**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Tue Mar 08 02:59:59 2016 Mar 08 08:10:52 hi all Mar 08 08:11:15 is there any plan to release jethro with security fixes only as tarball? Mar 08 08:11:37 I can see that on git jethro branch has many fixes but available release is still 14.0.0. Mar 08 08:19:56 Hi marek_ Mar 08 08:21:53 mranostay: hi Mar 08 08:40:12 marek_: 2.0.1 was going through final approval last night, so expect it to be released today/tomorrow Mar 08 08:40:42 a series of badly timed CVEs and infrastructure problems meant it went through seven release candidate builds Mar 08 08:43:38 rburton: ok many thanks Mar 08 09:44:49 Is there some way to override the SRC_URI checksums for a recipe via local.conf? I.e., if I specify the version of a recipe using PV_pn-myrecipe = "1.2.3" in local.conf I typically also need to specify the corresponding checksums. However, the naive approach SRC_URI_pn-myrecipe[md5sum] = "123abc..." does not seem to work... Mar 08 09:48:25 Saur: can't you use a bbappend? Mar 08 09:49:54 CTtpollard: Well, I could, but then I could modify the recipe as well. This is about doing overrides without the option of modifying the actual layers. Mar 08 10:09:33 rburton: sorry i missed your comment yesterday. I did not get a confirmation email. Mar 08 10:17:18 rburton: and when I send a patch to the list I only get "Your message to linux-yocto awaits moderator approval" Mar 08 10:46:27 I've just enabled read only root filesystem. I'm using dpkg and systemd but the dpkg-configure.service has failed. After investigating it's the ExecStartPost that has failed as it tries to disable the service and I get a 'Failed to execute operation: Read-only file system' message. Anyone know how I can fix this? Mar 08 11:06:21 http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime.inc?id=5db535a91edea439c14e75726acd23e64bb1e2ea changed LICENSE_libgomp to GPLv3, but libgomp actually also seems to have the runtime exception Mar 08 11:06:34 At least that's what Debian thinks, and what https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/master/libgomp/libgomp.h#L17 says Mar 08 11:06:42 Is this a bug? [Y/n] Mar 08 11:14:47 Looks like systemctl disable just updates some symlinks from /etc/systemd/system to disable the service. Will hack service file to remount as rw and then disable service and then remount ro, unless there's a cleaner way? Mar 08 11:24:02 neverpanic: sound like it Mar 08 11:37:12 rburton: want me to file a ticket? Mar 08 11:41:00 please Mar 08 12:03:02 Hi all. How can i get bitbake to build a package containing no sources? basically i want a meta package containing my top level dependencies so i can easily add / remove packages with a simple upgrade Mar 08 12:03:28 Anticom: sounds like you want a packagegroup? Mar 08 12:04:25 neverpanic: looks exactly like what i was looking for. thank's! Mar 08 12:18:53 rburton: https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9228 Mar 08 12:18:55 Bug 9228: normal, Undecided, ---, paul.eggleton, NEW , libgomp license is misrepresented in gcc-runtime recipes Mar 08 12:35:56 Is rpm+smart considered well tested in yocto? Mar 08 12:36:02 with yocto* Mar 08 12:40:15 Anticom: yes, what do you want use for? Mar 08 12:41:34 ftonello: what it's meant for: runtime package management :] Mar 08 12:41:38 nothing fancy Mar 08 12:42:02 So, just use it. Mar 08 12:42:04 I'm just looking at the alternatives. Our product is released soon so we have to make a decision Mar 08 12:42:54 Anticom: I don't think there is any alternative as well integrated and tested than smart. Mar 08 12:43:08 But there are other sutff, specially in meta-oe. Mar 08 12:43:11 opkg is tested every day afaik Mar 08 12:43:20 during the nightly builds Mar 08 12:43:26 Come one, come all! http://openembedded.org/wiki/OEDAM_2016 Mar 08 12:43:30 Yes, but you means smart, not the package format. Mar 08 12:43:43 you meant* Mar 08 12:43:50 i asked for rpm+smart, not only smart ;) Mar 08 12:44:11 angstrom uses ipk, so thats rather well tested too Mar 08 12:44:24 windriver afaik uses rpm, so its probably tested too. Mar 08 12:44:34 Anticom: Yes, for opkg you should use ipk. Mar 08 12:44:48 Btw is there a number on the savings when using e.g. opkg over rpm? (are we talking kilobytes / megabytes?) Mar 08 12:44:52 debian uses dpkg/deb, so that has certainly seen some testing too. Mar 08 12:45:04 LetoThe2nd: in conjunction with yocto? Mar 08 12:45:04 I've been using smart+rpm since it was released them both in oe-core, I believe in 2013. Mar 08 12:45:17 i personally can't recommend anything, because for my usecases target package management is pointless. Mar 08 12:45:51 i just heard that dpkg is poorly tested with yocto compared to the others Mar 08 12:46:03 rburton to the rescue! Mar 08 12:46:07 :) Mar 08 12:46:29 I think