**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Thu Sep 19 02:59:59 2013 Sep 19 07:17:42 good morning Sep 19 07:54:34 morning all Sep 19 09:43:03 any idea why uclibc cannot be compiled with TUNE_FEATURES = "armv7a vfp thumb neon callconvention-hard cortexa9"? Sep 19 09:43:11 i got this http://pastebin.com/MiibC6LB Sep 19 10:33:18 Do you know any regular meta-java users? I need some support, meta-java maintainer is not responsive. Sep 19 10:35:26 Krz_: simply ask Sep 19 10:37:03 my problem is that I want to build openjdk-7-jre for headless system, without x11 support Sep 19 10:37:17 and recipe rejects to build without it Sep 19 10:37:41 I can't believe there is no way to add java support for headless Sep 19 10:38:07 and I'm using uclibc, dylan-9.0.2 Sep 19 10:38:25 Krz_: pasting some actual errors might be useful Sep 19 10:38:50 i can imagine that nobody has tested that configuration (uclibc and no X) even if openjdk does support it Sep 19 10:42:14 error message: http://pastebin.com/Zq0m6yxa Sep 19 10:43:48 Krz_: right, so the recipe just depends on the X libraries without respecting the distro settings Sep 19 10:44:03 it should check DISTRO_FEATURES when adding dependencies Sep 19 10:44:30 a hack to test would be to just delete the X dependencies and see what then breaks but that obviously won't be accepted into meta-java Sep 19 10:44:50 ok, will try that Sep 19 10:45:50 debian has packages that build without X Sep 19 10:46:09 so you should have a look at those if/when it stops compiling for the options/patches/hacks you need Sep 19 11:39:25 building for beaglebone (black) on yocto is a straight forward process or a complex setup should be performed ? Sep 19 12:20:21 rburton: hi ! I've successfully built mesa with gallium activated by patching mesa. However, "rpm -ql mesa" displays me only "/etc". Am I missing something ? Do I have to put something special to install completely mesa in my image ? thank you Sep 19 12:24:20 Hi guys...one simple question (maybe): i did some tests on Master branch and i cannot build a core-minimal-image for qemuarm with debian packages... (i just changed PACKAGE_CLASSES ?= "package_deb".... bitbake failed with "Unable to read /home/user/Devel/Yocto/TestJC/TestDEB/tmp/sysroots/x86_64-linux/etc/apt/sources.list.d/ - DirectoryExists (2: No such file or directory)" .... any idea ?? Thanks Sep 19 12:44:43 Hi all, I am using fakeroot do_install, but still files in /dev are installed like : -rw-rw-rw- 1 drasko drasko 0 Sep 19 14:15 rtp0 instead like : crw-rw-rw- 1 root root 150, 0 Sep 12 13:46 rtp0 Sep 19 12:44:52 Why is that and how to install as a root? Sep 19 12:53:20 drasko: where are you viewing that listing? Sep 19 12:54:15 drasko: if it's outside the fakeroot environment or the image booted on the target, then of course the files are really owned by you Sep 19 12:55:57 you can use bitbake -c devshell to see what the permissions will be like in the target environment Sep 19 13:15:06 where is the correct place to put preffered versions? local.conf, distro, image..? Sep 19 13:22:00 jackmitchell, depends :) Sep 19 13:22:14 local or distro would be good places Sep 19 13:23:49 Crofton|work: yeah I settled on distro as multiple users will be building Sep 19 13:24:05 just wanted to make sure it wasn't a taboo! Sep 19 13:24:06 good choice Sep 19 13:26:42 PREFERRED_PROVIDER / PREFERRED_VERSION in an image recipe won't work in any case Sep 19 13:27:01 distro config is the best place Sep 19 13:33:53 elbc: mesa splits into a million different packages Sep 19 13:38:06 more packages = more success Sep 19 13:38:19 ;) Sep 19 13:38:34 totally. Sep 19 13:47:11 do you know any test framework in Yocto? Sep 19 13:47:19 bluelightning: I am observing after build Sep 19 13:47:30 so - outside the fakeroot environment I guess... Sep 19 13:47:41 Krz_: in what sense? Sep 19 13:47:58 drasko: right, I guessed... so it's expected that you'd see what you're seeing Sep 19 13:48:19 let me try with bitbake -c devshell Sep 19 13:48:58 rburton: some userspace framework for testing peripherials, like iperf for networking Sep 19 13:49:57 is there a way to do a distro "bbappend" so I want to specify a file which