**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Mon Apr 22 03:01:03 2019
Apr 22 03:06:05 <yocti> New news from stackoverflow: Yocto Recipe Not Installing File to Image <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/55584098/yocto-recipe-not-installing-file-to-image>
Apr 22 03:36:09 <yocti> New news from stackoverflow: How to declare dependencies of ffs(function file system) in yocto recipe <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/55788782/how-to-declare-dependencies-of-ffsfunction-file-system-in-yocto-recipe>
Apr 22 05:36:27 <yocti> New news from stackoverflow: Yocto Recipe Not Installing File to Image <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/55584098/yocto-recipe-not-installing-file-to-image>
Apr 22 15:12:24 <kergoth> Hm, wonder what it'd take for bitbake to be happy with multiple clients connectd to the server at the same time, as long as only one is trying to kick off builds, so the other could be used for inspection
Apr 22 15:20:22 <Striking7> kergoth: that would be music to my ears. I need to run a bunch of queries to bitbake concurrently right now. They're all effectively read-only other than a few temp files: get the upstream versions of a recipe available, spit them out
Apr 22 15:21:11 <Striking7> The bitbake server became a chokepoint because of its blocking nature. I ended up deploying it to a bunch of docker containers and querying them concurrently.
Apr 22 15:21:43 <Striking7> it was more work than it probably needed to be that way but I wasn't sure if I there was a better way to access that info without blocking on the bitbake service.
Apr 22 15:38:03 <yocti> New news from stackoverflow: How to enable ngx_stream_core_module in Yocto <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/55796899/how-to-enable-ngx-stream-core-module-in-yocto>
Apr 22 16:41:53 <black_13> what is the relation between oe-core and yocto
Apr 22 16:43:09 <kergoth> I would really love it if https://www.yoctoproject.org/software-overview/
Apr 22 16:43:11 <kergoth> er
Apr 22 16:43:12 <kergoth> https://www.yoctoproject.org/software-overview/
Apr 22 16:43:31 <kergoth> I was going to say I'd love a vim plugin that directly communicated with the bitbake server
Apr 22 16:43:58 <black_13> so yocto is from open embedded
Apr 22 16:47:42 <kergoth> i don't understand that statement
Apr 22 16:47:59 <black_13> kergoth: is that in response to my statement
Apr 22 16:48:03 <kergoth> yes
Apr 22 16:48:29 <black_13> I am trying to understand how yocto relates to oe-core
Apr 22 16:49:05 <black_13> and what is the definitive way to build for the wandboard imx-6 i own
Apr 22 16:49:11 <black_13> yocto or oe-core
Apr 22 16:50:40 <JaMa> read the link kergoth gave you
Apr 22 16:50:50 <black_13> it looks likew
Apr 22 16:50:57 <black_13> like your correct
Apr 22 16:51:28 <black_13> "Historically the project grew from, and works with the OpenEmbedded Project which is where the build system and some of the meta-data are derived."
Apr 22 16:51:32 <kergoth> oe-core is one component of what yocto provides. oe-core + bitbake *is* the yoto buildsystem. it's not possible to build with yocto without oe-core. so there is no 'yocto or oe-core' question.
Apr 22 16:51:36 <kergoth> you didn't read enough.
Apr 22 16:51:41 <kergoth> read the entire page, not one random sentence
Apr 22 17:01:07 <keith> anyone setup yocto w/ connman to automatically bring up a wifi network? I can't seem to find where I need to drop a file into /var/lib/connman. I assume it's a bbappend I create?
Apr 22 17:01:26 <keith> or, i'd be fine w/ using systemd-networkd as well, if anyone knows off the top of their head there
Apr 22 17:28:20 <kergoth> RP: https://asciinema.org/a/bcZv5wpdCzvYKDC4s4RoONpAO any objections to this going into vim-bitbake and bitbake/contrib/vim as long as it remains opt-in? alters the ftplugin to call out to a script that just parses bblayers.conf+layer.conf and dumps bbpath to set 'path'
Apr 22 17:32:23 <kergoth> https://github.com/kergoth/vim-bitbake/compare/set-path
Apr 22 17:32:26 * kergoth gets food
Apr 22 18:06:57 <moosnat> zeddii: I refactored `image-oci` to use `umoci`, and am pretty pleased with it so far!
Apr 22 18:25:13 <zeddii> for limited use cases, yah. but as a proper native tool, it’s a no-go.
Apr 22 18:29:03 <moosnat> Do you know if it's possible to incrementally install packages into a rootfs? I'm trying to create multiple layers in an OCI image
Apr 22 21:39:06 <yocti> New news from stackoverflow: Packaging files generated by multiple Yocto recipes to a separate image <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/55801226/packaging-files-generated-by-multiple-yocto-recipes-to-a-separate-image>
Apr 22 22:56:31 <moosnat> Is it possible to build `musl` for a native target?
**** ENDING LOGGING AT Tue Apr 23 02:59:57 2019