**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Thu Dec 01 02:59:58 2011
Dec 01 07:32:43 <dany> Why does eglibc RDEPEND on bash, seems a bit excessive.. no ?
Dec 01 07:33:45 <JaMa> only some subpackage like ldd should RDEPEND on i
Dec 01 07:34:36 <dany> grep bash meta/recipes-core/eglibc/eglibc-package.inc -> RDEPENDS_${PN}-utils += "bash"
Dec 01 07:35:26 <JaMa> so it's eglibc-utils not libc as such.. and there is some util using bashisms... so for it to work there is bash
Dec 01 07:35:52 <JaMa> ie SHR root@gjama ~ $ head /usr/bin/xtrace
Dec 01 07:35:52 <JaMa> #! /bin/bash
Dec 01 07:38:40 <dany> True, but "bitbake -g -u depexp core-image-minimal" lists bash as RDEPEND:ed, i.e. installed on rootfs.
Dec 01 07:39:59 <dany> And it seems to be installed on the rootfs.
Dec 01 07:45:55 <dany> Any way to use a local.conf selection to remove the ldd subpackage ?
Dec 01 07:53:53 <JaMa> ldd is not installed by default (at least here) it's eglibc-utils (sorry if I've confused you before)
Dec 01 08:00:20 <dany> I found the culprit, bash was sucked in by usbutils and (keymaps->console-tools->bash)
Dec 01 17:55:59 <otavio> Is Dexuan Cui around?
Dec 01 17:56:17 <otavio> pixman 0.24 fails to build if zlib is not available, it lacks a depends on it
Dec 01 18:20:35 <incandescant> otavio: he's in PRC - he'll be sleeping atm
Dec 01 18:20:52 <incandescant> otavio: I can submit a patch unless you care to?
Dec 01 18:22:58 <otavio> incandescant: in fact I am not sure if it or one of their depends that lacks the depends
Dec 01 18:23:13 <otavio> incandescant: it doesn't seem to link againt pixman
Dec 01 18:23:47 <incandescant> otavio: something needs investigating then :-/
Dec 01 18:24:02 <incandescant> otavio: do you need someone to look into it?
Dec 01 18:24:15 <incandescant> s/need/want
Dec 01 18:24:32 <otavio> incandescant: the build failed here and it said it was missing zlib.h
Dec 01 18:24:42 <otavio> incandescant: on a second run it worked
Dec 01 18:24:53 <incandescant> otavio: is zlib.h now in the sysroot?
Dec 01 18:25:01 <otavio> incandescant: i think i will send it to our autobuilder for testing
Dec 01 18:25:32 <incandescant> otavio: okey dokes, I think we had another failure on our ab but I'd not heard of pixman failing yet
Dec 01 22:37:25 <tlw> first time trying yocto, using openSUSE 11.4 64-bit host
Dec 01 22:37:43 <tlw> build fails building pseudo-native
Dec 01 22:38:27 <tlw> siteinfo.bbclass *thinks* i'm on a 32-bit machine because i have glibc-devel-32bit installed
Dec 01 22:39:34 <tlw> once i remove that package everything proceeds fine
Dec 01 22:40:04 <tlw> is there a way to define/override SITEINFO_BITS setting in siteinfo.bbclass?
**** ENDING LOGGING AT Fri Dec 02 02:59:57 2011