holds some distrovars which overrides the default-oecore distro? Sep 19 13:50:19 and I don't want to put them in local.conf Sep 19 13:50:36 bluelightning: I do not get how to use this one... I observe the files that were made before - same owner and permissions... Sep 19 13:50:38 or do I have to essentially "fork" the oe-core distro and make sure that I keep it in line with changes Sep 19 13:51:01 so, what's the benfit of -c devshell? Sep 19 13:51:02 jackmitchell: creating your own distro config containing only the changes you want will do that, because the default distro config is always loaded before that Sep 19 13:51:12 bluelightning: perfect, thatks Sep 19 13:52:21 drasko: for your case, -c devshell runs a shell within the fakeroot (pseudo) environment so you can inspect the permissions as they are seen by fakeroot tasks Sep 19 13:53:17 I used fakeroot only for do_install() Sep 19 13:53:39 and when I enter devshell I see the same permissions of files Sep 19 13:54:16 plus in devshell I am user drasko, not root Sep 19 13:54:29 drasko: which version are you using? Sep 19 13:54:53 rburton: Finally I've installed all rpm linked to mesa, no more error linked to gallium displayed after launching a gst-launch pipe, but I've got an error on waylandsink : could not initialize wayland output. Sep 19 13:55:01 how to check this? Sep 19 13:55:59 drasko: are you using poky? if so, did you download a tarball, or fetch from git? if the latter which branch are you using, master or something else? Sep 19 13:56:15 BB_VERSION = "1.16.0" Sep 19 13:56:24 DISTRO = "poky" Sep 19 13:56:32 DISTRO_VERSION = "1.3" Sep 19 13:57:58 drasko: ah right, devshell did not run under fakeroot in that version Sep 19 13:58:33 drasko: in which case you can either inspect the contents of the package or the image Sep 19 13:59:43 OK, but I have another issue Sep 19 13:59:56 ERROR: QA Issue: No GNU_HASH in the elf binary: '/home/drasko/yocto/build/tmp/work/armv7ahf-vfp-neon-poky-linux-gnueabi/xenomai-2.6.2.1-r0/packages-split/xenomai/usr/bin/cmd_bits' Sep 19 14:03:06 drasko: this may help: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.handhelds.openembedded/30326 Sep 19 14:05:56 bluelightning: Hi Paul...no suggestion regarding my debian packages issue ? Sep 19 14:06:17 OlivierG: unfortunately no, I don't have a lot of experience with the deb backend Sep 19 14:06:49 :( ... Sep 19 14:16:03 rburton: I have submitted to yocto and poky's mailing list to know where to push my patches for wayland/weston 1.2, when I'll know I'll send to you too my patches url Sep 19 14:17:13 elbc: you can post patches to the oe-core list Sep 19 14:19:33 rburton: ok thanks I think I'll do that during next week. Do you know how to fix waylandsink problem (could not initialize wayland ouput) ? thanks Sep 19 14:25:04 bluelightning: I have added TARGET_CC_ARCH += "${LDFLAGS}" in my .bb file Sep 19 14:25:12 However, the error still persist : Sep 19 14:25:46 ah, no wait Sep 19 14:25:54 it is an other type of error... Sep 19 14:34:17 elbc: no idea, never tried gst on wayland. i will next week unless you send patches that fix it :) Sep 19 14:38:09 rburton: ok thanks ! don't hesitate to tell me if you have more news ! Sep 19 15:51:15 to compile uclibc with thumb2 I had to import two patches in uclibc-git not yet mainlined in uclibc itself. what about this case? I submit a patch o wait for uclibc guys? Sep 19 15:51:55 khem: ^ Sep 19 15:58:32 Im seeing alot of this "Package base-files version 3.0.14-r73 has no valid architecture, ignoring.", when running preinstalls with opkg. Whats up with this ? Sep 19 16:17:48 bluelightning_ khem I'm going to submit the patch. Fell free to drop it :D Sep 19 16:20:06 n01: ok, in the absence of any advice from khem I'd say that sounds like the right thing to do Sep 19 16:20:29 hmmm, can LICENCE_FLAGS_WHITELIST go anywhere but local.conf? Sep 19 16:20:48 distro.conf doesn't seem to pick it up in time Sep 19 16:20:56 jackmitchell: huh, odd. Sep 19 16:21:15 jackmitchell: that should work... Sep 19 16:22:08 in fact I know there are distro configs that do it Sep 19 16:22:51 ah Sep 19 16:23:04 I am trying to add a specific license, rather than a flah Sep 19 