**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Thu Feb 19 02:59:57 2009 Feb 19 13:05:03 hi, all! Feb 19 13:08:08 when I've added machine/package to contrib/angstrom/build-*.sh what should I do to add these to autobuild? Feb 19 15:22:44 anyone else have bluez fail to compile? Feb 19 15:33:40 cremoris: that half-arsed USB patch that seems to be missing bits again? Feb 19 15:34:49 cremoris: hid2hci_usb_init.patch seems to be the root of that evil. I am not totally sure why OE/Angstrom is even using it so I just comment it out ;-). Feb 19 15:39:41 oh i see Feb 19 15:39:47 ok thanks very much DJWillis Feb 19 15:39:50 I shall do just that Feb 19 15:40:49 It should be fixed up and I know I should do that but dropping the patch did not break anything that I could tell for my needs ;-) Feb 19 15:42:18 ok :) Feb 19 15:44:08 cremoris: out of interest, what platform? Feb 19 15:44:15 ipaq hx4700 Feb 19 15:44:36 hid2hci.o: In function `main': Feb 19 15:44:37 hid2hci.c:(.text+0x8c): undefined reference to `libusb_init' Feb 19 15:44:40 and thats the error Feb 19 15:45:56 That's def. that patch and the fact it seems incomplete under some situations (but builds for others :-o). Feb 19 15:46:43 hmm Feb 19 15:46:53 cremoris: I just # file://hid2hci_usb_init.patch;patch=1 \ in the bluez4 bb and bumped the package revision. Feb 19 15:48:25 cremoris: it is odd, there is something it expects to find but it not marked as a depend (my guess) as it builds fine in one of my OE envs but fails in 2 others. It needs some love from libUSB to link it all up (that is where libusb_init is). Feb 19 15:49:09 - usb_init(); Feb 19 15:49:09 + ret = libusb_init(); Feb 19 15:49:15 yeah Feb 19 15:49:19 thats from the patch Feb 19 15:51:23 cremoris: I can see the reason for the patch and it is safer I guess but I have not seen the problem and the bb already depends on libusb and friends, that is the point I did a 'quick evil hack(tm)' Feb 19 15:51:35 yep :P Feb 19 15:51:50 I've just done your hack, it should compile now.. thanks a lot :) Feb 19 16:04:44 yeah looks like its working fine now :) Feb 19 20:57:57 putukas, I updated to OSK defconfig to build USB and some more modules Feb 19 22:41:59 so if i git pull new recipies it should build a hansome kernel ? :P Feb 19 22:43:00 yeah Feb 19 22:43:14 I didn't bump PR, so do a bitbake -c rebuild linux-omap Feb 19 22:43:36 if ti works and you do not have more requests, I'll bump the PR Feb 19 22:54:53 ok ... i'll be at home tomorrow- then i'll try it :) Feb 19 22:55:40 thanks! Feb 19 22:56:35 thank you :) Feb 19 23:08:05 Crofton can you teach me a bit - i can only build the kernel modules with bitbake kernel ? Feb 19 23:08:36 but is there also some kind of list or something where i can read what i could build with bitbake ? Feb 19 23:09:27 and what are the configurations and targets for various file systems ? Feb 19 23:10:06 and excuse me if those questions are too silly but i'm not that familiar with all the arm and linux stuff... but i'm learning all the time :P Feb 20 02:11:10 are there any new instructions for the installation of e17? the wiki ones seem to be outdated and dont work **** ENDING LOGGING AT Fri Feb 20 02:59:58 2009