**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Fri Oct 19 03:00:00 2018 Oct 19 06:36:38 jofr: did you solve your /opt case? Oct 19 06:41:40 kuzulis: this is known, the ext3 image is not not yet in DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE Oct 19 06:42:29 kuzulis: it's in the IMGDEPLOYDIR Oct 19 08:19:25 RP: last round of _remove bitbake changes seems to have unexpected change in behavior, ping me when you're around to discuss (or I'll send it to list after gathering more data0 Oct 19 08:19:50 hello! Does the order in IMAGE_INSTALL matter? Oct 19 08:20:09 banach-space: it basically should not Oct 19 08:20:30 So would you say that alphabetical order is a good practice? Oct 19 08:21:08 banach-space: *shrug* i tend to group by functionality. i would say that any understandable order is a good practise. Oct 19 08:22:07 Ta LetoThe2nd ! Oct 19 08:43:40 Hi all Oct 19 08:44:03 ak77: What do you mean about "this is known, the ext3 image is not not yet in DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE" ? Oct 19 08:45:15 kuzulis: this means that DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE is a pure output dir that you're not supposed to rely on. Oct 19 08:46:01 uglyoldbob: Hi. Many for your help. Sorry for delay.. Oct 19 08:46:24 uglyoldbob: I tried bbwarn "${IMAGE_NAME%-*}" and it returns an empty string Oct 19 08:46:49 kuzulis: the imagetypes you depend on are provided in IMGDEPLOYDIR Oct 19 08:49:57 LetoThe2nd: Ahh.. do you mean, that I need to take the *.ext3 files from there (from IMGDEPLOYDIR)? Oct 19 08:50:07 kuzulis: eeeexactly Oct 19 08:50:14 :))) Oct 19 08:50:23 magic Oct 19 08:51:17 kuzulis: actually its just infrastructural enforcement of an already known best practise Oct 19 08:51:38 kuzulis: and it removes undeterministic reliance of your builds on the deploy-dir Oct 19 08:52:03 (but yeah, i got bitten by that too.) Oct 19 08:56:46 LetoThe2nd: Many thanks. Hmm.. but it does not work too.. because I construct that path as $DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE/${IMAGE_NAME}${IMAGE_NAME_SUFFIX}.ext3 Oct 19 08:57:14 LetoThe2nd: Where ${IMAGE_NAME} returns a path with the timestamp Oct 19 08:57:59 LetoThe2nd: e.g. irp-embedded-qt5-x11-image-apalis-imx6-20181019085311.rootfs.ext3 Oct 19 08:59:04 but, seems I need in irp-embedded-qt5-x11-image-apalis-imx6.ext3 which is symlink to thet file Oct 19 09:01:15 kuzulis: well, inspect the variables and the respective directory contents. but IMGDEPLOYDIR is certainly the correct starting point. Oct 19 09:03:07 LetoThe2nd: seems I need to use the IMAGE_LINK_NAME instead of IMAGE_NAME to generate a full ext.3 path Oct 19 09:15:18 LetoThe2nd: Do I need to use an equivalents of IMGDEPLOYDIR but for the U-Boot, Linux Kernel and other stuff by analogy? Oct 19 09:15:54 if I want to copy an U-Boot, Linux Kernel's stuff to another location Oct 19 09:20:27 kuzulis: no idea, our system is a bit different there. Oct 19 09:21:01 ok, many thanks for your time Oct 19 09:21:37 np, good luck Oct 19 09:36:33 JaMa: hi, around now. Just looking at your email Oct 19 09:37:03 LetoThe2nd: I have another question: my yocto does not generates the mbr.bin && boot.vfat files. Do you know where is it? Oct 19 09:39:44 kuzulis: nope. those are not generically known files, but something the is probably either board or bootloader specific Oct 19 09:39:59 ok, clear Oct 19 09:41:32 JaMa: I reproduced with just OE-Core and a bbappend Oct 19 09:43:59 JaMa: what is interesting is that code uses OVERRIDES to apply