**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Wed Jul 15 02:59:58 2015 Jul 15 06:18:17 is it possible to create meta packages for yocto? as in a package that just installs other packages? but is not a software/package it self? Jul 15 06:18:49 miandonmenmian there are package groups Jul 15 06:18:57 might be what you're looking for Jul 15 06:19:36 dvhart: sounds right, where do i look for more info about it? is it related to opkg? or just a recipe on yocto ? Jul 15 06:19:58 should be information in the reference manual Jul 15 06:20:40 http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/1.8/dev-manual/dev-manual.html#usingpoky-extend-customimage-customtasks Jul 15 06:20:44 try that Jul 15 06:24:28 dvhart: thanks! that's it Jul 15 06:24:39 welcome :) Jul 15 06:59:13 good morning Jul 15 07:17:58 hello Jul 15 07:18:17 it's me again Jul 15 07:20:14 I have the following module bb file http://dpaste.com/3FN8ZDC, but when the image is built, I don't see my modules in the lib filders Jul 15 07:20:19 what's wrong? Jul 15 07:56:53 and the second question: WARNING: QA Issue: /usr/bin/locale_glibc-external-utils contained in package glibc-external-utils requires libgcc_s.so.1, but no providers found in its RDEPENDS [file-rdeps] Jul 15 07:57:04 what does it mean? ^^^ Jul 15 08:02:00 morning all Jul 15 08:18:28 bluelightning: hey, I waited for you :) Jul 15 08:19:33 bluelightning: WARNING: QA Issue: Jul 15 08:19:33 /usr/bin/locale_glibc-external-utils contained in package Jul 15 08:19:33 glibc-external-utils requires libgcc_s.so.1, but no providers found in Jul 15 08:19:33 its RDEPENDS [file-rdeps] Jul 15 08:19:38 oops Jul 15 08:19:44 morning all Jul 15 08:20:34 Ox4: http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/current/ref-manual/ref-manual.html#qa-issue-file-rdeps Jul 15 08:22:10 morning bluelightning Jul 15 08:22:26 bluelightning: ok, another quiestion Jul 15 08:22:47 bluelightning: I have the following module bb file http://dpaste.com/3FN8ZDC Jul 15 08:22:57 but I don't see my modules in the lib filder Jul 15 08:43:05 is there a tool that I can use to quickly deploy contents of ${D} to a target host? something line devtool's deploy-target Jul 15 08:49:34 bboozzoo: devtool deploy-target is basically what we have for that Jul 15 08:50:44 bluelightning: but that does not work with out-of-workspace recipes right? Jul 15 08:58:02 bboozzoo: no, but adding a recipe to the workspace is trivial, just do devtool modify recipename Jul 15 08:58:24 (which doesn't actually move or even touch the recipe itself, in case that's not clear) Jul 15 09:07:31 seems like itl'll do :) Jul 15 09:09:22 where the IMAGE_LINGUAS and GLIBC_GENERATE_LOCALES variable should be located? Jul 15 09:09:23 bluelightning: btw. devtool is really nice, cograts on making the yocto experience much better Jul 15 09:09:30 build/conf/local.conf? Jul 15 09:15:06 bboozzoo: thanks, if you think of any improvements, please let us know :) Jul 15 09:15:35 Ox4: you can set them from local.conf, but long term you should be thinking about creating your own custom distro config and setting it from there Jul 15 09:15:44 Ox4: there's a section of the manual on creating your own distro Jul 15 09:16:03 morning all. Is it possible to use psplash withot fbcon activated in kernel? Jul 15 09:16:14 mine stopped working when I disabled fbcon. Jul 15 09:16:15 thanks. Jul 15 09:23:09 Ox4: for example meta-ivi sets it in ivi-image https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-ivi/tree/meta-ivi/recipes-yocto-ivi/images/ivi-image.inc Jul 15 09:24:19 right, IMAGE_LINGUAS can (and probably should) be set from a custom image recipe Jul 15 09:24:28 GLIBC_GENERATE_LOCALES cannot be though Jul 15 09:28:27 thank you guys Jul 15 09:30:08 could somebody support me with meta-sourcery? Jul 15 09:36:32 http://dpaste.com/1KCTSJW.txt omg :-( Jul 15 09:37:03 not me, I always use our built-from-source toolchain Jul 15 09:38:43 mansandersson: I don't believe so Jul 15 09:38:59 mansandersson: if you look at psplash's code it's pretty trivial, there's not much in the way of output options built in Jul 15 09:42:29 bluelightning: I'm looking at it right now and it seems to me that it wants a raw access to the fb device. If that's true it should work from my understanding (got a lot to read up on regarding fb though) Jul 15 09:43:08 mansandersson: you're at the limit of my knowledge as well I'm afraid Jul 15 09:45:20 bluelightning: I'll just continue my search then. Thanks anyway Jul 15 09:55:49 hm, I don't see modules which should be built :-( Jul 15 10:11:50 other toolchains should work in theory, but they are always a pain in the neck. Jul 15 11:06:26 bitbake no longer prints content of log.