most people use rpm+smart. That's my guess. Mar 08 12:46:51 Anticom: removing package management from the target saves you the most ;-) Mar 08 12:47:01 Hi everyone! I try to build a C++ app using a Yocto-Recipe. I got the following error "ld: cannot find -lstdc++ -lm -lc" I guess I just have to add the add the correct thing to the DEPENDS variable? I am running Angstrom 2014.12/Yocto 1.7 Mar 08 12:47:19 LetoThe2nd: but we actually want it ;) Mar 08 12:48:06 Anticom: Try all your ooptions and drive the conclusion yourself. It's usually the best approach since it can depend on each use-case. Mar 08 12:48:22 Spice: maybe your build script also isn't crosscompile aware? Mar 08 12:48:45 Spice: What are you using to build your source code? autotools, pure makefile, cmake? Mar 08 12:48:59 Yes, its a pure makefile Mar 08 12:49:28 Spice: You probably want to use pkg-config with it in order to properly find the libraries paths, cflags and so on. Mar 08 12:49:55 Spice: my first advice would be the to use a build system that properly handles that stuff. autotools, cmake, for example Mar 08 12:50:18 Spice: otherwise you'll quickly end up manually fixing each and every single use case. Mar 08 12:51:06 (i know its nboring, but it pays off quickly) Mar 08 12:53:19 Thanks for the quick replies! I will have a look at pkg-config then. Mar 08 13:35:41 Anticom, LetoThe2nd: apt/dpkg is obviously used by debian, but we're not debian so there may be problems. autobuilder doesn't exercise it as much as rpm/smart and opkg. Mar 08 13:36:50 rburton: thank's that's about what i remembered Mar 08 13:37:11 rburton: Do you know by accident, what the actual savings in memory are, when using opkg instead of rpm+smart? Mar 08 13:37:45 not off hand Mar 08 13:37:49 for a start "no python" Mar 08 13:37:51 are we talking a few kilobytes or even megabytes (since there's no python etc. needed= Mar 08 13:37:52 so that's a serious saving Mar 08 13:38:23 but if you want to use and support a package feed, smart+rpm is likely superior Mar 08 13:40:13 python executable itself is only 3.6K ..that seems odd Mar 08 13:42:58 rburton: ah kay Mar 08 13:43:53 3.4MB on my debian box Mar 08 13:44:12 thank's Mar 08 13:44:46 oh yeah 11k in OE Mar 08 13:44:58 of course unlike debian it links to libpython.so Mar 08 13:45:05 libpython is about 1.5M Mar 08 13:45:18 and i guess there's some more cluttered stuff Mar 08 13:45:26 isn't that already larger than opkg? Mar 08 13:45:27 i guess 2-3 MB sounds about realistic Mar 08 13:45:35 mborzecki: vastly Mar 08 13:45:41 mborzecki: I just wanted an estimate for my report (: Mar 08 13:45:47 to get some 'hard' soft numbers Mar 08 13:45:48 mhm :) Mar 08 13:46:00 Anticom: get real numbers: build your image with package_rpm and then again with package_ipk Mar 08 13:46:23 (PACKAGE_CLASSES, in local.conf) Mar 08 14:48:04 Hi Mar 08 14:48:25 i'm looking for guide for submiting patch Mar 08 14:49:04 ramos: http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Commit_Patch_Message_Guidelines Mar 08 14:49:24 mario-goulart: great ! thx Mar 08 14:49:29 Also the README files in the layers you are targetting your patch at. Mar 08 14:49:43 yw Mar 08 15:22:08 mario-goulart: I couldn't find any information in what format it should be sent on mailing list Mar 08 15:30:31 ramos: git send-email, ideally Mar 08 15:31:08 ramos: http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/How_to_submit_a_patch_to_OpenEmbedded Mar 08 15:34:49 otavio: I wonder why meta-fsl-arm/recipes-graphics/piglit/piglit_git.bbappend check for x11 in DISTRO_FEATURES and if not it checks for wayland, the oe-core recipe for piglit requires x11 in DISTRO_FEATURES to be always included Mar 08 15:35:09 otavio: so the whole else part is useless or I'm missing some trick to build piglit without x11 Mar 08 15:59:32 YPTM: Ready-Access Number: 8007302996/9139049836 Access Code: 2705751 Mar 08 15:59:37 YPTM: Stephen Joined Mar 08 16:00:18 YPTM: Saul's on for a change Mar 08 16:01:00 YPTM: belen and josh joined Mar 08 16:01:28 YPTM: maxin joined Mar 08 16:01:32 YPTM: RP joined Mar 08 16:01:33 YPTM: sona joined Mar 08 16:01:35 YPTM: I have an open. A quick mention about Hob's removal Mar 08 16:03:21 Don't forget to mention OEDAM in San Diego. I ahve an email about to go out Mar 08 16:03:32 Hi everyone, i decided build an image for myarmboard with included apache2, My source file has included meta-webserver/apache2, how can i append this recipes to build process , Can i do anything or i run this commadn: bitbake var-image-qt5 Mar 08 16:04:53 ka6sox, look for the variable IMAGE_INSTALL in the yocto documentation, it should answer your question Mar 08 16:05:14 ^ / ka6sox / kageja (sorry) Mar 08 16:06:42 :) Mar 08 16:06:59 boucman_work: you know link or this is short answer, you may give ^_^ Mar 08 16:08:00 