pkgname so it does d.getVar("RDEPENDS") Oct 19 09:44:08 JaMa: now I know that I can try and write a simpler test case Oct 19 11:28:30 JaMa: patch in -next and on the bitbake list Oct 19 12:04:48 RP: thanks, cherry-picked to my builds to test it Oct 19 12:06:13 RP: I'm still a bit surprised that it caused QA error only in these 2 cases and not in all RDEPENDS_${PN}_remove case I have (a lot) Oct 19 12:12:04 where do i look to troubleshoot my pkg_postinst_blabla functions? Oct 19 12:26:20 What happens (or should happen) if two layers contain recipies for similar package/git-repo (yet 2 different versions). Is there any overriding taking place is it basically a FIFO? Oct 19 13:18:01 banach-space: layer priority controls that in the absence of a PREFERRED_VERSION Oct 19 13:22:08 Hello I have one question, why on one VM during extracting SDK I got "exec: /usr/bin/env: argument list too long" Oct 19 13:22:23 on another PC It works OK Oct 19 13:29:44 LetoThe2nd: Sorry for the delay replying! Thanks - is there a standardised way of using containers for Yocto? Im quite interested in this as I was already thinking about using a more virtualised environment to standardise my builds (was originally thinking vmware) Oct 19 13:30:24 LetoThe2nd: I was also looking into using toaster - can it work with containerised builds? Oct 19 13:36:08 Guys, how I can add the 'truncate' command to my script? Oct 19 13:36:47 because a script fails with: run.do_image_miaimg.31444: truncate: not found Oct 19 13:37:39 I tried to add : do_image_miaimg[depends] = "truncate" or 'truncate-native' but it fails too Oct 19 13:45:39 Ahh.. I need in coreutils-native.. sorry Oct 19 13:50:28 All Question: sumo and sumo-next are different SHA-1. Is it best to go with sumo-next due to bug fixes or should I stick with sumo for a release? Oct 19 13:55:39 Is there a difference between "FOOBAR +=" and "FOOBAR_append"? Oct 19 13:57:08 Sorry. it's in the manual. :P Oct 19 13:57:09 does anyone know what could be the reason why do_deploy task doesn't deploy anything until I manually clean the sstate cache? Oct 19 14:03:57 I see cross-compiler changes and using the host gcc instead of the cross-compiler. That is necessary. I need sumo-next Oct 19 14:09:26 Thank you kergoth ! Oct 19 14:47:40 New news from stackoverflow: tree of dependencies for python library in yocto build Oct 19 15:55:25 If I have a recipe for a package, say foo (which is 100% sure parsed), does this mean that foo is going to be installed? Or do I have to add it to IMAGE_INSTALL (or somewhere else as a dependency)? Oct 19 15:55:56 no, adding a recipe makes it available to be built, that's all Oct 19 15:56:12 either bitbake foo or add foo to IMAGE_INSTALL or otherwise add it to a dependency of something you're building Oct 19 15:56:35 got it, thank you kergoth ! Oct 19 20:09:27 anybody know what might cause a gtk+3 demo program to no properly go fullscreen? Oct 19 21:03:00 uglyoldbob: maximise or full screen? maximise will keep the title bar if you're using matchbox, proper fullscreen should work though Oct 19 21:04:28 fullscreen. I'm getting black borders around the program. matchbox-terminal doesn't do this Oct 19 21:04:50 gtk reports window size of 200x200 Oct 19 21:07:38 matchbox-terminal is a gtk+ app, so i'd be looking at what your demo app is doing Oct 19 21:07:46 maybe it has size restrictions in the code Oct 19 21:15:05 https://github.com/uglyoldbob/gumstix_progs Oct 19 21:33:22 * uglyoldbob will be back monday **** ENDING LOGGING AT Sat Oct 20 03:00:00 2018