16:23:09 s/flah/flag Sep 19 16:23:19 LICENSE = "netperf" Sep 19 16:23:19 LICENSE_FLAGS = "non-commercial" Sep 19 16:23:25 LICENSE_FLAGS_WHITELIST = "netperf" Sep 19 16:23:32 ah right, that's not the way it works Sep 19 16:23:36 is there a LICENSE_WHITELIST? Sep 19 16:23:38 LICENSE is defined in recipes, putting it in the config metadata won't do anything at all Sep 19 16:24:33 ok, so I would have non-commerical in my WHITELIST instead then Sep 19 16:25:02 jackmitchell: correct Sep 19 16:32:09 jackmitchell: I think you may be able to do LICENSE_FLAGS_WHITELIST += "non-commercial_netperf" to make it specific to that recipe if that's what you want as well Sep 19 16:32:38 ls Sep 19 16:32:39 oops Sep 19 16:39:47 /home/fray/porn Sep 19 16:39:51 /home/fray/porn-used-up Sep 19 16:39:57 /home/fray/porn-to-categorize Sep 19 16:40:04 /home/fray/porn-to-burn Sep 19 16:40:13 wow, you name your porn folder fray? Sep 19 16:40:26 not sure whether to be scared or flattered Sep 19 16:40:44 none of it was home made. Sep 19 16:40:54 so I surivived Sep 19 16:41:20 ha! Sep 19 16:41:26 * rburton shudders at "used-up" Sep 19 16:41:38 kidding! :) Sep 19 16:41:44 it's an old simpsons joke!! Sep 19 16:41:49 long week here! Sep 19 16:42:21 * zeddii goes back to hacking code, now that he has horrified the masses. Sep 19 16:42:44 zeddii: i'd google it.. but... Sep 19 16:43:26 rburton. yah, if you found the right thing, it is safe, but the other hits would be the problem Sep 19 16:43:42 moin Sep 19 16:43:46 * rburton used incognito mode Sep 19 16:43:58 can you tell I fought with python packaging for the morning, and have lost my mind now ? Sep 19 16:43:58 % Krusty laughs nervously as two happy garbage man dispose of his "used up Sep 19 16:44:00 % pornography" in their truck, and drive off, waving their hats. Sep 19 16:44:02 haha!!!! Sep 19 16:44:09 rburton, passes the test! Sep 19 16:44:35 adding the simpsons keyword helps somewhat Sep 19 16:45:11 rburton, that isn't filtered by the government over the pond yet .. is it ? :) Sep 19 16:45:42 zeddii: they've been talking about opt-out filters but the ISPs "aren't convinced" Sep 19 16:45:42 that would be the 'nanny state' right? ;) Sep 19 16:45:50 actually I missed what happened with that filtering stuff Sep 19 16:46:13 zeddii: http://aa.net.uk/kb-broadband-realinternet.html <-- my ISP kicks ass Sep 19 16:46:28 rburton: AA is awesome Sep 19 16:46:31 nice. Sep 19 16:46:37 * mr_science is just glad this morning's accident only involved two big-rigs Sep 19 16:46:43 rburton: they do ipv6 as well right? Sep 19 16:46:45 bluelightning_: they'd implement the filter that the government gave them *and them would add the daily mail* Sep 19 16:46:46 and a giant crane... Sep 19 16:46:56 we have a few around here that have also made stands. nice to see Sep 19 16:47:02 bluelightning_: yeah, i just missed out on a free router that actually does ipv6 correctly Sep 19 16:47:07 mr_science, sounds interesting Sep 19 16:47:23 the bus accident -> train here made all the news yesterday. even saw it linked from the BBC. Sep 19 16:47:58 * fray asked bout ipv6 when I had may ADSL upgraded to 'up to' 40 Mbps.. Sep 19 16:48:12 fray .. and you were told ? Sep 19 16:48:13 they kind of laughed and said they'll get around to it when enough people ask for it Sep 19 16:48:16 really. Sep 19 16:48:27 guess the states have all the ipv4 they need :P Sep 19 16:48:35 ya.. didn't take that as a positive sign about IPv6 deployment in my area Sep 19 16:48:48 they said they have some commercial customers that they route ipv6 to.. but not residential Sep 19 16:49:15 it's only been what, 15 years, that people are waiting for the big switch. Sep 19 16:49:39 everything I have is IPv6 capable.. I think it's the work router and the ISP that isn't Sep 19 16:49:54 (work router -might- be.. but our IT department would have to care) Sep 19 16:50:00 shame you don't work for a high tech company. Sep 19 16:50:02 * zeddii runs Sep 19 17:41:26 Hello Sep 19 17:42:26 I have a recipe which fetches an application from Git. When I update this application, I specify SRCREV for the latest commit. But it still fetches an old revision, even though I cleanall