**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Fri Jun 24 02:59:57 2011 **** ENDING LOGGING AT Fri Jun 24 03:19:19 2011 **** BEGIN LOGGING AT Fri Jun 24 03:20:10 2011 Jun 24 08:36:00 morning all Jun 24 09:34:21 morning all Jun 24 10:12:06 morning RP__ Jun 24 12:51:56 sgw: there? Jun 24 13:32:11 * RP__ is beginning to suspect our biggest performance limiting factor is bitbake's memory usage Jun 24 14:11:23 ERROR: Function 'File: '/home/kraj/work/angstrom/sources/downloads/pseudo-1.1.1.tar.bz2' has md5 checksum 3ae715aec9a75b5f1cee5f660879b358 when dd59766c17e199fe6144fce8a2c67802 was expected (from URL: 'http://www.yoctoproject.org/downloads/pseudo/pseudo-1.1.1.tar.bz2')' failed Jun 24 14:12:04 can someone confirm ? bitbake -ccleanall pseudo-native;bitbake pseudo-native Jun 24 14:17:58 I think even when the tars are downloaded already there should be an option in bitbake to recheck the checksums and that should be done as a separate test once a week on autobuilders with bitbake check-world-checksums :) Jun 24 14:23:02 khem: even more - some tool to deal with sources Jun 24 14:23:10 checksumming, cleanup Jun 24 14:23:27 clean unused more sources e.g. Jun 24 14:25:07 I was doing build from scratch and all images failed Jun 24 14:25:18 a night of build time lost Jun 24 14:25:53 may be something borked the tar Jun 24 14:26:25 unpack test then as well needed :) Jun 24 14:27:44 khem: I just checked and my download has the right sum Jun 24 14:28:00 ok Jun 24 14:28:13 RP__: it seems my download somehow got corrupted Jun 24 14:28:25 khem: At least the system detected it :) Jun 24 14:28:55 in this case yeah Jun 24 14:29:04 khem: check yocto.org ip ;) Jun 24 14:29:06 heh it helped me Jun 24 14:29:18 yoctoproject.org I mean :) Jun 24 14:29:44 I see the tar is not untarrable but its there so something went wrong during download Jun 24 14:30:39 ok now it works after redownloading Jun 24 21:50:45 khem, ping Jun 24 23:28:47 sgw: yes Jun 24 23:45:30 Khem you stil there? Jun 25 00:03:59 sgw: yes Jun 25 00:05:06 khem: I am going through all the pull requests, trying to figure out what in and not, I found an old one of your for hardfp, what's the state of that? Is there an updated version? Jun 25 00:07:12 sgw: ignore that for now Jun 25 00:07:16 it has to be redone Jun 25 00:07:21 a bit differently Jun 25 00:07:32 khem: thanks, just wanted to check, if I missed something. Jun 25 00:07:47 I havent worked on it though since it has been working for me :) Jun 25 00:08:02 no and there are no pending patches from me other than those Jun 25 00:08:04 so I am good Jun 25 00:08:34 sgw: do u also update patchwork ? Jun 25 00:08:46 i.e. patches.oe.org Jun 25 00:14:19 khem: not yet, we have have not set that up you, we are also looking at gerrit as a possibility, right now no time for either, although I guess once we make a choice and execute on it, it will be easier! Jun 25 00:24:17 gerrit needs that repo crap Jun 25 00:24:22 is it simple enough Jun 25 00:26:45 can goole folks do something thats not java **** ENDING LOGGING AT Sat Jun 25 02:59:57 2011