**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Thu Mar 01 02:59:59 2012
Mar 01 07:49:00 <snkt> h
Mar 01 08:11:31 <CIA-48> angstrom: 03Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> 07master * r2129eed920 10meta-angstrom/conf/distro/include/angstrom-2010-preferred-versions.inc: 
Mar 01 08:11:31 <CIA-48> angstrom: angstrom-2010-preferred-versions: Delete ANGSTROM_LIBTOOL_VERSION
Mar 01 08:11:31 <CIA-48> angstrom: Its unused
Mar 01 08:11:31 <CIA-48> angstrom: Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
Mar 01 08:11:31 <CIA-48> angstrom: Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net>
Mar 01 09:00:16 <olebrum> Is anyone in here? 
Mar 01 14:21:26 <olebrum> Does anyone know where modules are loaded at startup by systemd? 
Mar 01 14:30:16 <olebrum> Nevermind, it was in /etc/modules-load.d/..
Mar 01 15:20:20 <ENAC_Rob> (tl;dr: apology, wait for the next message for actual question) Hello there, I'm sorry I have to bother people by IRC, but believe me I've searched. neither the site nor the wiki provides exactly what I seek, and it has been two weeks of searching already. So please excuse me if I ask:
Mar 01 15:22:39 <ENAC_Rob> I wish to have the most up-to-date, nearly stable build of angstrom for BeagleBoard with proper support for Rev.C5. Even if I have to build it. Can I have more information ?
Mar 01 15:22:50 <ENAC_Rob>  I tried OE, version is 2010 or earlier (so no C5), and the demo images (with the uboot provided which is too low to see the correct ram amount)
Mar 01 15:23:53 <ENAC_Rob> I gitted OE, the angstrom conf is for 2010, so where you people do get the 2011.11 or higher ones ?
Mar 01 15:24:48 <ENAC_Rob> and narcissus proposes no more than 2011.3
Mar 01 15:32:37 <ENAC_Rob> or is the 2010.x correct and the rest is up to date ?
Mar 01 15:36:49 <olebrum> Hi, what version does /etc/angstrom-version read?
Mar 01 15:39:20 <ENAC_Rob> you mean I should try building with OE and check in the image produced ?
Mar 01 15:40:28 <ENAC_Rob> in the produced image*
Mar 01 15:42:02 <olebrum> I assume you know about angstrom-distribution.org/building-angstrom ? (or similar) 
Mar 01 15:42:08 <ENAC_Rob> yes
Mar 01 15:43:12 <olebrum> What does that build?
Mar 01 15:43:58 <ENAC_Rob> good question, it doesn't say anything, I'll try that to the end
Mar 01 15:44:21 <ENAC_Rob> I'll just let you know what I tried, maybe you'll see what was wrong...
Mar 01 15:45:04 <olebrum> Mine saysAngstrom v2012.02-core (Core edition)
Mar 01 15:45:06 <olebrum> Built from branch: angstrom-staging
Mar 01 15:45:08 <olebrum> Revision: fd393f2ae15983c89e1fda0d632bb20a21e7dcd8
Mar 01 15:45:10 <olebrum> Target system: arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi
Mar 01 15:45:31 <olebrum> Im guessing that is pretty recent. 
Mar 01 15:47:28 <ENAC_Rob> yeah, thanks, so can you tell me if your oebb.sh reads:
Mar 01 15:48:00 <ENAC_Rob> DISTRO="angstrom-2010.x" ?
Mar 01 15:48:17 <ENAC_Rob> (that was what deterred me)
Mar 01 15:50:01 <ENAC_Rob> grep DISTRO= in the script
Mar 01 15:50:26 <olebrum> Yeah,  it does. Now, the version I'm using was not built with "setup-scripts"
Mar 01 15:50:50 <olebrum> Why do you need to build it yourself?
Mar 01 15:51:07 <ENAC_Rob> I've a Rev C5 beagleBoard, and nothing makes it work atm
Mar 01 15:51:23 <ENAC_Rob> well, I, *we*, we are a group of students
Mar 01 15:52:26 <olebrum> I've tried building with setup-scripts and it took some 3-4 hours, but I'm pretty sure the image worked (beaglebone, that is)
Mar 01 15:52:26 <ENAC_Rob> tried the demo images, but the uboot can't load the linux
Mar 01 15:52:43 <ENAC_Rob> yeah, I mean Beagle*Board*
Mar 01 15:53:27 <ENAC_Rob> I plan to use a BeagleBoard rev C5, came out during July of last year because of shortage of a certain C4 part
Mar 01 15:53:58 <ENAC_Rob> Do you mean I should build for a beaglebone machine ?
Mar 01 15:54:35 <olebrum> No, probably not. But does the images you build not work?
Mar 01 15:55:24 <ENAC_Rob> I didn't want to build images that are older than the ones on the demo repo in the first place, so no I didn't build one yet. But if you tell me the distro number has nothing to do I'll try
Mar 01 15:55:55 <ENAC_Rob> the problem actually lies within the uboot with these images though
Mar 01 15:56:25 <olebrum> Where does your boot process stop?
Mar 01 15:57:01 <olebrum> Do you get any boot info at all?
Mar 01 15:57:10 <olebrum> *debug* info?
Mar 01 15:58:51 <ENAC_Rob> see here, that is exactly the same problem we had (bar the version number of uboot) http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.hardware.beagleboard.user/24170
Mar 01 16:00:26 <ENAC_Rob> (and by the way, thanks for your patience up to now)
Mar 01 16:02:40 <ENAC_Rob> but actually you already answered my question, if what's the most up-to-date is the setup script, it should work perfectly
Mar 01 16:03:10 <ENAC_Rob> I just wanted to make sure since the DISTRO var seemed so outdated
Mar 01 16:06:53 <olebrum> Well, Idon't think I made it very clear, but I am actually not using a u-boot made from setup-scripts, I'm using the u-boot.img that came with the board. 
Mar 01 16:07:18 <olebrum> U-Boot 2011.09-00010-g81c8c79 (Feb 13 2012 - 14:48:03)
Mar 01 16:08:35 <ENAC_Rob> you mean, on the nand ?
Mar 01 16:08:54 <olebrum> But the u-boot that came with the board is probably made with the setup scripts. 
Mar 01 16:09:20 <olebrum> Yes, it was preloaded. 
Mar 01 16:09:20 <ENAC_Rob> It is a possibility
Mar 01 16:09:43 <ENAC_Rob> ****, ours wasn't
Mar 01 16:10:58 <ENAC_Rob> and you can't share it easily, I'll come back with the builded image
Mar 01 16:11:04 <ENAC_Rob> tested*
Mar 01 16:11:13 <ENAC_Rob> thank you very much
Mar 01 16:26:03 <ENAC_Rob> is it normal that running the bitbake command produces this line : No config found, please run ./oebb.sh config <machine> first, even though I did do what it says I should do ?
Mar 01 16:39:22 <ENAC_Rob> and now it doesn't anymore
Mar 01 16:39:34 * ENAC_Rob coughs
Mar 01 20:55:26 <CMoH-notebook> hello. is there any replacement for the former unconfigured.sh and setup.sh ?
Mar 01 20:55:39 <CMoH-notebook> i cannot seem to find them on the images built with oe-core
**** ENDING LOGGING AT Fri Mar 02 02:59:58 2012