* files for failed tasks by default? was that intentional change? Jul 15 11:18:45 JaMa: no, bugfix is on the list Jul 15 11:18:49 my fault :/ Jul 15 11:19:04 I hope it should get merged soon Jul 15 11:19:52 I'll have a couple of follow-up fixes for bbfatal usage in meta-oe as well Jul 15 11:21:16 ok, thanks for info Jul 15 12:59:52 Hey all, I'm building with the yocto poky (dizzy) project a small linux for my beagle bone black. Jul 15 13:00:10 Its working fine with dylan and the meta-beaglebone layer and also with dizzy without this layer. Jul 15 13:00:42 My simple question is how can I configure yocto that way it compiles me another kernel version? Jul 15 13:02:39 At the moment I get 3.8.13 with my dylan project and with fido I get 3.14.36. Jul 15 13:07:18 HyP3r: kernel is selected through PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel = "" (and also PREFERRED_VERSION_ = "" ) Jul 15 13:08:32 you'd need to add a recipe providing the version of the kernel you want to be built, and set those to point to it (if there's only one version of that then you don't need to set PREFERRED_VERSION_ though) Jul 15 13:09:38 bluelightning: ugh that sounds complicated Jul 15 13:10:50 it's not really ;) Jul 15 13:12:31 In first step I grepped: meta-yocto-bsp/conf/machine/beaglebone.conf:PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel ?= "linux-yocto" Jul 15 13:12:52 And now? Jul 15 13:13:06 HyP3r: many recipes has include files (.inc) that does all the hard work and you only have to provide the git repo and sha. Jul 15 13:13:57 In this file meta-yocto-bsp/conf/machine/beaglebone.conf under this line is: PREFERRED_VERSION_linux-yocto ?= "3.14%" Jul 15 13:14:03 Would I work if I change that line? Jul 15 13:14:50 yes, as long as you have a recipe for that version (look in recipes-kernel/linux) Jul 15 13:15:23 I only have 3.14 and 3.19 Jul 15 13:15:58 So in that way I have to create a new recipe? Jul 15 13:17:19 yes, if you'd like to build something else than 3.14 or 3.19 Jul 15 13:18:42 if all you want is to make changes to the kernel configuration you can also try "bitbake -c menuconfig virtual/kernel" Jul 15 13:19:14 HyP3r: normally you wouldn't edit that file, you would set the value elsewhere in your configuration Jul 15 13:21:06 bluelightning: how can I find out which file is included? Where I can set the config? Jul 15 13:22:05 But I think to create a new kernel recipie is not a bad Idea beacause there is git-fork for the beaglebone black Jul 15 13:22:18 Which is Including the beagle bone black specific functions Jul 15 13:22:29 HyP3r: for testing you can set it in conf/local.conf under your build directory Jul 15 13:22:40 https://github.com/beagleboard/linux Jul 15 13:22:50 HyP3r: bitbake -e | less is a good way to explore how variables get set (and what config files are read) Jul 15 13:26:07 bluelightning: thank you Jul 15 14:26:22 dvhart: around? just wondering what's the right way to refresh my memory on the -tiny effort? Jul 15 14:29:00 hi.. is it possible to create a rpm/ipk containing packages that should not be included in image? i mean one ikp containing all packages to install manually? Jul 15 14:30:10 ericbutters: er, do you mean a packagegroup perhaps ? Jul 15 14:31:24 bluelightning: yes some kind of that.. i created a packagegroup, but this builds all packages and i can find them seperately in tmp/deploy/ipk .. but i want to have all of them in one ikp Jul 15 14:31:30 ipk i meant Jul 15 14:31:50 well, we have no mechanism to create a megapackage from individual packages, no Jul 15 14:32:27 ericbutters: you *could* have a recipe that depends on the deploy of your set of packages, and creates the megapackage and deploys that Jul 15 14:33:04 rburton: how to do this? Jul 15 14:33:06 sry Jul 15 14:34:47 i imagine something like do_unpack['depends'] += "some-package:do_deploy another-package:do_deploy" would work Jul 15 14:35:16 that means you'll only get past unpack once those packages have deployed themselves as binary packages Jul 15 14:35:39 ah Jul 15 14:35:41 then you'd have to map the dependency to the exact binary package filename.. Jul 15 14:35:41 okay i try Jul 15 14:35:43 names, that is Jul 15 14:35:45 then write a do_install to unpack all of the packages to $D together, and re-package them Jul 15 14:35:48 * kergoth yawns, morning all Jul 15 14:35:54 kergoth: yeah, and that Jul 15 14:36:12 (totally