**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Fri May 17 02:59:57 2019
May 17 04:48:47 <grup> It seems that my sstate cache behaves weirdly at times.
May 17 04:48:53 <grup> There seems to be a "hidden" character, which makes do_rootfs() fail when installing binutils-lic package inside the image.
May 17 04:49:00 <grup> https://pastebin.com/HR6XJH0R Anyone has helpful pointers (except for deleting sstate cache and building everything again)?
May 17 04:49:06 <grup> I have tried "bitbake -c cleansstate binutils", however, that also doesn't solve the problem.
May 17 05:13:36 <aehs29> has anyone else been having trouble with the list?
May 17 05:13:46 <aehs29> apparently its rejecting my patches for some reason
May 17 05:52:36 <yocti> New news from stackoverflow: Custom eSDK build failure <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/56180103/custom-esdk-build-failure>
May 17 06:48:55 <mckoan> good morning
May 17 06:50:05 <LetoThe2nd> howdy! i've got a strange / bug observation: a really simple meson-based recipe http://paste.ubuntu.com/p/CNVQJvNZnX/ works nicely with package_ipk, but fails with package_rpm. interestingly, this happens somewhen during rootfs creation, when dnf kicks in: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/ZnjqfkHvnM/
May 17 06:50:35 <alessioigor> mckoan: You too, Marco.
May 17 07:03:31 <mckoan> alessioigor: ;-)
May 17 07:35:20 <erbo> LetoThe2nd: And no weird chars in recipe name?
May 17 07:36:33 <LetoThe2nd> not at all
May 17 07:36:38 <LetoThe2nd> "this-is_git.bb"
May 17 07:37:13 <LetoThe2nd> and renaming to "thisis" does not change things too
May 17 07:38:44 <LetoThe2nd> the fun fact is that it works nicely with package_ipk. so i suspect some (un-?)intended interaction between meson and package_rpm
May 17 07:42:30 <erbo> Can you see that the rpm got created ok in WORKDIR for this-is?
May 17 07:42:52 <erbo> So that it's not that the packaged ended up empty and wasn't created or something
May 17 07:43:27 <erbo> I don't know if the defaults for creating empty packages differes between ipk and rpm
May 17 07:44:21 <LetoThe2nd> hum, deploy-rpms only has -dbg and -dev
May 17 07:45:27 <erbo> When I built the recipe locally no files are installed
May 17 07:45:38 <LetoThe2nd> erbo: you mean the meson build file misses the install target and this breaks it?
May 17 07:45:45 <LetoThe2nd> very well possible, indeed.
May 17 07:46:03 <erbo> yeah that seems to be the case
May 17 07:46:13 <LetoThe2nd> erbo: let me check that, thanks a lot!
May 17 07:53:00 <yocti> New news from stackoverflow: An issue with postinst-intercept scripts <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/56181757/an-issue-with-postinst-intercept-scripts>
May 17 08:00:53 <LetoThe2nd> erbo: that did the trick, thanks again!
May 17 08:55:08 <fray> hopefully final version just sent.. has the skip login in it
May 17 10:37:44 <kanavin_> RP: the new rpm test skips itself if it can't find the needed rpm package,  which I think is wrong
May 17 10:38:05 <kanavin_> RP: don't merge that please, until we get to the root cause of why the package isn't there sometimes
May 17 10:38:39 <kanavin_> run-postinsts should be there always unless the image is read-only
May 17 11:02:49 <ZubairLK> Hi,
May 17 11:02:49 <ZubairLK> I can't seem to compile util-linux-lsblk in warrior. Used to be ok. Is something wrong with http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/commit/?id=d11cbdf149cbfd273e76796a2444d4b9423c9ab0 that breaks the package?
May 17 11:08:49 <ZubairLK> Error message when I bitbake util-linux-lsblk is
May 17 11:08:49 <ZubairLK> ERROR: Nothing PROVIDES 'util-linux-lsblk'. Close matches:   util-linux   util-linux RPROVIDES util-linux-lsblk
May 17 11:08:49 <LetoThe2nd> ZubairLK: well whats wrong with doing "bitbake util-linux" then
May 17 11:08:49 <ZubairLK> I don't want the complete util-linux package installed in my image. Just lsblk.
May 17 11:08:49 <LetoThe2nd> ZubairLK: well then install the package. but you cannot build it seperately anymore, it gets created as part of util-linux. thats basically what this commit does.
**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Fri May 17 11:10:01 2019
May 17 11:10:36 <kroon> ZubairLK, so you get no util-linux-lsblk* under tmp/deploy/*
May 17 11:10:45 <kroon> no package for it
May 17 11:13:13 <ZubairLK> @kroon nope. `find . | grep util-linux-lsblk` returns nothing in tmp/deploy
May 17 11:28:36 <kroon> odd
May 17 11:38:25 <kroon> ZubairLK, does your log.do_compile reference lsblk.c ?
May 17 11:41:48 <ZubairLK> I find these in do_package_write_ipk logs.
