**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Sat Sep 07 03:03:37 2019 Sep 07 12:58:29 RP: sorted out those selftest changes. I skipped splitting binutils because the -j does not reuse sstate so the time to build all the pieces is actually longer than the tests themselves Sep 07 13:02:01 nrossi: I was just reading the series, thanks! Sep 07 13:02:22 nrossi: one question, I think we perhaps want toolchain-user without machine as the tags? Sep 07 13:03:07 nrossi: If I run -t machine, would it run the toolchain tests? Sep 07 13:03:13 RP: i was not quite sure so i kept the machine tag there Sep 07 13:03:41 nrossi: I think -j does reuse sstate depending on how you configure it? Sep 07 13:04:05 nrossi: if I run "oe-selftest -t machine" what runs? Sep 07 13:04:32 RP: everything tagged machine, so yes toolchain tests Sep 07 13:04:53 nrossi: Right, that isn't what we want on the autobuilder Sep 07 13:05:16 We'll need to tweak this to drop the machine bit Sep 07 13:05:44 RP: sure, will also need to fixup the binutils tags since it is just machine atm Sep 07 13:05:55 nrossi: (not criticism, just trying to ensure we get over the final hurdle with this) Sep 07 13:09:11 nrossi: really appreciate getting these patches btw. I was pondering where we're at earlier and how to proceed Sep 07 13:10:00 RP: sorry i thought i was the only one that works outside "office hours" :) Sep 07 13:10:31 nrossi: I can't afford the autobuilder idle time at ths point in the release! Sep 07 13:13:00 nrossi: merged into next with a tweak and quick/full builds fired together. Lets see what that does Sep 07 13:13:21 autobuilder sstate should be hot Sep 07 13:13:58 * RP -> afk for a bit Sep 07 13:17:35 RP: oooppps oh noes python 3.4 vs python 3.7 syntax issue :( Sep 07 13:35:01 RP: oh it has always been there :| minor fix (https://github.com/nathanrossi/openembedded-core/commit/8bb339653335fbe56e317bc6bf3e7e1d6c2007d4) Sep 07 15:47:02 nrossi: I messed up the AB config so retrying Sep 07 16:08:47 nrossi: there are the test cross wrapper in gcc/glibc recipes I think they are redundant now we should remove them Sep 07 16:12:52 khem: you are talking about the -testgcc script generated by gcc-cross and the glibc-testing.inc which i assume were used for manual testing yes? Sep 07 16:19:39 khem, nrossi: I was wondering if we needed those now Sep 07 16:55:51 nrossi: https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/73/builds/1013 :/ Sep 07 17:21:23 nrossi:correct, I was probably the only occasional user so we can remove them now Sep 07 18:18:53 nrossi: found and pushed a fix Sep 07 21:00:15 nrossi: merged with a few tweaks and patch rearranging :) Sep 07 21:16:32 RP:I like that my patches are also going in along with oeqa, I guess I should have sent patches to add runit init system today instead of them :) Sep 07 21:17:50 khem: its only as it was a simple typo ;-) Sep 07 21:18:02 khem: more complex and it would have been defferred Sep 07 21:29:37 RP: I plan to add toolchain oeqa to my regular testing Sep 07 22:18:29 wat is the suggest approach to install an image into a image? i want an initramfs file in my image Sep 07 22:18:35 *what Sep 07 22:46:50 look into INITRAMFS_IMAGE_BUNDLE and INITRAMFS_IMAGE Sep 07 23:03:28 thx Sep 08 01:24:55 New news from stackoverflow: YOCTO : Modify Linux OS features by editing it's device tree **** ENDING LOGGING AT Sun Sep 08 02:59:57 2019