masive changes... Sep 11 01:20:25 yeah, that's about the only way that I could help. Sep 11 01:20:40 I wonder... maybe we can get it merged into filmore_'s Synergy messaging plugins? Sep 11 01:20:57 It might stay updated by others of us? Sep 11 01:21:21 at this time, it's sufficient for text messaging, but until someone (or me) gets around to re-doing the part that takes in data from the socket connection, it's susceptible to being crashed frequently Sep 11 01:22:21 That's probably WebKit stuffs. I doubt that will happen in webOS <= 3.0.5... :( Sep 11 01:22:43 but who knows. Sep 11 01:23:09 nope it's "me being slightly stupid and building it so that it would process the data immediately upon receiving" instead of building a buffer and going through it as necessary Sep 11 01:23:20 ah Sep 11 01:23:27 well, that makes it easier! Sep 11 01:23:36 I mean, at least for me to contribute. Sep 11 01:23:55 I mean, I *am* working on WebKit. But that is mostly for the browser at the moment. Sep 11 01:24:51 the node module processes directly in the socket's data event, whereas it needs to buffer all incoming data, and process only when it has enough to complete the packets Sep 11 01:25:31 Ah. So it should probably have a queue in a database somewhere. Sep 11 01:25:39 And then handle that when it is ready. Sep 11 01:27:35 i would think that a database would be excessive. normally, i think what it would do, is just have the socket data event append all data received that tick into a buffer, have it fire an event that data was received, and that event checks the packet at the front of the queue's length, and processes it, repeat until there's no data or not enough data to fulfill the packet Sep 11 01:44:55 that would probably work too. Sep 11 01:45:44 I should probably look at the protocol and how the current stuff works before trying to guess at how to improve it. :P Sep 11 01:50:16 it would normally just have to deal with receiving a small handful of TCP packets before parsing large single XMPP stanzas Sep 11 01:50:32 right now, if the stanzas fit into single packets, it works fine **** ENDING LOGGING AT Tue Sep 11 02:59:58 2012