**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Mon Dec 24 02:59:59 2018
Dec 24 03:13:08 <Jack3k3> well i did some modifications to get opkg to print full verbosity and I can find nothing that indicates where the failure is occuring
Dec 24 04:05:30 <Jack3k3> ahh interesting, dmesg shows opkg is seg faulting
Dec 24 04:05:44 <Jack3k3> looks like this is going to be a real pain in the ass to figure out
Dec 24 07:27:57 <yocti> New news from stackoverflow: How to integrated mender within lk-bootloader base-on Yocto Project <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/53910257/how-to-integrated-mender-within-lk-bootloader-base-on-yocto-project>
Dec 24 08:38:19 <RP> khem: our current cross-canadian is three part (BUILD, SDK, TARGET)...
Dec 24 08:46:17 <khem> can sdk == arm ?
Dec 24 09:17:50 <nacknick> hi
Dec 24 09:20:25 <nacknick> if I want to compile ALL yocto with "arm" (not "thumb") how should I do this? I have ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET = "arm" in 'local.conf', and DISTRO_ARM_INSTRUCTION ?= "arm" in 'fslc-base.inc'. The programs are compiled with 'arm', but '_start' function (for instance) is still compiled with thumb.
Dec 24 09:40:57 <RP> khem: in theory
Dec 24 09:41:50 <RP> khem: I just checked and that libc override appears to be doing the right thing
Dec 24 09:54:49 <RP> khem: its broken for the SDKs but ok everywhere else
Dec 24 15:22:34 <khem> RP: ok cool. btw. you need https://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/157389/
Dec 24 15:22:55 <khem> RP: so this gets tested as well
Dec 24 15:23:16 <khem> since it will be required for new sequence to work
Dec 24 15:23:31 <khem> on gold
Dec 24 15:23:46 <khem> avoid double testing
Dec 24 16:00:41 <RP> khem: Is that for 2.28 or 2.29 or both?
Dec 24 16:03:44 <khem> both
Dec 24 16:08:14 <khem> vmeson: reproduced it on master-next
Dec 24 16:25:44 <RP> khem: thanks, added to -next
Dec 24 17:07:29 <khem> thanks RP I have some doubts on that patch thats why I want it to be throughly tested
Dec 24 17:35:43 <RP> khem: it along with the other tweaks in -next are running on the AB now
Dec 24 17:36:36 <khem> okay
Dec 24 23:22:11 <RP> khem: build was green apart from some known issues unrelated to the toolchain
Dec 25 00:02:34 <Jack3k3> is there a specific step in bitbake image builds where ownership is setup for the rootfs? My build failed to start up successfully because all of the files are owned by the uid of the process I used to do bitbake, not the root user
Dec 25 00:02:39 <Jack3k3> Im trying to figure out what went wrong
Dec 25 00:55:19 <khem> RP: cool. Lets push
Dec 25 00:55:40 <khem> a good christmas present to community :) reduced and simplified toolchain build sequence
Dec 25 01:14:34 <neverpanic> Jack3k3: That's normal, bitbake doesn't build as root, it only emulates the privileges.
**** ENDING LOGGING AT Tue Dec 25 02:59:59 2018