**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Thu Dec 27 02:59:59 2018 Dec 27 07:46:20 I'm using petalinux and having trouble overriding a variable set in petalinux-features.conf, which seems to be included after my petalinuxbsp.conf (local.conf) according to bitbake Dec 27 07:48:33 specifically trying to blacklist nodejs from being built as an mraa dep Dec 27 10:42:41 hello! Dec 27 10:43:02 why does compiling of (e.g.) luajit for raspberrypi (32bit) requires gcc multilib on host ? Dec 27 10:43:29 one would expect that that would be part of the build system, Dec 27 11:33:08 ak77: that seems odd Dec 27 11:34:12 RP: it's specified in https://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/2.6/ref-manual/ref-manual.html#required-packages-for-the-build-host so it's ok. Dec 27 11:34:43 RP: it was overlooked by co-worker and we started to wonder why is that necessary Dec 27 11:35:42 ak77: I'm still not convinced we should need that Dec 27 11:38:38 ak77: doesn't look like its in the suse/fedora depends Dec 27 11:50:42 RP: luajit was failing due to missing sys/types.h Dec 27 11:52:07 ak77: a -native recipe? Dec 27 11:52:31 ak77: I guess we have a reason for listing it there... Dec 27 13:09:30 khem: patches are being tested on the AB in -next btw Dec 27 14:02:05 RP: I am not sure. I think it wasn't native. Dec 27 14:35:33 is it possible to get package name inside the recipe (without .ipk) ? Dec 27 14:35:50 full name, or should I do ${PN}_${PV} Dec 27 14:36:07 Is someone here familiar with Automotive Grade Linux (AGL) distribution? Dec 27 15:21:53 will thud include systmed 240 ? Dec 27 15:22:09 I'm looking forward to use systemd-resolved on musl Dec 27 15:30:06 ak77: thud was released so no, it wasn't in thud Dec 27 15:53:10 luajit is special case, where it needs 32bit native compiler to generate 32bit data configs for itself when cross compied for 32bit target Dec 27 15:53:43 you will have same issue when you build on 32bit host and target 64bit arch Dec 27 15:53:55 just the nature of beast Dec 27 15:54:21 can we fix it, sure but it will be a major surgery Dec 27 15:56:27 RP: cool, I have added git versions of gcc/glibc/binutils, I think it is quite useful, where we find errors in packages and discuss them pre-emptively rather than doing it when we do major upgrade Dec 27 15:57:29 it will also give recipe maintainers a chance to see how their recipe is doing with latest master of toolchain upstream Dec 27 16:03:04 khem: we should wire that into poky-bleeding Dec 27 16:04:32 and build it once a week Dec 27 16:05:08 khem: exactly, something like that Dec 27 16:35:26 Hey all, I know I can define the u-boot defconfig as UBOOT_CONFIG. How can I use the in kernel defconfig? Is adding "defconfig" to SRC_URI only option? Dec 27 16:59:40 * armpit hehe, kernel version 4.20... wonder what code name it will get Dec 27 17:01:12 pn: it actually depends on the kernel recipe, unfortunately. there's no single mechanism by which defconfig gets copied to .config. kernel.bbclass will do it in do_configure if .config doesn't exist and defconfig is in workdir, so some rely on that Dec 27 17:01:22 some obey a DEFCONFIG or KERNEL_DEFCONFIG variable, otehrs don't Dec 27 17:01:27 some support fragments, some don't Dec 27 17:01:39 it's something we need to work on, there are open issues in bugzilla Dec 27 17:29:50 kergoth: Thanks. Could you please share the bugzilla ID? Dec 27 17:33:11 https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8191 is one of them. not sure if there's anything regarding defconfig usage consistency or a variable for it offhand Dec 27 17:33:12 Bug 8191: enhancement, High, 2.99, bruce.ashfield, IN PROGRESS IMPLEMENTATION , apply kernel config fragments to arbitrary kernels Dec 27 17:34:35 khem: huh, https://morpheus.2f30.org/ is rather interesting. another musl based distro, but uses suckless and bsd tooling Dec 27 17:34:56 wonder what the licensing is for its components Dec 27 17:35:54 kergoth: Thanks Dec 27 17:53:42 kergoth: its GNU-free effort Dec 27 18:04:09 nice of eclipse to line up moving oxygen to archive during my vacation Dec 27 18:18:29 khem: pretty interesting, i bet there are folks that'd like a gnu-free embedded option Dec 27 19:05:50 kergoth: yes, having a non-android system which can do no-GPL userspace is interesting proposition Dec 27 19:06:32 kergoth: creating meta-bsd is in my list of things to do.. btw. I already have recipes for runit/s6 as init system Dec 27 19:06:35 There are still some companies that are a tad gun-shy on the gpl even now Dec 27 19:06:39 ah, nice Dec 27 19:07:12 yeah lawyers make good money with GPL : Dec 27 19:08:11 but I see on GH new projects are using either MIT or Apache-2.0 more than GPL now a days to create new projets Dec 27 19:09:01 so devs are not worries about someone running away with their code anymore I guess Dec 27 19:09:34 or maybe the sheer competition to find users for your software is driving it too Dec 27 19:11:24 companies can definitely comply with the letter of the gpl without being good citizens anwyay, by posting crappy tarballs and stuff. there's less tangible company benefits to being seen as a participant in open-source communities.. those benefits probably s till apply to non-gpl projects Dec 27 19:11:26 * kergoth shrugs Dec 27 20:54:25 Hi, I'm trying to build core-image-minimal for a Raspberry Pi 3. bitbake gets to the very last recipe and fails. The error is "core-image-minimal-1.0-r0 do_rootfs: Function failed: do_rootfs". The log file says "No match for argument: packagegroup-core-ssh-openssh", but that package group has in fact been built. Google doesn't reveal anything useful. Any thoughts? Dec 27 21:39:21 Is it possible to "freeze" a variable in local.conf to prevent later layers from overriding it? Dec 27 21:41:36 you can use overrides for that purpose Dec 27 21:41:41 i.e. FOO_forcevariable = "1" Dec 27 21:44:42 so for BINDINGS_pn-foo, BINDINGS_pn-foo_forcevariable = "1" should be added? Dec 27 21:46:54 that wo uld do, bitbake does support using multiple overrides Dec 27 21:47:08 it's far from clean, though. those layers should be improved Dec 27 21:48:09 this is xilinx's stuff, so it's a bit hard to touch in general Dec 27 22:16:16 + Dec 28 01:47:34 hi ,Do you know how to config bitbake use python3 not python2 for build ? I have too PCS, one use each, i don't know why this happens, seems python3 is faster. thanks Dec 28 01:50:56 lei_: use master Dec 28 01:53:03 khem: sorry, some more details on this ? Dec 28 01:59:05 latest master/trunk should support py3 Dec 28 02:00:32 khem: oh i see, thanks a lot. seems newer yocto makes py3 as default. **** BEGIN LOGGING AT Fri Dec 28 02:18:13 2018 **** BEGIN LOGGING AT Fri Dec 28 02:29:10 2018 **** ENDING LOGGING AT Fri Dec 28 02:59:58 2018