not saying this is a good idea) Jul 15 14:36:23 i dare not ask why :) Jul 15 14:36:39 my guess would be he wants to install something with a lot of deps bu tdoesn't have a feed set up Jul 15 14:37:17 the right answer to that is, set up a feed, even a temporary one, i think.. or write a standalone tool which copies a package and its deps from a feed to a target path (e.g. sd card or usb stick) Jul 15 14:37:18 * kergoth shrugs Jul 15 14:38:58 kergoth: i never used feeds, can feeds be on a usb stick? how to create feeds? Jul 15 14:39:40 yes, you could put a package feed on a usb stick. it depends on the package manager, they each have an appropriate tool for creating a feed / updating the feed metadata from the packages in it Jul 15 14:40:57 i find all packages in tmp/deploy/ipk .. so how to create a feed from that with packages i want to provide? Jul 15 15:37:38 bluelightning: do I need some oe-core patch together with this one? http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/97489/ Jul 15 15:38:10 http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/97289/ maybe? Jul 15 15:39:11 which doesn't apply, because it's already there :) Jul 15 15:51:08 JaMa: you should take all of http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/97507/ , though strictly only 2/4 and 3/4 are required to make things work properly again Jul 15 15:53:02 should probably get those messaging fixes in relatively quickly Jul 15 15:55:39 lovely, yesterday my unit tests were fine, today i'm getting random parse hangs again. gah. i don't know if it's something with these VMs, the machine they're running on, or something bitbake related Jul 15 15:55:46 :| Jul 15 15:56:08 bluelightning: trying that now.. Jul 15 15:57:19 I haven't seen breakage due to the issue fixed by 1/4 but I'd expect there to be some Jul 15 16:01:10 bluelightning: nice work on the messaging stuff, by the way, that's a feature we've wanted since early days of oe Jul 15 16:01:43 kergoth: thanks... I now appreciate why noone got around to implementing it until now ;) Jul 15 16:01:51 hah :) Jul 15 16:02:21 i didn't even think about the showing vs not showing the log aspect until i saw your fixes for it. didn't even cross my mind after reading the first patches.. Jul 15 16:03:13 right, nor me (and I may have written the log suppressing code ...) Jul 15 16:04:00 one remaining annoying thing though is that if you Ctrl+C out of the build, the FIFOs get left behind - I guess the worker is being terminated before it has a chance to unlink it Jul 15 16:05:19 guess the workers need to catch whatever signal the server is sending to shut them down and do some cleanup? Jul 15 16:05:20 * kergoth shrugs Jul 15 16:05:47 * kergoth grumbles Jul 15 16:14:13 bluelightning: thanks worked, now I can see that intltool-native is broken Jul 15 16:14:15 | checking for perl >= 5.8.1... 5.22.0 Jul 15 16:14:15 | checking for XML::Parser... configure: error: XML::Parser perl module is required for intltool Jul 15 16:14:18 | Configure failed. The contents of all config.log files follows to aid debugging Jul 15 16:37:48 How can I remove a REPDENDS package from one recipe but in another recipe, a image recipe for instance? Jul 15 16:38:32 The thing is that packagegroup-core-boot.bb installs init-ifupdown package, but I don't want it to install in one image, but it can install in another image. Jul 15 16:38:51 Since it doesn't use any type of DISTRO_FEATURE or anything, it always install. Jul 15 16:39:17 can't be done. packagegroup-core-boot emits a binary package, that package is installed in any image you build Jul 15 16:39:27 one recipe can't alter another recipe's metadata Jul 15 16:39:43 either do two builds with different cofniguration, or use multiple packagegroups Jul 15 16:39:58 Ok, thats what I though. Jul 15 16:40:24 Is there any reason why init-ifupdown package is installed in this packagegroup? Jul 15 16:40:45 I mean, why not use some network DISTRO_FEATURE to select it? Jul 15 16:40:59 i don't think networking has ever been optional Jul 15 16:41:07 you could certainly create such a distro feature, yeah Jul 15 16:47:30 ok Jul 15 18:32:06 * kergoth swipes the logging bits from bb.tests.data for selftests Jul 15 19:20:47 I clearly don't write unit tests often enough, this is taking me much longer than it should Jul 15 19:20:52 course the random parse hangs don't help, but still Jul 15 20:06:56 * kergoth finds a number of irritating issues with the bb.fetch.URI class Jul 15 23:44:38 more success! **** ENDING LOGGING AT Thu Jul 16 02:59:59 2015