**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Wed May 31 03:00:04 2017 May 31 06:31:09 morning all May 31 06:47:16 is there any layers with an up to date chromium anywhere? May 31 06:47:38 I'm mostly interested because I want pdfium, and it has switched from gyp to gn, which is a pain to build, so I'm wondering how to do that best May 31 06:48:05 meta-browser seems to be stuck at chromium 54 May 31 07:01:07 I've created a new machine.conf based on var-som-mx6.conf. Can I in my .bbappend do something like: do_install_append_mymachine = do_install_append_var-som-mx6 ? May 31 07:03:21 There are some SRCREV/SRCBRANCH/do_compile steps where I want to do the same as var-som-mx6, and not have to remember to monitor upstream changes. May 31 07:07:11 Hello May 31 07:07:29 does anybody know how I can fix the warning about the Proprietary licence ? May 31 07:12:39 @top22 you can put LICENSE=CLOSED in the recipe of the package you are building May 31 07:13:18 @top22 only if you are sure no law is broke by not respecting some legal stuff May 31 07:13:33 ... broken May 31 07:48:31 Good Morning! May 31 07:52:47 good morning May 31 08:27:05 Hi there, I'm looking for build an UI for my linux image on zybo, I want to use Qt, but don't know where to begin to use Qt with yocto. Could you point me to some doc where begin ? May 31 08:29:18 yohboy: i guess the current new sh** is b2qt, which seems to be nicely documented by the qt people themselves May 31 08:30:05 yohboy: otherwise, add meta-qt5(?) and look for some example on how to set up qtcreator with the toolchain. May 31 08:32:01 yohboy: I'm not an expert but that ^ would be the first decision IMO: do you want to use boot-to-QT or just add the required layers to your existing build May 31 08:32:44 http://doc.qt.io/QtForDeviceCreation/qtee-custom-embedded-linux-image.html May 31 08:33:28 LetoThe2nd,jku, if just add the required layers (meta-qt5) if enough to allow me to build a GUI for my image, I think it's fine for me May 31 08:33:57 is enough* May 31 08:34:01 yohboy: it should be enough, its more about how much additional magic you desiere May 31 08:34:32 so boot2QT is magic ? May 31 08:34:44 and meta-qt5 harder ? May 31 08:36:04 yohboy: ore magic in term of http://doc.qt.io/QtForDeviceCreation/qtee-custom-embedded-linux-image.html#configuring-qt-creator May 31 08:38:01 LetoThe2nd: Ok, but I do not necessarily need QtCreator ? Or it is required ? May 31 08:38:32 yohboy: well *necessarily* you need nothing besides butterflies. May 31 08:38:57 https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/real_programmers.png May 31 08:40:02 ok :') May 31 08:40:37 So I'll look futher meta-qt5 and boot2Qt before make my choice ! May 31 08:40:40 thank you May 31 08:42:12 Anyone tried meta-qt5 with pyro release ? May 31 08:49:15 when we do "bitbake -e", it show the " final " file which will be parsed ? I mean, if i have .bb and .bbappend, the "bitbake -e" should show the resulting of fusioning both? May 31 08:51:05 ChrysD: yes. May 31 08:53:13 LetoThe2nd : thanks :( May 31 08:53:50 Hi, I have a recipe that use bluetooth and the package is building fine, but the native SDK fails to find bluetooth.h, any ideas how to get the bluetooth headers in the native SDKs May 31 09:10:11 LetoThe2nd : it seems like my bbappend have no action... My bbappend follow the same source tree as the .bb ( except in other meta obviously ) May 31 09:10:30 LetoThe2nd : And my meta is ofcourse added in bblayers May 31 09:16:45 LetoThe2nd : and i'm sure it's parsed because when i intentionnaly do an error i get :ParseError at /opt/PHYTEC_BSPs/phyBOARD-MIRA/sources/poky/../meta-seb/recipes-bsp/barebox/barebox_2016.11.0-phy4.bbappend:6: Shell function do_env_append_phyboard-mira-imx is never closed May 31 09:25:55 ChrysD: sounds like it gets parsed by bitbake, but not applied. you did triple check naming? May 31 09:26:34 ChrysD: and bitbake-layers show-appends? May 31 09:33:51 LetoThe2nd : I have already done bitbake-layers show-appends May 31 09:33:57 LetoThe2nd : and it's listed May 31 09:34:28 LetoThe2nd : the only thing i'm doing on my bbappend is overwriting a python function May 31 09:34:31 ChrysD: then probably something *in* your append is not correct. can you place it in a pastebin? May 31 09:36:24 LetoThe2nd : I have exactly copy paste the same function as the .bb and just changed some lines which have been commented and I put it uncommented May 31 09:36:27 LetoThe2nd : https://pastebin.com/enjuBnsq May 31 09:37:16 hmhm. May 31 09:39:01 