**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Mon May 25 02:59:57 2009 May 25 03:00:09 new release coming ? May 25 03:00:16 no May 25 03:00:18 just r2 May 25 03:00:49 ah. I only noticed today that it was out, but then I guess it's not THAT old May 25 03:01:38 it was released at the end of day on Friday, PST May 25 03:01:46 the Release Notes in the linux zip are still for 1.1 btw May 25 03:01:50 and it only contains a security fix May 25 04:33:24 If I want to allow people to reuse a part of my project (parsing a custom file)... I should be creating an Activity? I thought it would be an intent, but this filetype has no MIME and I can't see how to specify an extension... May 25 04:46:15 pawbie: I would think you would create a ContentProvider for the file. May 25 04:47:35 I think so. I'm working on adding that in now... hm. May 25 04:47:48 I did something similar with a custom uri, so I assumed I could do the same thing with a file (with an intent). May 25 05:21:45 I have a ListView with a SimpleCursorAdapter. I want to setItemChecked() after the query refreshes, but there doesn't seem to be a listener for that? May 25 05:23:04 you have to set a data observer on the adapter itself May 25 05:24:33 Thanks, what class are you referring to? May 25 05:24:36 romainguy, as someone reading on the side, do you know of an example (as I dont know what a data observer is) May 25 05:24:56 http://developer.android.com/reference/java/util/Observer.html <-- perhaps ? May 25 05:25:22 read the documentation.... it's not that hard May 25 05:25:22 http://d.android.com/reference/android/database/DataSetObserver.html May 25 05:25:44 thanks romainguy (i did search for dataobserver.. just didnt come up with that hit. May 25 05:37:12 Why is DataSetObserver a class and not an interface? What does the default onChanged() do? May 25 05:38:08 why would it be an interface? May 25 05:38:19 if it was an interface, adding methods to it would be impossible May 25 05:38:36 and it doesn't do anything by default May 25 05:42:14 Either way you have to define a class, what's the point of a class that doesn't do anything? May 25 05:42:30 "romainguy_: if it was an interface, adding methods to it would be impo" May 25 05:42:45 the point is that we'll be able to extend its API in the future without adding new interfaces May 25 05:44:02 the nice part about android is that there are a lot of helper classes in the framework May 25 05:44:10 so i end up writing code, then finding out i could have done it easier/with less code May 25 05:44:15 assuming i used the correct classes May 25 05:44:26 which is nice, as I now understand how things fit together. May 25 05:44:31 Ah, forwards compatibility, that makes more sense May 25 05:45:17 wmealing: we try to make it easy although I have to admit our APIs could be a LOT better May 25 05:45:29 (in particular: more consistent and cleaner) May 25 05:45:54 romainguy, Going to be many changes in that direction ? or are things going to stay how they are ? May 25 05:46:17 current APIs are set in stone May 25 05:46:20 now they are public... May 25 05:46:34 we try to add niceties though May 25 05:46:41 i'm wondering about updates in "2.0" May 25 05:46:48 there's no 2.0 May 25 05:46:55 for instance in Donut you can write