**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Mon Jun 03 02:59:57 2019
Jun 03 05:09:53 <samlman> How can I tell a bitbake recipe that I want to to use the `go` compiler without having it to try to do the normal `go` installation/packaging?
Jun 03 05:10:26 <samlman> I'm trying to install this: https://github.com/LukeShu/systemd-timesyncd-wait which looks like it doesn't fit the normal way a go project is packaged but is very simple and comes with a Makefile
Jun 03 06:36:13 <samlman> Hacky solution is to overwrite the do_unpack, do_install etc! Pretty sure there must be a better way but it sure isn't easy to find what it is
Jun 03 06:42:53 <samlman> Nope, this is dumb. Think it will be simpler for me to reimplement this package in another language than try to fight against Yocto. Really frustrating.
Jun 03 10:01:03 <jmiehe> hi, how can I get libatomic.so.1 into my yocto image? (not libatomic-ops)
Jun 03 10:02:14 <jmiehe> I can download this https://rpmfind.net/linux/RPM/fedora/devel/rawhide/armhfp/l/libatomic-9.1.1-1.fc31.armv7hl.html and rsync the contents into the target image, which works (but does not seem viable)
Jun 03 10:21:39 <litb> I'm still trying to build a 32bit kernel for a 32bit image with meta-intel and with the kernel-provider "linux-intel"
Jun 03 10:22:05 <litb> however, I'm still failing. I have set this TARGET_CC_KERNEL_ARCH: TARGET_CC_KERNEL_ARCH = "-m32 -march=nehalem -mtune=generic -mfpmath=sse -msse4.2 -Wformat -Wformat-security -Werror=format-security"
Jun 03 10:22:26 <litb> but kernel modules are still linked as ELF 64-bit LSB relocatable, x86-64
Jun 03 10:24:56 <qschulz> litb: could you try to build with intel-core2-32 machine instead? I don't know how much compatible it is with corei7-64 from kernel side, but since many things are handled not through the DeviceTree (ACPI instead?) it might work. Disclaimer: I don't know much about Intel so just throwing ideas at you basically :D
Jun 03 10:27:38 <litb> qschulz, thanks, I will try if I'm not getting results soon
Jun 03 10:28:30 <litb> qschulz, I'm confused that even though kernel-arch.bb has a `TARGET_CC_KERNEL_ARCH ?= ""`   which is documented as saying it should be assigned the kernel compile flags, I don't see a use anywhere with git grep!
Jun 03 10:28:49 <litb> the only occurance of TARGET_CC_KERNEL_ARCH actually is in that file, and in my local.conf. how can that be?
Jun 03 10:29:24 <litb> (kernel-arch.bb is in OE's meta/classes/)
Jun 03 10:30:42 <litb> ah sorry, it's assigned in the line below to HOST_CC_KERNEL_ARCH ..
Jun 03 11:45:55 <litb> hmm, I executed the devshell like so   bitbake -c devshell linux-intel
Jun 03 11:46:21 <litb> but the shell prompt that is opened doesn't have  the variables in its environment, like MACHINE
Jun 03 11:46:27 <litb> "echo $MACHINE" gives nothing
Jun 03 11:49:29 <opennandra> litb: did you run 'source poky/oe...'
Jun 03 11:51:04 <litb> opennandra, yes. I'm able to do a normal build even, but devshell doesn't appear to have the yocto variables available?
Jun 03 11:51:37 <opennandra> litb: maybe you have some exotic shell? I have samne when e.g. run devshell in docker
Jun 03 11:51:51 <litb> using bash
Jun 03 11:51:51 <opennandra> litb: what is your build evn?
Jun 03 11:52:05 <opennandra> litb: I mean terminal
Jun 03 11:52:12 <litb> screen
Jun 03 11:53:43 <litb> variables like BUILD_CC and others from yocto are visible. but those are only few
Jun 03 11:55:34 <litb> I'm just going to try genericx86 now
Jun 03 12:14:56 <litb> qschulz, i'm using genericx86 now, using the core2-32 tune, and use   TUNE_CCARGS_append = " -march=nehalem -msse4.2" now in my local.conf.
Jun 03 12:15:19 <litb> if it works, I'll make a proper -bsp layer and put that into the layer
Jun 03 12:31:55 <litb> one other question: I removed the directories below tmp/work, and now when I want to rebuild the image, it complains about files being missing in work/
Jun 03 12:32:19 <litb> I think this is because the cache is now in inconsistent state with regard to files in tmp/work. How can I fix this?