LetoThe2nd : I don't think that it changes something, but in case my bbappend is in a layer with the highest priority. May 31 09:39:50 my gut feeling says it has something to do with evaluation order, but that can be totally wrong too. May 31 09:40:03 bluelightning: ^^^^^ you certainly can comment here :) May 31 09:40:16 LetoThe2nd : and i'm sure that i'm appending the good version of barebox May 31 09:40:31 LetoThe2nd : thx BTW May 31 09:48:12 LetoThe2nd : i tested to overwrite another python function and seems to work May 31 09:49:11 LetoThe2nd : Quite weird that i can't overwrite the python function i would like to May 31 09:50:07 ChrysD: i suspect some combination of expansion time, function name evaluation and such to coincident. but its really way too deep in the python parts for me. May 31 09:51:01 LetoThe2nd : ok thx May 31 09:55:04 LetoThe2nd : it seems to work now May 31 09:55:19 LetoThe2nd : I will test first May 31 09:57:03 LetoThe2nd : according to bitbake -e it works, i forgot to put a space between my name function and the brackets May 31 10:02:35 LetoThe2nd : It works ! May 31 10:31:28 Hi, I have a question regarding bitbake. Assuming I have 5 layers and each of the 5 layers have a .bbappend (one of them has the .bb file) and each of the five .bbappend has patches. In what order will the patching be done ? How does bitbake decide the patching order ? May 31 10:31:53 the .bbappend file is for the same packages May 31 10:32:40 *package May 31 10:55:20 Anoop165: well, it depends on how those recipes add their patches to SRC_URI May 31 10:55:36 Anoop165: but let's assume that they all use _append or += May 31 10:57:19 in which case they would be applied in ascending layer priority order May 31 10:57:57 (i.e. the same order in which the bbappend contents themselves are appended to the recipe) May 31 11:05:33 Seems a lot of devkits keep uImage/dtb in a vfat boot partition and do fatload from u-boot. Is there a good reason not to add it to the rootfs and load it from there instead? May 31 11:15:11 tasslehoff: depends. not all bootloaders can mount/access the rootfs. May 31 11:15:28 tasslehoff: think ubifs with fastmap or such. May 31 11:21:57 LetoThe2nd: ah. I'm gonna have 2 rfs-partitions installed, so it makes more sense to keep it in /boot. May 31 11:22:50 tasslehoff: also, a lot of rom loaders can access fat directly and might pull stuff from there. May 31 11:28:06 LetoThe2nd: have to read up on the imx6 rom loader before doing anything drastic then. May 31 11:32:13 tasslehoff: so as usual, it "depends" May 31 11:38:42 ok May 31 11:40:19 That is within one .bbappend file. what if there are some four other bbappend file for the same package in different layers, in that case how is it decided ? May 31 13:19:27 hello otavio do you have any eta for the meta-qt5 pyro branch? May 31 13:19:46 I would like to switch my yocto projects to pyro, and for now I'm tracking meta-qt5 branch master May 31 13:23:11 If adding "inherit lib_package" changes the final rpm name of the library package, I assume I should add RPROVIDES/RREPLACES/RCONFLICTS to the recipe? May 31 15:26:12 Hey, building my recipe I keep getting warnings like`is owned by uid 1000, which is the same as the user running bitbake. This may be due to host contamination` May 31 15:26:52 did you write your own do_install() or do you have a class that does the install for you? May 31 15:27:21 as do_compile() happens as you but install happens as (fake)root, you need to reset ownership on install. autotools/cmake/etc do this for you. May 31 15:32:05 I have my do_install that calls oe_runmake install DESTDIR=${D} prefix=${prefix} May 31 15:32:18 sounds like the makefile uses cp instead of install May 31 15:32:27 (cp will preserve permissions, cp can be told not to) May 31 15:33:59 Makefile uses `INSTALL = cp -fp` May 31 15:35:12 yeah -p means preserve, which is just wrong for a makefile installing stuff May 31 15:35:36 thanks rburton May 31 15:35:54 try passing INSTALL=install in your oe_runmake May 31 15:53:33 rburton: this worked great May 31 16:52:18 Hi all, May 31 16:52:23 Maybe somebody could help me May 31 16:54:39 " LIC_FILES_CHKSUM points to an invalid file: " error after making poky update May 31 16:55:08 I've wiped out all the content of "build" dir (only leaving downloads) May 31 17:28:38 How can I get `/etc/os-release` in my image May 31 17:38:39 when I try to execute ifup wlan0, i get SIOCSIFFLAGS: Operation not possible due to RF-kill May 31 17:39:01 what is RF-kill and how do I turn on