**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Sun Mar 20 02:59:58 2016
Mar 20 15:45:56 <zero_note> hi folks, I've just removed alsa-utils from my IMAGE_INSTALL but alsa-utils stuff is still present in my images
Mar 20 15:47:33 <zero_note> what I have forgotten?
Mar 20 15:48:14 <zero_note> is something related to package/config cache?
Mar 20 19:07:07 <Herrie> zero_note: Could be some other recipe is still refering to it in DEPENDS, RDEPENDS or RRECOMMENDS?
Mar 20 19:08:28 <kergoth> zero_note: most likely you still have alsa in DISTRO_FEATURES, so it's being pulled in by packagegroup-base.
Mar 20 19:09:00 <zero_note> Herrie: I've just checked and nothing *depends or *recommeds on it
Mar 20 19:09:47 <zero_note> kergoth: you're right, so I have added MACHINE_FEATURES_remove = "alsa" in my machine.conf
Mar 20 19:10:22 <kergoth> bitbake -g is often helpful for determining why something is being pulled in
Mar 20 19:10:59 <zero_note> and DISTRO_FEATURES_remove = "alsa" in my local.conf, now a new build in clean dir is running, but from the compile logs I've just read "alsa-lib-native-...."
Mar 20 19:12:27 <zero_note> kergoth: yep, indeed reading dot files from bitbake -g alsa-utils I've found that packagegroup-base pull on alsa-utils
Mar 20 19:14:27 <zero_note> Herrie: kergoth: thanks for the response :-)
Mar 20 22:00:32 <paulg_> WARNING: gst-plugins-good-0.10.31-r8 do_configure: QA Issue: gst-plugins-good: configure was passed unrecognised options: --disable-introspection [unknown-configure-option]
Mar 20 22:01:12 <paulg_> with the introspection stubs being replaced recently, I'm guessing we just don't need that option (not that it worked anyway)
Mar 20 22:08:04 <RP> halstead: not sure why but fedora22 is being very slow again :(
Mar 20 22:08:44 <RP> paulg_: it might be a sign that you need the workaround discussed on list (delete the .m4 files it ships with so it gets our version)
Mar 20 22:13:30 <paulg_> RP, I'll have a look...
Mar 20 22:37:21 <paulg_> RP, so there was one, and I clobbered it in a preconfigure, then the build gets the sysroot one...
Mar 20 22:37:27 <paulg_> 0.10.31-r8#ls -l ./build/aclocal-copy/introspection.m4
Mar 20 22:37:27 <paulg_> lrwxrwxrwx 1 1000 pulse 83 Mar 20 18:32 ./build/aclocal-copy/introspection.m4 -> /home/paul/poky/build/tmp/sysroots/genericx86-64/usr/share/aclocal/introspection.m4
Mar 20 22:37:27 <paulg_> 0.10.31-r8#
Mar 20 22:38:20 <paulg_> but the warning remains.   Seems it is because both m4 expects "--enable-introspection=no"  -- they don't grok "--disable-introspection"
Mar 20 22:38:46 <RP> paulg: It should accept --disable too
Mar 20 22:38:58 <paulg_> odd.
Mar 20 22:53:29 <RP> halstead: is fedora22 using xfs and is that our only builder using xfs? Its tied in knots and I can't even login to an interactive shell atm. All I can see is a kernel worker process using 100% cpu. I'm suspecting the filesystem being crossed up :(
Mar 20 22:58:49 <halstead> RP, Centos7 is also XFS.
Mar 20 23:00:26 <RP> halstead: hmm, so it could be something else :/. Regardless, it doesn't seem happy :(
**** ENDING LOGGING AT Mon Mar 21 02:59:58 2016