Jun 03 12:33:11 <qschulz> what were you trying to achieve by deleting directories beloew tmp/work ?
Jun 03 12:33:43 <litb> qschulz, since I changed the machine name, I wanted to clean-up space on my disk
Jun 03 12:34:41 <litb> so I removed the built intermediate files in work/. I thought, since many of the intermediay files are in buildenv/cache anyway, I could run a new build without waiting for too long.
Jun 03 13:32:18 <yocti> New news from stackoverflow: Why does BitBake error if it can't find www.example.com? <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/52395512/why-does-bitbake-error-if-it-cant-find-www-example-com>
Jun 03 15:41:02 <leitao> What is the best practice to build a .bb receipt that aims two targets? With slightly different SRC_URI for each target
Jun 03 15:41:46 <qschulz> two machines?
Jun 03 15:44:17 <leitao> same machine, two different image types.
Jun 03 15:44:42 <leitao> basically two different .sh I want to install depending on the image type
Jun 03 15:45:03 <kergoth> how would that work if you run 'bitbake one-image two-image three-image'?
Jun 03 15:45:21 <kergoth> you can't modify a recipe based on what image it installs into, you dont know what image it installs into until after the package has been built from it
Jun 03 15:45:37 <kergoth> if you want to go by *machine*, you can do that, but not by image
Jun 03 15:45:58 <kergoth> recipes emit packages, packages are installed into images
Jun 03 15:46:00 <qschulz> leitao: you could build two different packages
Jun 03 15:46:17 <qschulz> and install only the one with the sh script you want in it
Jun 03 15:46:29 <leitao> qschulz: hmm, is this a best practice?
Jun 03 15:46:31 <qschulz> (that's one way to do it, might not be the best)
Jun 03 15:47:05 <qschulz> well, the overriding method with _machine for example, does not exist for images
Jun 03 15:48:03 <qschulz> can I ask why you have two different .sh in the first place? in which ways are they different?
Jun 03 15:48:51 <leitao> qschulz well, I have two images, and depending on the image, a specific package should "install"  a specific .sh for that image
Jun 03 15:49:06 <leitao> if I have SRC_URI_machine = "", it seems to work
Jun 03 15:49:12 <kergoth> just make two recipes / two packages and add the appropriate one to image_install
Jun 03 15:49:20 <kergoth> machine and image are two completely different things
Jun 03 15:49:28 <leitao> right
Jun 03 15:49:29 <kergoth> and are largely orthogonal
Jun 03 15:49:40 <qschulz> leitao: the question is, what is this sh script doing. You might be choosing the wrong path
Jun 03 15:50:19 <qschulz> (I mean, you might need to adapt your SW and not Yocto for it to be cleaner)
Jun 03 15:50:25 <qschulz> Sometimes you have a choice, some other times not
Jun 03 15:51:29 <leitao> right
Jun 03 15:51:41 <leitao> let me try to think more about it. Thanks
Jun 03 15:54:11 <jsp973> newbee here, trying to get advice on debugging patch files that seem to be failing silently.  Is this the right irc?
Jun 03 17:02:52 <yocti> New news from stackoverflow: Where can I find what drivers built in my yocto project Linux kernel image? <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/56431633/where-can-i-find-what-drivers-built-in-my-yocto-project-linux-kernel-image>
Jun 03 17:51:54 <litb> hm, I have checked-out the warrior branch of poky, but there's no "yocto-bsp" and "yocto-kernel" script in poky/scripts ?
Jun 03 17:58:40 <litb> ah, apparently they dropped it
Jun 03 19:03:08 <yocti> New news from stackoverflow: Set python dist-packages path for autotools in Yocto bitbake <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/56433099/set-python-dist-packages-path-for-autotools-in-yocto-bitbake>
Jun 03 19:17:54 <mccc> Hi, I'm wondering if anyone has used Yocto to create web / app /  server images to run as VMs as part of an immutable infrastructure pattern.
Jun 03 19:18:44 <mccc> From what I understand the leading tools in the space are Packer, which creates a production ready image by running scripts in a running VM and then memorializing it,
Jun 03 19:19:17 <mccc> and LinuxKit, which works similar to Yocto in that it builds an image offline in a build environment, but was created by the Docker people so uses Docker containers everywhere.
Jun 03 19:20:50 <mccc> For example - the postgresql recipe is in meta-oe.  Has anyone created an image using the postgresql layer, along with a custom layer to run a database initialization script, taken the image and run it in a VM as a 'code-as-infrastructure' copy of their database server?
**** ENDING LOGGING AT Tue Jun 04 03:00:18 2019