kageja, http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/1.8/mega-manual/mega-manual.html#var-IMAGE_INSTALL Mar 08 16:08:47 YPTM is over Mar 08 16:16:28 boucman_work: ok i see, but what is my package-name ? i append apache2 to IMAGE_INSTALL Mar 08 16:16:54 I don't remember exactly gimme a sec Mar 08 16:18:33 boucman_work: ok i m waiting ^_ ^_^ no problem : Mar 08 16:18:35 :) Mar 08 16:21:53 hmm, there is no easy command to know the name of a package from the name of a recipe name Mar 08 16:22:12 but they usually are called the same, so try " appache2" and tell me what happens Mar 08 16:23:19 boucman_work: thats good idea but there is one thing, The compiling process take long timee such as one day two day, so ihave to one shoot Mar 08 16:23:27 boucman_work: thats good idea but there is one thing, The compiling process take long timee such as one day two day, so ihave to do one shoot Mar 08 16:23:41 kageja, boucman_work: oe-pkgdata-util list-pkgs -p python will list all the runtime packages produced by python Mar 08 16:23:57 (assuming you've built python already) Mar 08 16:24:14 another yocto command I didn't know, awesome :) Mar 08 16:24:15 so bitbake apache2; oe-pkgdata-util list-pkgs -p apache2 Mar 08 16:25:32 rburton: bitbake apache2 this command produce apache package, and package format is bbappend or rpm ? and second commad: oe-pkgdata-util list-pkgs -p apache2 what do it do ? Mar 08 16:25:58 rburton, that's an awesome command to add to my tool list Mar 08 16:28:51 oe-pkgdata-util this command is undefine on my host computer Mar 08 16:29:17 it'll only be available in the terminal that sourced the setup script, the same one that run bitbake Mar 08 16:33:30 huh, wonder if https://developer.github.com/changes/2016-02-24-commit-reference-sha-api/ is easier on the server than ls-remote. (via https://github.com/CocoaPods/CocoaPods/issues/4989#issuecomment-193772935, as mentioned by Crofton|work) Mar 08 16:38:55 rburton: boucman_work: bitbake apache2 command returned ERROR: Nothing PROVIDES 'apache2' Mar 08 16:40:25 it should... Mar 08 16:40:37 did you add meta-webserver to you bblayer.conf ? Mar 08 16:41:45 * armpit pokes self in eye Mar 08 16:44:37 boucman_work: yes you are amazing i think it shhoul be work Mar 08 16:45:13 not amazing, just felt in the most common traps before you :P Mar 08 16:45:23 boucman_work: there is a way for installing tomcat7 like this ? Mar 08 16:45:31 dunno Mar 08 16:45:40 http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/recipes/?q=tomcat Mar 08 16:45:50 (not yet) Mar 08 16:46:02 was about to point to that url :P Mar 08 16:46:51 rburton: im unhappy okey if i want install tomcat7, how can i do it ? Mar 08 16:47:34 kageja: either install it by hand, or write a recipe to build it yourself Mar 08 16:49:21 rburton: writing a recipe? :) im newbiee in this eco system and im writing low level driver for stm freescale nxp mcu :) i think i have no time :) Mar 08 16:58:36 rburton: boucman_work: i build apache2 rpm package but its needed libapr-1.so.0 libaprutil-1.so.0 , etc ? Mar 08 16:59:14 il should do all that for you, including installing on the image Mar 08 17:00:02 boucman_work: you mean, you build image completly instead of buildin apache2 package ? Mar 08 17:00:22 when you build apache2 package, it builds all dependencies for you Mar 08 17:00:38 when you build an image that includes apache2 it will install all dependencies for you Mar 08 17:01:14 boucman_work: but i build apache2 package, but there is no dependincie package ? Mar 08 17:01:39 i don't understand your question Mar 08 17:03:32 boucman_work: 1--> i run this command : bitbake apache2; 2--> i copied building rpm package to my armboard 3--> i run this command o my armboard: rpm -Uv apache2-2.4.10.blabla.rpm and i take error: failed dependencies Mar 08 17:05:02 well, all dependencies are built, and if you rebuild the image they will be installed on that image Mar 08 17:05:14 if you install the rpm manually, you have to install them manually Mar 08 17:05:41 they are generated somewhere in tmp/deploy/rpm but since I don't know what those dependencies are, i can't really help you find them Mar 08 17:06:54 boucman_work: ok i see, you mean yocto already build another image and i must find him ? Mar 08 17:07:32 no Mar 08 17:08:05 it built the other rpm you need, but if you install manually on your board (like you said) then you also need to manually install the dependencies Mar 08 17:47:51 boucman_work: rburton: so so so many thanks for your helping :) finally i installed apache2, finding dependencies is hard but receipes is so amazing :) Mar 08 17:48:43 boucman_work: rburton: now i want to install tomcat 5.5 mysql and java, i found java in meta-java layer but i didnt find mysql recioes Mar 08 17:48:49 *recipes **** ENDING LOGGING AT Wed Mar 09 02:59:58 2016