RF? May 31 17:39:26 there is no rfkill executable on my build, how would I generate one? May 31 17:44:22 jose__: install the os-release package May 31 17:54:20 i found it, getting desperate: bitbake rfkill May 31 17:59:14 so now I don't have /etc/network/if-up.d, what went wrong with generating that? this is very frustrating. Very. May 31 18:05:33 is there a way to see the PACKAGECONFIG I'm building a specific recipe with? May 31 18:06:02 I need to figure out how http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/tree/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_232.bb#n243 doesn't do what it's supposed to May 31 18:39:51 fischerm: bitbake recipename -e | less May 31 18:41:08 fischerm, watch the mender bbappend for systemd May 31 18:42:59 rburton: so I think it doesn't create a symlink for /etc/resolv.conf from /lib/systemd/resolve/resolv.conf May 31 18:43:15 DISTRO_FEATURES includes definitely resolved May 31 18:43:18 confusion ensues May 31 18:50:18 eh May 31 18:50:23 PACKAGE_CONFIG that is May 31 18:52:11 bitbake systemd | grep ^PACKAGE_CONFIG btw May 31 18:59:25 erm, PACKAGECONFIG May 31 19:10:27 could duplicates in PACKAGECONFIG be an issue? May 31 19:13:52 Crofton|work: ^^ May 31 19:26:08 no May 31 19:30:31 Im trying to add a package using python (instead of parsing bash), does anyone have a clue of what I should be looking at? May 31 19:31:33 aehs29: i'm not sure what you're trying to do May 31 19:35:06 rburton: so basically we can add a package via PACKAGES += "whatever", when bitbake parses it it creates a packages for that, I want to be able to do just that but from a python function May 31 19:36:54 rburton: d.addPackage('SUMMARY', 'DEPEND1, DEPEND2', 'RDEPEND1, RDEPEND2') May 31 19:37:43 python() { d.appendVar('PACKAGES', 'whatever') } would work, no? May 31 19:37:48 yeah you'd think so May 31 19:38:02 neverpanic: I dont think that woul actually create the package May 31 19:38:05 http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/current/mega-manual/mega-manual.html#var-PACKAGES_DYNAMIC might also be helpful May 31 19:38:18 neverpanic: woo I like that May 31 19:38:25 aehs29: d.setVar('PACKAGES', ' '.join(packages)) May 31 19:38:27 aehs29: If will, if you also have a FILES_package referencing actual files or are setting ALLOW_EMPTY_package May 31 19:38:31 aehs29: that's the last line of do_split_packages() May 31 19:38:34 s/If/It/ May 31 19:38:57 so yes, you just need to set the right variables exactly as you would from the recipe May 31 19:39:08 rburton: I would be adding the files as well May 31 19:39:14 so set FILES_packagename too May 31 19:39:16 rburton: nice, it sounds easier than I thought I think May 31 19:39:20 neverpanic: rburton thanks! May 31 19:39:37 basically, do_split_packages shows that it works exactly as you'd expect - and tbh do_split_packages might be what you're looking for :) May 31 19:45:58 rburton: I'm looking at it and it does look like that was what I was looking for May 31 19:47:42 fischerm, I doubt dupes would be an issue May 31 20:04:22 Hi folks, I occasionally see lines like this on my system when trying to build things that use python-native: May 31 20:04:24 | /home/cody/obj/herc1-a/tmp/sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/bin/python-native/python: /home/cody/obj/herc1-a/tmp/sysroots-uninative/x86_64-linux/lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.25' not found (required by /home/cody/obj/herc1-a/tmp/sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/bin/python-native/../../lib/libpython2.7.so.1.0) May 31 20:05:17 1. is there a quicker way to resolve than removing all sstate-cache and regenerating? (I'm trying just cleaning python-native now, but in the past I've wiped everything) May 31 20:05:46 2. is that type of error expected to happen in some cases (maybe if I update my host's glibc? even a minor upgrade?) May 31 21:36:14 is there a way to influence PACKAGECONFIG[feature] without bbappend? (ie. in local.conf) May 31 21:43:20 sobczyk: yes, see the docs May 31 21:43:57 (http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/current/ref-manual/ref-manual.html#var-PACKAGECONFIG) May 31 21:44:54 huh the docs for PACKAGECONFIG_CONFAGS are totally wrong May 31 22:01:17 rburton: can a package depend on other package with a feature on? May 31 22:01:55 I've just hit a compile bug when kde lib failed to compile because accessibility was off in qt5 May 31 22:03:43 no May 31 22:04:53 is it possible to do an active check? **** ENDING LOGGING AT Thu Jun 01 03:00:01 2017