the recipe. Where could this be cached? Sep 19 17:47:07 Hey Stygia Sep 19 17:48:19 kspr, Whatcha write before I joined? Sep 19 17:48:33 kspr, Curious about your description of the problem. Sep 19 17:49:14 Stygia, I have a recipe which fetches an application from Git. When I update this application, I specify SRCREV for the latest commit. But it still fetches an old revision, even though I cleanall the recipe. Where could this be cached? Sep 19 17:50:42 Ye confirmed, this also happens frequently with the X-daemon recipe. Seems like BB somehow "remembers" a former revision and applies that one. Sep 19 17:50:47 Anyone else have any hints, maybe? Sep 19 17:51:06 hi, I have a question because this is getting beyond my league. :) Sep 19 17:51:59 lpapp, shoot :P Sep 19 17:51:59 I have a slightly modified software with having one more git commit. Then, I did the archive, and replaced that with the new for our recipe, but it still seems to build the old binary based upon the difference seen with vimdiff between the old and new. Any idea if I had left to clean up something, or something similar? Sep 19 17:52:44 also, the uncompressed source seems to be the unmodified. I cannot possibly understand that how. Sep 19 17:53:03 the "local" tarball put into the foo folder next to the recipe, is "downloaded" from there only once? Sep 19 17:53:16 and I should remove it from the downloads folder, or how exactly is this supposed to work? Sep 19 17:53:27 (using denzil if that matters) Sep 19 17:53:48 I have this downloads/foo.tar.xz.done Sep 19 17:55:51 lpapp, I guess you need to specify SRCREV, to be the id of the revision you want to fetch from Git. Sep 19 17:56:36 kspr: I am using git archive to get the tarball. Sep 19 17:56:40 and I just place it there. Sep 19 17:56:57 * lpapp is doing -c cleansstate Sep 19 18:05:03 i would use a standard git recipe and specify branch/tag or branch/hash Sep 19 18:05:38 no need for a tarball unless you have no connectivity to the git repo Sep 19 19:31:54 can Yocto use hg instead of git? Sep 19 19:32:28 bitbake supports fetching a ton of different protocols, git isn't in any way special there Sep 19 19:32:43 see https://github.com/openembedded/bitbake/tree/master/lib/bb/fetch2 Sep 19 20:13:06 kergoth: hi, i sent a mail to the bitbake list a while ago (several months actually :-(, i haven't had time to work on that unfortunately) about shell lexing in bitbake; rp pointed to you. could you take a look whenever you have time? http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/bitbake-devel/2013-May/003436.html Sep 19 20:13:38 I'll try to take a look today, but otherwise it'll be in a couple weeks, go on vacation tomorrow Sep 19 20:14:34 kergoth: thanks a lot. i have no problem waiting a couple of weeks more if you have other things to do :) Sep 19 20:15:17 we've worked around the issues by creating a bbcalc function, forking perl to do the arithmetics for the time being ;) Sep 19 20:16:35 but that made me stumble upon another issue; doing $(bbcalc 1+1) would result in a command not found error; i had to do bbcalc 1+1 >/dev/null to actually export the function. Sep 19 20:30:50 weird Sep 19 20:31:00 Trying to lex shell scripts to figure out what they do is Very Hard. Sep 19 20:31:06 indeed Sep 19 22:37:27 I have what I hope is a noob question -- I have a package that when going to compile, is attempting to "-L./" and it's tanking -- is there an obvious fix to this? It worked when I was building in a subdir of my home folder, but once I moved where I was doing the build (and built clean) it no longer works Sep 19 22:38:25 * mr_science wonders when they'll run out of "emergencies" Sep 19 22:46:09 previously it was: -L/home/brian/poky-dylan-9.0.1/yocto/cfa10057/tmp/sysroots/cfa10057/usr/lib/arm-poky-linux-gnueabi/4.8.1/ Sep 20 00:14:22 How would I add a toolchain to the target image? Sep 20 00:15:37 i think there's a conf option for that Sep 20 00:15:48 did you look in local.conf? Sep 20 00:16:13 I'll check Sep 20 00:20:19 yep you are right mr_science...should of checked there first thank you for the tip Sep 20 00:20:36 np Sep 20 00:30:47 time to bail... **** ENDING LOGGING AT Fri Sep 20 03:00:00 2013