May 17 11:41:49 <ZubairLK> NOTE: Not creating empty archive for util-linux-lslocks-2.32.1-r0                                                                                                                         NOTE: Not creating empty archive for util-linux-lscpu-2.32.1-r0                                                                                                                           NOTE: Not creating empty archive for util-linux-look-2.32.1-r0
May 17 11:42:21 <ZubairLK> yes lsblk.c is referenced in the do_compile log
May 17 11:49:49 <erbo> ZubairLK: I know bitbake couldn't find out which recipe provide which package when PACKAGES_DYNAMIC was used a while back. Maybe that's still the case, would explain your issue.
May 17 11:50:41 <erbo> ZubairLK: do you get the util-linux-lsblk rpm in tmp/deploy/ if you bitbake util-linux?
May 17 11:51:00 <erbo> s/rpm/ipk
May 17 11:52:18 <ZubairLK> No. no util-linux-lsblk package when I do a bitbake util-linux
May 17 11:52:41 <ZubairLK> probably because of "temp/log.do_package_write_ipk.10434:128:NOTE: Not creating empty archive for util-linux-lsblk-2.32.1-r0"
May 17 11:53:04 <ZubairLK> temp/log.do_package.21524:1070:DEBUG: util-linux-lsblk: Dependency libblkid.so.1 requires package util-linux-libblkid (used by files: /home/zubairlk/resin/yocto/resin-intel/build/tmp/work/core2-64-poky-linux/util-linux/2.32.1-r0/packages-split/util-linux-lsblk/usr/bin/lsblk)
May 17 11:53:10 <ZubairLK> temp/log.do_package.21524:1071:DEBUG: util-linux-lsblk: Dependency libsmartcols.so.1 requires package util-linux-libsmartcols (used by files: /home/zubairlk/resin/yocto/resin-intel/build/tmp/work/core2-64-poky-linux/util-linux/2.32.1-r0/packages-split/util-linux-lsblk/usr/bin/lsblk)
May 17 11:53:27 <ZubairLK> those don't look nice.
May 17 11:53:39 <ZubairLK> a couple of other dependencies like that as well
May 17 11:54:19 <erbo> Hmm, since it put "/usr/bin/lsblk" in "packages-split/util-linux-lsblk" I wonder why it is skipped due to being empty?
May 17 11:55:05 <ZubairLK> temp/log.do_package.21524:521:DEBUG: LIBNAMES: pkg util-linux-lsblk libs 0 bins 1 sonames []
May 17 11:55:10 <ZubairLK> indeed. it does say 1 binary
May 17 11:56:09 <ZubairLK> actually. packages-split/util-linux-lsblk/ folder is empty.
May 17 11:56:25 <ZubairLK> in fact many packages-split/util-linux-*/ folders are empty
May 17 11:57:49 <erbo> Weird, other logs analyzed which file the binary linked to, and then it must have existed in packages-split/util-linux-lsblk/, right?
May 17 12:01:59 <erbo> ZubairLK: can you check in image/usr/bin/ if util-linux-blkid is a symlink?
May 17 12:02:53 <erbo> That seems to get some extra handling that will put it into the package of the symlink target, if I read the recipe correctly
May 17 12:05:58 <ZubairLK> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 341544 May 15 21:29 image/usr/bin/lsblk
May 17 12:06:11 <ZubairLK> nope. do you mean blkid or lsblk? lsblk is not a symlink
May 17 12:06:47 <ZubairLK> blkid in sbin is also not a symlink -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 426400 May 15 21:29 image/sbin/blkid
May 17 12:06:49 <ZubairLK> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 426400 May 15 21:29 image/sbin/blkid
May 17 12:09:04 <erbo> oh, I meant lsblk :)
May 17 12:13:10 <ZubairLK> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 341544 May 15 21:29 image/usr/bin/lsblk
May 17 12:13:15 <ZubairLK> nope. not symlink
May 17 12:42:26 <erbo> ZubairLK: I did a quick test locally using warrior, and I do get a util-linux-lsblk rpm atleast
May 17 13:24:00 <yocti> New news from stackoverflow: Yocto - Create and populate a separate /home partition <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/56187209/yocto-create-and-populate-a-separate-home-partition>
May 17 13:43:21 <ZubairLK> strange. i'll double check
May 17 13:51:32 <vladzouth> #windows
May 17 13:59:20 <ZubairLK> seems like something in my bbappend (a few alternative_links. not lsblk) might have broken this. because i removed those and I see the package now
May 17 14:24:14 <yocti> New news from stackoverflow: global yocto AM_CFLAGS to pass to the gcc compiler <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/56188145/global-yocto-am-cflags-to-pass-to-the-gcc-compiler>
May 17 19:22:22 <psrcode> not sure if I asked this already but is there a way for adding a dependency on a PACKAGECONFIG options for the ptest packages of a recipe (i.e lttng-tools and the lttng-ust packageconfig option). I would like to force the usage of lttng-ust when the ptest package is installed.
May 17 23:08:42 <RP> kanavin_: agreed
May 17 23:26:49 <aehs29> RP: so I noticed that now the default multiconfig does not have a name
May 17 23:27:05 <aehs29> RP: vs before it was called default
May 17 23:27:19 <aehs29> RP: Im not necessarily against it, just wondering on the reasoning behind that
May 17 23:27:32 <aehs29> RP: my multiconf depends looks a little weird now
May 17 23:29:38 <aehs29> do_image[mcdepends] = "multiconfig::arm64:do_rootfs"
**** ENDING LOGGING AT Sat May 18 03:00:11 2019